You know, you should do a break down of every thread a few pages in. It would probably save people a lot of time.LetalisK said:Jesus
If anyone else responds I'm just going to point to this post and the last paragraph.
You know, you should do a break down of every thread a few pages in. It would probably save people a lot of time.LetalisK said:Jesus
I'm using the word "repugnant" in the sense that it is the opposite of attraction. You're either attracted to something, feel nothing for something, or repelled by it. Any further coloration of the word is irrelevant. I'm not attacking anyone.runic knight said:I don't feel attracted to men, that does not mean I find them repugnant. I do not feel attraction to largely over or underweight women, that does not mean I find them repugnant. Attraction does have a very inherent nature to it (hell, that old adage "you can't help who you love" sort of is based in the idea). At a base level, if attributes of a person are something that have no attraction to, then that is not racism.
What you try to claim here seems to be presuming the motive of the person simply because it is easier to attack that way.
I'm not saying that, most races have minor physical differences that don't usually appear in other races. That in itself doesn't make them unattractive but some people will find those features don't match up to what they find attractive.rhodo said:dementis said:I just don't find the features of certain races attractive. I don't think finding certain features attractive makes you racist, hating someone for the features does.
Because all asians have small eyes and big teeth, all black men have huge lips and afros, amIrite?
Gosh, this thread is scary. Scary.
Its shallow to discriminate sexual partners by features which you find sexually appealing/unappealing?Vizanto said:If it's purely looks than maybe, MAYBE, it's not racist. Though it still makes a person genuinely shallow as hell. So there's really no positive outlook on this. You're either racist or shallow, pick which one is less worse I guess.
That's not choice then.CriticKitten said:Yes, I'm saying that a person's choice in both gender and physical attributes is something engrained into them from birth.
He is right, though, even you admitted it. Science pretty much acknowledges that "nature vs nurture" is a false argument and that it's "nature and nurture". I think that's what he meant.CriticKitten said:And saying "nature vs nurture is bullshit" suggests to me that you never took psychology in school. It's the fundamental basis for the entire science of psychology and the human mind, it's not "bullshit". >_>
So, I'm going to go with "yeah". I mean, it's essentially saying that if someone met every one of a thousand different qualifiers they were looking for, but the race did not match, they weren't interested. Kind of by definition that's racism. "When I discriminate by race, am I being racist?" seems to be the OP question. So, yeah, certainly.: the belief that some races of people are better than others
ok I guess, that does seem more reasonable then. Still, even as you say here, it could just be the "feel nothing" option.Soundwave said:I'm using the word "repugnant" in the sense that it is the opposite of attraction. You're either attracted to something, feel nothing for something, or repelled by it. Any further coloration of the word is irrelevant. I'm not attacking anyone.runic knight said:I don't feel attracted to men, that does not mean I find them repugnant. I do not feel attraction to largely over or underweight women, that does not mean I find them repugnant. Attraction does have a very inherent nature to it (hell, that old adage "you can't help who you love" sort of is based in the idea). At a base level, if attributes of a person are something that have no attraction to, then that is not racism.
What you try to claim here seems to be presuming the motive of the person simply because it is easier to attack that way.
Possibly because of the instant stigma such a preference would probably get for being mentioned out loud. Myself though, I an not attracted to the orange color spray tans at all. Just looks so off to me. But I suppose it is because of that I can sort of see how the logic could apply. Maybe some people see black skin in the same way? Though yes, it is probably much more likely racist related when people say that sort of thing, so this point is more on an intellectual level as a possibility then a real defense of the guy in the OP.Kaulen Fuhs said:Yeah, not much you can do about it at that point, I suppose. Even saying "I only date people with white/pale skin" can come across the wrong way. Though I've never met someone who had a skin color preference who wasn't... morally questionable. Not saying it can't happen, just that it's kind of a rare thing to quibble over.runic knight said:Oh I do agree there, don't get me wrong, I merely disliked the idea that he presented that people saying they weren't attracted to a race instantly was a replacement for something far more sinister or egotistical.Kaulen Fuhs said:Of course, they would then have to say that they are not attracted to Asians, or Native Americans. It's so difficult to assign specific traits uniformly to an entire race, then turn around and say, "Therefore, I dislike (aesthetically) this race", that doing so will give the appearance of racism, intended or not. Easier to simply say "I dislike these traits" and leave it at that.runic knight said:Someone brought up the point that African-Americans have almost uniformly black hair. It is a trait of their race. If someone does not feel attraction to that trait, and if that trait is important enough to affect attraction over all, one could say that they are not attracted to black people in a way that is not racist (as it is not because of their race, rather, because of a trait their race just happens to have predominantly).
You are right though, would save a lot of hassle to just say "I don't feel attracted to this trait" then anything else.
Though, what if said trait is skin color? Obviously with the visual nature we use to mark races in the first place, that would be a bit of a hard way to present it as it is. At that point, saying "I don't feel attracted to this race" would probably have the same reaction from people as "I don't feel attracted to this skin color."
Wouldn't it also make anyone who isn't dating someone of the same gender a homophobe as well?Headbiter said:Nope, it's not. Sorry to all those political correct people out there, but this is just another case of "let's use words we don't really understand".
Racism describes a philosophy (and I guess here's where the first among you frown), after which a certain race is superior (or inferior, depending on your perspective) based on the fact they belong to that race.
That's it. If you say "all black people are thieves" then that's racist, since you imply a direct connection between being a criminal (a term usually connected with negative attributes) and their race. Same for the other side of the spectrum by saying "Only white men are fit to lead a company." (here you declare a set of positive attribute exclusively to white men, therefore denying those qualities to all other ethnicities and gender...s).
"I find all black people unattractive" however is - in and of itself- not racist. It's a preference of yours, a matter of taste. It might OFFEND people, sure. It's uncomfortable to hear someone say that you could never be attractive to him/her, no matter how hard you try. But unless you go on proclaiming that race's general inferiority, ineptitude or claiming that i.e. "one simply cannot be attracted to these people" you're not in the dreaded "racist"-territory.
Won't stop people from calling you that though.
Funny little detail at the end: If you'd consider the refusal to date a certain ethnicity (based on your personal taste) as racist, then following this logic, that would pretty much make every human who's NOT bisexual sexist.
So yeah, guess the message of the day is "Know your buzzwords."
If you don't want to date them because of their race, then yes. That's the very definition of racism.lacktheknack said:So my question is: Does not wanting to date people from a certain race or races make you racist?
You answered your own question. A general statement does not require omniscience on the subject and implies the possible existence of exceptions.Andothul said:Yes and no. Attraction in humans is tricky thing and influenced by immeasurable factors.
I think the thing people get upset at when people say for example : "I don't find Black girls attractive." is that by saying that you generalize all black girls as unattractive to you even though you have not met or gotten to know every single black girl. How do you know there wont be one down the road that you are attracted to?