That has to do with addiction because, in my opinion, when something has such a high priority on your list of things to do that things that are really important fall to the wayside, that is an addiction. Let's say it does have everything to do with their personality, show me one non-anecdotal piece of evidence that suggests that the science is on your side for that one. Link to a respectable source or something. Plus, even if it does have to do with their personality, aren't they still addicted? Chemical addictions and physical addictions are not the only kind.runtheplacered said:Your asking me why I'd rather blame the personality of said human being rather then pot for their behavior? I'm not even sure that deserves an answer. It sounds like a smartass comment to me.a7r0p05 said:How would it be more reasonable to blame personalities? And yes, I am blaming pot.runtheplacered said:Even if that's true, which I'd love to hear the tale of how that could have happened (I have a feeling we're blaming pot, when maybe we should be blaming personalities) how is that evidence of addiction?a7r0p05 said:Yes.
I have seen multiple people that I was very close friends with have their lives completely go to the shithouse soon after they started to smoke it.
EDIT - Alright, I felt bad and have to say more. Maybe you really aren't putting things together and really are that naive.
We've already discussed how marijuana is not addictive. So, if your friends lives were really in the "shithouse" from it, they could have easily stopped at any point in time, if they had the "personality" to look at themselves and notice their situation. But, apparently they didn't.
Now, there's no chance marijuana ruined their lives. Or anyone elses. I'm sorry, but the drug just doesn't work that way. It doesn't make you beat your wife. It doesn't make you sell your appliances for "just another couple tokes". It doesn't even make you drive into telephone polls or miss work from a hangover.
You can go ahead and blame pot if you want to. But that doesn't automatically make it reality just because you believe something. In fact, you sound a whole lot like the 1936 movie Reefer Madness. Personally, I could care less about your anecdotal evidence. I have science on my side. You have some random story that you have yet to actually explain.
Now with all of that said, why did you ignore my question about what your claim has to do with addiction? I was counting on you to answer that question.
P.S.- Wikipedia doesn't count.