lacktheknack said:
Getting a diploma that lets me work in any technical field costs $4000 around here. Degrees cost from $6000 to $20000.
Seems worth it to me.
yes in california you can pass high school early (there are ways), take 3 CLEP tests, enroll in University of San Luis Obispo, School of Law, learn stuffs, pay between $0-5000/year, depending on if you are smart and can do favors for teachers, and also, if you do this, later in your life you can take teh california state bar, then you can talk in legalese and nobody except certain ppl will know what you are talking about. Can you guys read this stuff:?
Essay 3 - Evidence:
call 1 - logical relevance, hearsay, present sense impression, state of mind of mechanic(?), expert opinion
call 2 - logical relevance, hearsay, business records, present recollection refreshed, past recollection recorded, learned treatise(yeah right), state of mind of mechanic (?), best evidence, opinion
call 3 - logical relevance, hearsay, effect on listener, state of mind, opinion
call 4 - logical relevance, hearsay, admission (exemption), admission (california?), not a declaration against interest due to availibility, present sense impression(?), state of mind of declarant
call 5 - logical relevance, legal relevance, hearsay, excited utterance (anonymous declarant ok), present sense impression
PT-A
1) did she have access to confidences?
2) presumption she received confidences
3) were the confidences substantially factually similar? would they be of use in the present litigation?
4) her research used by board of trustees in formulating the medical care for indigents policy
5) her research has provided her with knowledge of internal liablity-shielding company policy and may have contributed the board's orchestration of these internal policies
6) must be disqualified
5) presumption that confidences were shared with her firm
5) irrebutable - minority, rebuttable, majority
6) timely and effective?
7) timliness - discuss conflict-checking program, issuance of memorandum
8) effectiveness - discuss 10 person office, 2 attorney project, her supervisory role, the physical proximity of their offices, the judge's belief that she has not disclosed confidences
9) balance - client's interest in choice of representation vs former client's interest in confidentiality, discuss hardships on both sides, contentions regarding availibility of alternate law firms to represent plaintiff, interest the firm has in keeping the case, precautions the firm should have taken (transfer her to other physical location...)
10) conclude that the ethical wall was sufficient given the circumstanes or insufficient under circumstances after all relevant considerations and tell the judge it is within his discretion to decide either way, since the Model Rules of professional conduct are silent