I asked you because laughing at someone like that is both maliciously disrespectful & deliberately insulting. I was curious why you'd exhibit such ill-mannered behaviour in what seems a celebration of a bigoted double standard. Now I'm curious why you'd laugh at a man riding a bicycle, do you consider those effeminate too?rutger5000 said:Tollerance is different from accepting, and accepting is different from respecting.catalyst8 said:I'm curious about whether you laugh at women in make-up, as well as why you'd laugh at either & why you think men wearing make-up is foolish. Can you explain please?rutger5000 said:Perfectly okay if your in a metal band, otherwise you're just making a fool of yourself. But if you want I won't stop you, maybe laugh at you, but that's all.
I ussually snicker when I notice it, but that's besides the point. I wouldn't laugh out loud at a woman wearing make up for the same reason I wouldn't laugh at a toddler riding a bicycle, but would laugh at a grown man doing to same. Society has formed certain roles and customs for us the play, which roles and customs are appropriate for us depends on our age, gender, physical (dis)abilities, intelligence, weight, etc, etc.
When one chooses to disobey those roles / customs without doing harm to oneself or other, then I wouldn't stop that person. But it's wrong to automatically demand understanding and respect for doing so.
I find make - up effeminante, and don't understand most effeminante things. I've learned to accept it when woman are effeminante, but it boggles my mind when a man would choice to do so (except when said man is mentally a woman). As a reaction of my lack of understanding I'd laugh. Granted that might not be the kindest thing in the world to do, but I find it natrual.
I hope this satisfies your curiosity.
In return I'd like you to satisfy my curiosity: "Why did you ask me this question?" My statement isn't odd, neither is my defence of it. Most people would agree with me, so what about my statement made you so curious? Or where you just trying to ridiculise my point of view?
p.s. With that last remark I didn't try to ridiculise your question. I tried to ridiculise your attempt to ridiculise my point of view, if that attempt existed
All prehistoric archaeological evidence suggests that men wore cosmetics long before women. The first historically documented cases show that men wore cosmetics before women in Menes Dynasty Egypt, & have continued to do so today in many cultures on many continents like Aboriginal Australians, Erbores in Ethiopia, American Indians like the Apache, numerous Europeans & North Americans who wear brightly coloured cosmetics to various sporting events, etc. During the 18th & 19th century it was considered fashionable & proper for both men & women to wear cosmetics in many of what are now considered to be 'Western' countries e.g. France & Regency England. It was only at the close of that century that the fashion fell out of favour.
It's important to draw distinctions between rules, roles, customs, & fashion. When you say 'disobey those roles / customs' you're demonstrating a misconception of the terms. Certainly a role is not a rule to be obeyed or disobeyed, & a custom is generally a matter of tradition & form which can be observed or disregarded in the same way that laughing at people is considered to be disregarding the custom of basic manners. In this particular aesthetic context 'fashion' denotes popularity of styles of appearance (literal definition 'a popular or the latest style of clothing, hair, or decoration' OED 2012), & that seems to be what you're mocking - something unfashionable.
If you genuinely find effeminate practices risible then presumably you laugh at clean-shaven men for exactly the same reason, because by your reasoning a beardless man is most certainly more effeminate than one wearing cosmetics. To my mind the ridicule is as bizarre as the Romans mocking Celts for wearing trousers because they considered covering the legs an effeminate practice. If one is to abide by the same reasoning then any male who makes a conscious choice about their appearance is effeminate, regardless of whether they wear a particular garment, have a particular haircut or even have their hair barbered at all.
EDIT: For Menes Dynasty please read Narmer Dynasty; while archaeologically they're considered synonymous the former might be considered an obscure term for the latter.