Lexodus said:
Really? I find it's the other way around. I've had a lot of hassle in the past for using a Mac (until, of course, the day when those people come to my house and see how great my computer is), and I have to fight to make myself heard over the screaming Microsofters.
ANYWAY!
[1]I like Macs-
[2]They don't get viruses
[3]They can do everything a Windows does (boot camp & Intel engines come as standard)
[4](Vista. I don't need to say any more.)
[5]They are easy to use and more user-friendly
[6]THEY DON'T CRASH EVERY FIVE-TO-TEN SECONDS.
While it doesn't have an intel engine, because it is over six years old, I am still very happy with my old G4. It does everything I want, including WoW.
First: Macs are PC's. Plain and simple they are all computers, and now that Apple is using Intel processors and all the hardware that goes along with the only real difference is the operating system.
Why I quoted the above? Well I wanted to give a few answers to his blind devotion:
[1]I do not prefer mac's, will get to the reasons why shortly.
[2]Do you realize who wrong this statement is? There are many viruses floating around, and as the computers rise above the 10% market share they have they will see more and more exploits. There is nothing special about Mac OS that prevents people from finding an exploit, they just have to wonder why they want to take their time finding a mac exploit when they could realistically expect to only infect a few hundred computers. Where if they geared it towards a Windows OS they could easily infect thousands to hundreds of thousands.
[3] Yeah because they are all PC's; Windows, Linux, Mac are all just software running on hardware that is pretty much identical. The reason your older Mac does not run Windows is because they intentionally built the hardware out as incompatible. Since they had a lower market share you had to buy your parts from Apple, and all service work had to be done by Apple. They wanted to make money off you from cradle to grave. At some point (probably as their share of market started to head south faster then a freight train full of Confederates after the civil war) they realized they needed to start doing something different. This started the Mac culture campaign and eventually lead to working with Intel.
[4] Yes you do need to say more... I run a machine with Vista Ultimate 64 bit version. It has run flawlessly. Of course I did not install immediately and do from time to time have issues with a program that was made to run on XP, but this is to be expected. Also while those programs crash, the system does not. Not all programs conform to the developers guidelines Microsoft has and uses to try and ensure backwards compatibility. Many take shortcuts or use shoddy programing, leading to issues down the road and with updates not only from Microsoft but sometimes from other companies updating their software on your computer.
[5] This one is the reason I do not prefer macs, the other responses just put it on equal footing with all the other OS out there. They are not "user friendly," they are intuitive owing to a similarity of interface among programs. Basically once you learn how to operate one program everything will seem strangely familiar. Like learning to fly a small aircraft and then sitting in the cockpit of a 737, you might not be able to fly it well but everything will be familiar, and easier to learn. Apple has a much stricter developer program. Rather then just making information available (it is now, was not always the case) They restricted access to it, and would deny you access if they where working on an in house program similar to yours. Something they still practice with the iPhone. This is why all mac software is overpriced. Now allowing more access to developers has started to place it in more equal footing with other OS's, which brings me to the next point.
[6]THEY DON'T CRASH EVERY FIVE-TO-TEN SECONDS. They may not, but it would take an especially inept person, or damaged hardware to make that happen on any type of system. My computer never crashes, occasionally a program will, but this is a big difference from the system failing. Should the statement "They just work" be correct then there would be no help desk forum plagued with white-screen-of-death questions, no boot camp experiences that resulted in dead computers sent to the Apple repair center, hell there would be no Apple repair center. They have the same problems as any OS, from time to time Apple developed products will fail on you running on the OS they where designed for. Seems like a cruel joke when itunes causes a WSOD when you try to play that latest DRMed track you might not have gotten from iTunes but they swore would work with it.
It is a PC and the only positives you have that make your OS stand out from the pack is that not enough people use it for anyone to give it the attention Microsoft gets.
Oh and they are pretty. Look at the colors.... ohhh. Rainbow.
This post was brought to you by the Get Over Yourself Group, buying a product does not introduce you into a some elite culture. Linux does not make you "L337 UB3R |-|4><0R," Microsoft is not only good for games, and is the mainstay of offices around the world, which if it was as unstable and vulnerable to attack as you say, it would not be. They all have their strengths and their weaknesses, you just need to pick one based on personal preference, there are programs to do whatever you want with it on any OS.