That's pretty much what everyone has said. So unless you think racial preference is uniquely malleable, I don't see what your point is.Flowen said:No, it's really not. Sexual attraction isn't something that can be easily changed, and the sex you're attracted to is pretty much set from day 1. Now, I know where a lot of you are coming from, but you're phrasing things incorrectly and making yourselves racist by association.
No, it's a general statement. Or rather, instead of assuming people are being definitively racist, I'm assuming they're using a general statement as people tend to do when discussing preferences. I find it especially difficult to believe those people couldn't make any exceptions based on such little given information and do not find it reasonable to interpret it that way."I'm not attracted to black people." That's a racist statement. "black people" encompasses such a huge variety of people that it's not really safe to make such a broad statement without there being some kind of racist undertone.
So then why are you doing it? Or will you explain how racial preference is special from all the other preferences? Edit: Or perhaps you're not, but then this doesn't seem relevant to your previous point about people misphrasing what they're saying."I'm not attracted to people with curly hair." That is not a racist statement. Not being attracted to certain features is a perfectly valid opinion to have, and you shouldn't be judged harshly for it. You're also not painting with nearly as broad of a brush as you are when using race as your defining feature.
Editted to be less adversarial.