TheSanityAssassin said:
BonsaiK said:
TheSanityAssassin said:
BonsaiK said:
TheSanityAssassin said:
how about 'autotuned monstrosity'
Think twice before you wish someone wasn't Auto-tuned...
not really the point, if they can't sing they should not be in the studio trying to be 'famous singers'.
Meh. Sid Vicious was a famous bass player and he couldn't play a note. I think anyone should have a crack at it if they want to, why the hell not. If people don't like it, they won't buy it.
yeah but then he's not really playing is he?
so actually the editer/producer is more of a famous bass player.
it's like trying to be a famous painter but you can't paint so you take a picture of your painting and give it to someone so he can fotoshop it for you.
i especially hate the kind of autotune somebody posted earlier, because that's just really annoying.
look i've worked in a studio and seen all this autotune nonsense in action.
I work in a studio too and we use Auto-tune all the time. Believe it or not, we've never used it once to hide a bum note - because every time you use Auto-tune people
immediately suspect bum notes. We got Auto-tune in our studio because clients kept requesting it, because they
like that sound. Auto-tune these days is generally used as a sonic effect, not a note-fixer. It's a popular sound right now, simple as that, just like gated drums in the 1980s and echoey vocals in the 1950s. There are far more subtle, far more effective ways to fix bum notes, that aren't as audible in the final product. If I wanted to fix a bad singer's pitching, the
last thing I would use is Autotune.