Poll: Most Disappointing Game of 2011?

Recommended Videos

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
Daget Sparrow said:
Brink. THAT was a colossal failure on my part. $90 down the drain...
You and me both. Also, Dragon Age 2 was a pretty dismal experience for me.

Mausthemighty said:
Dragon Age 2. I loved the first one, but the second one felt really rushed to me. The blatant re-use of the same dungeon map, the unrealisitic spawning of entire groups of enemies, the short story and limited exploration made this game a huge disappointment for me. I also hated what they did to Anders's character. I loved him in Awakenings (a wizard-version of Alistair), but in this one he was a very annoying character. I felt no remorse when I plunged a dagger in him.
I agree. I mean, I wasn't too keen on DA:Awakening, but I must admit I really loved Anders in it, especially with his remarks about Ser Pounce-a-lot. What in the hell did they do to him? :/
 

viking97

New member
Jan 23, 2010
858
0
0
portal 2 for me, just being above average is a lot lower then "It will descend from the skies and lead us to the promised land, then give us some cake". perhaps those may have been unreasonable standards, but valve might as well have not made a portal sequel if they weren't going to meet them. it's not like portal NEEDED a sequel at all.
 

Pandabearparade

New member
Mar 23, 2011
962
0
0
Throwing out another Dragon Age 2 vote.

A near death-blow to a great franchise. If Dragon Age 3 is this bad, kiss it goodbye.
 

80Maxwell08

New member
Jul 14, 2010
1,102
0
0
Major_Tom said:
Witcher II. I was expecting so much from that game, but it failed miserably. How can you make a PC exclusive that plays like a console port?
This one confused the heck out of me when I finally played it. It requires an extremely high end PC to max it out so only the most hardcore PC gamers would have an interest in it and it had so many awful UI decisions that reeked of console port. I know they were talking about releasing it on consoles later but that was easily an "if we can" comment I didn't think they would make it for consoles and use really high end graphics tech.
 
Dec 21, 2011
105
0
0
Karutomaru said:
It's not like there was anything to look forward to in 2011. It's been a pathetic year overall.
Seriously? Nothing to look forward to? Not even one game that got your hopes up? Or one that was at least "pretty good"? What did you play!?!
 

Ziame

New member
Mar 29, 2011
249
0
0
BF3 because without the addon, the destruction is minuscule. Can't destroy wagons in metro, can't destroy walls on grand bazaar... i didn't buy CoD, DICE, why you gave me CoD then?
 

Idlemessiah

Zombie Steve Irwin
Feb 22, 2009
1,050
0
0
I bought and never played DA2 cause my friend borrowed it while I was playing DA1. As soon as he gave it back I traded it in. That was the only real negative this year imo.

I can't really form an opinion on best games though cause I've spent all year playing Minecraft...
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
oh yay..one of thease[/I] threads


viking97 said:
portal 2 for me, just being above average is a lot lower then "It will descend from the skies and lead us to the promised land, then give us some cake". perhaps those may have been unreasonable standards, but valve might as well have not made a portal sequel if they weren't going to meet them. it's not like portal NEEDED a sequel at all.
well thankfully for me portal 2 took my expectations and blew them into space (hehe)

1. I was worried that it would be too short, it didnt feel too short at all and they really "upped" the anti, it felt suitibly epic

2. I was worried it would dick around with the ending...but no, an excellent balance of ambiguity and conclusion...satisfying, yet somthing left to the imagination

I would be happy if they didnt do a seaquel...

anyway I do find it funny that (when talking about hype) people blame others[/I] for their expectations
 

Dandark

New member
Sep 2, 2011
1,703
0
0
*Edit* Changed since I learnt to play it.

I'd say that the most dissapointing was Skyrim *Raises flame shield*.

It wasn't bad but despite my best efforts I got caught up in all the hype and expected a lot from it.
Sure I enjoyed playing the main questline once but then I got completely bored. I haven't really been able to force myself to play it now since it's a nice big open world that tries to pretend it's alive when it's actully dead.

I could of enjoyed it mpre but sadly I had my expectations raised too high thanks to games like STALKER and Mount and Blade.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,087
0
0
Bear in mind that I didn't have time to play all of the big titles and those I've played are the ones I've really been looking forwards to.
My biggest disappointment is Saints Row The Third. It's not a bad game. It's actually quite good, but it's a game that I expected too much from. My hopes were loaded and expecting an improved Saints Row 2. I expected solid gold laced with tiny emeralds and diamonds when all I got was silver. Good game, but my biggest disappointment of 2011. As for the question in the poll, this has been a great year for gaming. Batman Arkham City is just totally awesome and I can't get enough of it. I had some expectations for it since I wasn't a very big fan of Asylum since I didn't complete it until October this year (I waited until I had a decent computer before playing it then forgot it until then), but it rolled over all my expectations and crushed them with its awesomeness.
 

Rariow

New member
Nov 1, 2011
342
0
0
A bunch of REALLY good games came out this year: Skyrim, Human Revolution, Portal 2, Skyward Sword (As far as I've heard. I don't have a Wii) and so on. There were some dissapointments such as TOR or Dragon Age 2, but I think it was quite a good one. When this topic came up last year (I didn't know about the Escapist, but a bunch of other gaming forums I was at were discusing this), I said that 2010 was an OK year with some good releases, but the really good games seemed to be looming on the horizon of 2011. To be honest, I don't think 2011 was as good as I thought it would be (At least videogame release related), but I'd still call it above average.

Oh, yeah, also still no sign at all of HL2 Episode 3. That's a huge dissapointment. At this rate, it'll take the place that Duke Nukem Forever had as "The game that will never be made".
 

RuralGamer

New member
Jan 1, 2011
953
0
0
Funnily enough, no game has disappointed me so far this year.

Admittedly I've not bought much;
Total War: Shogun 2 (meh; not bad, but the series has been more fun in the past; best campaign map and naval battles so far)
Dawn of War 2: Retribution (its not the best campaign in the series, but its fun nevertheless)
Men of War: Assault Squad (best strategy I've played in a while)
Skyrim (still not made up my mind, but so far, there's little I can criticise besides a few rather poor design choices; I'm definitely enjoying it though)
 

DarkTenka

New member
Apr 7, 2010
95
0
0
How is every post in this thread NOT Duke Nukem Forever?! .. is it just automatically exempt for being "most obvious choice" ?
 

Joccaren

Elite Member
Mar 29, 2011
2,597
3
43
Duke Nukem
DA2
Mass Effect 3 (Because it got delayed for some kinect crap. I can see where they were going, but Shepard doesn't even say what you select, so it would be you saying something, then Shepard saying something completely different. Or it would ignore what Shepard would say and have the NPC give a response that would be more suited towards what Shepard had said. I can't see it being anything but underwhelming. However, that Skyrim voice command thing I have on my PC is epic for shouts. FUS RO DAH!)
Skyrim.

Duke Nukem is self explanatory how crap that game ended up being. At the start, I was like 'Yeah, there is a bit wrong with it [Two weapon limit, regenerating health], but its still fun, and its got puzzles. Finally, a game with puzzles to solve rather than just move and shoot. After the first 2 levels, it just got really, really crap.

DA2 was a disappointment partially as a game itself, and partially as a sequel.
The game was more rushed than KotOR2 and recycled all of its environments at least twice, whilst sticking you in the same city for the whole damn game. The story, whilst a little original, was bad. A hero rises to power is your average story for a RPG, and could be used in comedy RPGs to parody the whole levelling thing. Bioware goes on and puts it as you rise to be the most powerful figure in X city, a lesser version of just being the most powerful guy, then has you become powerful by basically tomb raiding, and apparently all that gives power is money (What much of the story revolves around). The sub-plots are more interesting than the main story, but most go nowhere, and only appear for one act. The ending was just crap, and your clichéd cliff hanger.
The game was a bad sequel as, whilst it is important to change things up in a sequel to make it worthy of actually being a sequel not an expansion, everything was changed, and sometimes not in a good way. Art design and graphics have improved, but have drastically altered the appearances of some of the characters and creatures we became familiar with in Origins. Several decisions from Origins were retconned, such as Leliana's death. The series went from being RPG to Action Adventure game with RPG elements (And really, what games these days don't have some RPG element or other? [Yes, there are some, but a great deal have at least on RPG element. BF3, for example, has the rank (Or level) up system]). Combat went from being interactive movie style to button mash style. Whilst the first's was boring to some, the seconds was annoying and stupid in many ways. I.E: Spawning enemies. The biggest sign of lazy design when Origins had at least 90% of its enemies pre-placed for you to stumble across. Instead of a large open world to explore, like in Origins, you are stuck not in a 'hold' (to use the Skyrim term for it) instead of a country, but in a single city, with small bits and pieces done in copy/pasted dungeons outside. But, enough on DA2...

Skyrim. Many reasons for this. 1. Too short quest lines, and too many radial quests instead. Would have been far better to have longer quest lines, and less radial quests than this way round.
The civil war is utter bullcrap. Nothing actually happens at all, except for a couple of Stormcloak arrests. I have not once come across a Stormcloak attack on a town or fort, nor random skirimishes in the wild. And before someone pipes up and says 'Do the civil war quest line' I SHOULD NOT HAVE TO. It is a civil war, not a civil 'lets wait for the PC to choose a side then attack a few places for us to win the war'. There is nothing to denote a civil war going on, despite it being talked about constantly by NPCs. Yes, the decision is quite grey, and that is nice, but IMO there is no civil war, merely a coup started by myself to put my selected leader in charge of both halves of Skyrim.
Graphics. I was lead to believe they were awesome and amazing. Nope. The scale is, but that was to be expected. The actual graphics themselves are meh. Textures are utter crap, shadows are horrible, and many, many models have little detail to them. Lighting is meh, not good not bad, and I have to wonder whether I missed a 'compared to Oblivion' at the end.
When people are talking, they have nothing to indicate it other than a moving mouth. If they're having a great argument with someone, they'll just be walking around casually, or staring at each other in a casual pose. It just looks stupid.
Dragons sounded like an epic and awesome fight. They ended up as 'Wait for Dragon to land, attack 3 times, dead dragon' and happen far too often, and I only run into them every hour or so ATM. It also doesn't help that some Dragons are pants on head retarded, and will just fly around in the air for literally half an hour, then either fly off or land in front of me. It will do nothing but fly in that half hour. No matter if it gets attacked or not, it will just fly. Really pisses me off.
The game is so broken in some places its not funny. I can now never become Thane of Riften for one reason, just one. Want to know what it is? After buying my house I decided to have a look inside. To become Thane, I should have spoken to the Jarl. Now, there is no conversation option to become Thane simply because I walked into my house. It is a well known problem online, and there is no fix. I have my inventory full of quest items I can't get rid off simply because I acquired them before the quest. Books that I found, then was sent on a quest to get mostly. I can not hand them in as the quest has not progressed to that level yet, and keeps pointing me to collect it from chest X in location Y, whilst chest X is empty, and I have the book in my inventory. On the PC version, Esbern's dialogue one specific place plays through instantly and he does not follow the actions he should afterwords. It is a known problem, and has a fix online, but literally breaks the main quest chain. I expected bugs, but I had hoped Bethesda wouldn't have stuff like this. Flying horses, I can handle, Dragons being annoying, I can understand. Bugs that break quests, including the main one, I hate.
 

RastaBadger

New member
Jun 5, 2010
317
0
0
Most disappointing was Duke Nukem Forever. It could have been something to bring us back to the days of shooters when they were about fast paced wizz bang shooty fun but instead it just sucked.
 

Mr. Self Destruct

New member
Feb 26, 2009
228
0
0
My most dissapointing game is going to have to be Dark Souls, I started loosing interest but kept playing, then I got to Seath and just thought 'I am done with this game'. I didn't find it overly challenging, some of the bosses were awesome (here's looking at you big ass wolf) but overall, a big ol' merr. It's a shame because Demon's Souls was the reason I bought a ps3 and that was worth it and the some.
 

lostlevel

Senior Member
Nov 6, 2008
163
0
21
It turns out I didn't buy any games this year, There were not many games that enthused me enough to buy them. I bought add-ons or played ones I already owned as I felt for the sake of my degree I didn't have time to commit to the sprawling time sponge games. It's a shame, I did however play some of the new releases I wouldn't say any disappointed me massively but the FPS games all seemed the same this year. I was going to go with BF3 but the origin code nonsense put me off and the fact it's trying to be like COD.
 

Ryank1908

New member
Oct 18, 2009
266
0
0
Amazing year. Bear with me.

Deus Ex, LA Noire, SW:TOR, Space Marine, Arkham City, Skyrim, Battlefield 3, Shogun 2 (No ones mentioned that yet?)Dead Island, Dead Rising: OTR, DoW 2: Retribution, Portal 2, Minecraft..

There were big disappointments too, sure. There always are - such is the nature of this industry. But when reflecting on a year in gaming I prefer to look at how good the good was, instead of how many games fucked up.

This year, the good was very, very good.