MammothBlade said:Can you be a nazi in the absence of nazism? I think the answer to that is yes.
Unfortunately "communist" states are almost universally totalitarian dictatorships. Stalinist and Maoist states place power in the hands of a small group of individuals. They have used parts of communist political ideology and "collective" interest to justify terrible atrocities and deprivations of liberty. And the Western Far-Left all too often dismissed and denied such actions during the cold war, sympathising with the USSR and PRC. Could communist states have turned out differently? Possibly. There were no provisions for preserving liberty and justice - old guard, intellectuals, dissidents, and many more were mercilessly crushed by both the Soviet and Maoist governments, as they believed only in absolute domination according to their political lines. This might be because communist ideology itself tends towards authoritarian groupthink, which gives leaders a justification to eliminate potentially anyone as an enemy of the revolution. Perhaps the whole communism experiment would have turned out differently if the Bolsheviks had established a democratic constitutional framework preventing any one person or group from having too much power.Tony said:Communism isn't that bad. West Europe and America just make Communism sound like the political party of Satan.
This.
And I in general support Communism as a theory, I just don't think it is plausible yet due to human nature and technology (I mean, c'mon, if we get Star Trek replicators and transporters, it might actually work out). I do however find Socialist Capitalism (high taxes, state-owned companies and certain state-owned production, etc) very viable (you know, because it has worked) and I fully support it.