BeanDelphiki said:
Mad Scientist said:
There hasn't even been any work done (to my knowledge) to check whether the male and female methods even measure the same thing -- they just assume that blood flow is an identical signifier for both groups.
Actually, recent research has suggested that it
doesn't measure the same thing in men and women - women's self-reported arousal patterns don't
remotely match blood flood measurements.
Interesting. I've been wondering about that ever since that "all women are pansexual" thing came out and people started throwing it around everywhere as evidence that women's sexuality must be more fluid than men's. (They found that their blood flow measurements responded to women viewing sexual activity of any kind, including nonhuman activity, and went "hey, women are aroused by EVERYTHING!" Or maybe you're measuring an unrelated physiological response to sexual activity in genreal, morons?)
Do you have a link to the recent study, or know where I might find it?