Oh god I totaly forgot about PETA.Worgen said:partly but it seems like one extreme is peta (which is stupid) and the other one is the kkk (which is stupid and dangerous)
*I try not to think about the KKK and neo-nazis so thanks for that*
Oh god I totaly forgot about PETA.Worgen said:partly but it seems like one extreme is peta (which is stupid) and the other one is the kkk (which is stupid and dangerous)
It's patently absurd to alter one's language to this extent. I really can't say that there's anything I'd find offensive. I don't see why anyone cares. As long as they aren't going out of their way to be offensive then fine. If they are then the "offended party" needs to toughen up a bit. Unless it's a threat but that's a different story altogether.harv3034 said:First, the context.
I am in the middle of writing a Persuasive essay on Freedom of Speech on College Campuses (worst topic ever by the way). As part of this assignment, I have to read various articles on the topic for homework so I can use some of them for source material and/or supporing/counterarguments.
Tonight's reading is called "Bias-Free Language: Some Guidelines" written by Rosalie Maggio. In this essay, Maggio says that political correctness is very important and that we need to activly work to instatute it into everyday language. At it's core this is a good thing, but the way she wants us to go about it sucks away all the credibility of the argument and throws the article into "parady mode."
Maggio says that when refering to a group of mixed gener or a person of unknown gender, we must not use words and phrases that imply masculinity (he, sir, waiter, ect...). Again, hard to dispute, but later she goes to suggest the general removal of the letter combinations m-a-n and m-e-n from many everyday words.
Under this policy, we would also have to change a great many other words on the grounds that they might offend 1 person out of 10,000. Fat would become "big-boned" or "differently sized", Stupid becomes "exceptional", and Stoned would be re-branded as "chemically inconvenienced".To prevent the chance of seeming racist, we would need to change "black eye" to "mouse", "black mail" to "payola", and "black sheep" to "outcast".
And these changes would need to be implemented, not just in writing, but in verbal communication as well.
To me, this is utterly rediculous. But I want your opinions as well.
So, what do you think?
I had an American call me out on saying 'black guy' once and telling me off telling me I should be saying 'African American', I called him stupid (Exceptional!) and told him the guy I was referring to was another English guy like me so he can hardly be American.ElTigreSantiago said:Rediculous indeed.
I have found that using politicly correct terms makes things a lot more awkward than simply saying "black", for example. It throws it out there that you don't want to offend them and that you think you will offend them, it's just awkward for everybody.
And FYI, not every black person is an "African American". Like, what do we call black people living in England? African English? I know people that would call them African Americans simply so they don't call them black, even though they aren't American.
Ickorus said:I had an American call me out on saying 'black guy' once and telling me off telling me I should be saying 'African American', I called him stupid (Exceptional!) and told him the guy I was referring to was another English guy like me so he can hardly be American.ElTigreSantiago said:Rediculous indeed.
I have found that using politicly correct terms makes things a lot more awkward than simply saying "black", for example. It throws it out there that you don't want to offend them and that you think you will offend them, it's just awkward for everybody.
And FYI, not every black person is an "African American". Like, what do we call black people living in England? African English? I know people that would call them African Americans simply so they don't call them black, even though they aren't American.
By that womans logic we'll have to call black heads coloured heads because black heads obviously paint black people in a negative light.
Seriously, people that are politically correct and make sure that everything they say is PC are the most racist of us all.
Ahlycks said:also, for lulz, look up facepalm on google images with safe search off.
It was this. If it doesn't work this time, I give up. It's an akbar pic.Father Time said:So I'm guessing the pic was removed but what was it?Naheal said:Ahlycks said:also, for lulz, look up facepalm on google images with safe search off.![]()
Never take safe search off!
I know. I was reading a post on a website about a guy's conversation with an old man in a diner, who started telling him that his son was out in Africa as a missionary, and showed him a picture of 'nineteen african-americans and one caucasian'. African-American? Bullshit, they were just fucking *african*. Besides, what if you're neither african nor american? I'm not offended when somebody says I'm white, and I don't know anybody offended by the term 'black', as long as it's not a slur against them. Just keep it simple, ya morons -.-ElTigreSantiago said:Rediculous indeed.
I have found that using politicly correct terms makes things a lot more awkward than simply saying "black", for example. It throws it out there that you don't want to offend them and that you think you will offend them, it's just awkward for everybody.
And FYI, not every black person is an "African American". Like, what do we call black people living in England? African English? I know people that would call them African Americans simply so they don't call them black, even though they aren't American.