Poll: Prostitution

Recommended Videos

Ignignoct

New member
Feb 14, 2009
948
0
0
Shapsters said:
How many prostitute are prostitutes because they choose to be? Not many, so I don't think it is fair for the woman to get in trouble. Obviously being a pimp should be illegal, becuase they are pretty well slave traders.
And a glorified icon of mainstream Hip Hop culture.

I-RON-Y!
 

Shapsters

New member
Dec 16, 2008
6,077
0
0
T-Blade said:
Do not legalise it, They are too expensive, Come to the UK most of the girls here are free hookers.
Prostitute: One who solicits and accepts payment for sex acts.

(No such thing as a free hooker, that would just make them easy, or hussies.)
 

Zombie_Fish

Opiner of Mottos
Mar 20, 2009
4,584
0
0
I think it should be legalised, but it should have standards.

In the state of Nevada, Prostitution is legal, but there are standards on it. How the prostitutes are treated, how much they earn, standards that help them earn a decent living from what they do. A certain beothel in Nevada (Whose name I can't remember) calls the people working there "Self-employed business women" (or something similar), so a price is set and paid beforehand, they do a health-check on the umm *cough* client, to check for any STIs etc., and they do it in a suit of the client's choice. And this works successfully, and means that the prostitute isn't beaten up by a pimp who then takes most of her money, leaving her with below minimum wage etc. it really is successful.
 

edinflames

New member
Dec 21, 2007
378
0
0
The infamous SCAMola said:
We were debating this issue at schoool, and I thought it would make an interesting topic.
So, I would like to know what my fellow Escapists think of the whole issue.

Do you think that legalising prostitution would be a helpful way of getting rid of the criminal element? If not, why?

Also, what do you moraly think of the whole prostitution concept?
Morally I'm not keen, but I am a realist. Prostitution happens. It has always happened, it always will happen.

Keeping it illegal puts money and the lives of vulnerable - often desperate - women into the hands of organised crime.

Legalisation allows for regulation. Generally speaking the people most vehemently opposed to legal prostitution are religious old women.
 

Ajna

Doublethinker
Mar 19, 2009
704
0
0
Maze1125 said:
Most prostitutes are forced into it by circumstance or some bastard.
Punishing people who are already at the lowest point of their life seems rather pointless.

So no, being a prostitute shouldn't be illegal.
On the other hand, visiting a prostitute, or being a pimp, should be.
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.

I say legalize it, and wrote a 4 page essay on it a year or so ago.

And in response to the many questions I will get: Yes, I would be okay with my daughter being a prostitute, though I would not be happy with it for two reasons, unrelated to the job:

1)It is a low pay job. Hourly, you're making a killing, but considering you don't work a standard 9-to-5 job as a prostitute, you don't really make that much.
AND
2)Considering I'm going into teaching, I would expect any child of mine to go into a job that requires knowledge. Prostitution is a low-qualification job.
 

The Zango

Resident stoner and Yognaught
Apr 30, 2009
3,706
0
41
I'd agree with a few of the people on here. We should legalise it so that we can tax it and make sure the prostitutes are licensed. That way we could (hopefully) contain the STD's that they might have and we may reduce the criminal aspect. That is asuming that the government actually do there jobs.
 
Mar 17, 2009
4,094
0
0
Ajna said:
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.
By that definition the prostitute herself should be considered a pimp.
 

edinflames

New member
Dec 21, 2007
378
0
0
Therumancer said:
I say "No" and feel those who support it do not see the big picture....[rest chopped for sake of my post length]
I agree with a great many of your points. But with strict enough rules you can avoid a lot of the problems of 'putting prostitution in the public eye' (so to speak).

I think that you fail to see the bigger picture though, my friend.
Fact is, prostitution always has and always will exist, legal or not. Do you think that because it is illegal it doesn't exist outside of Nevada? Of course you don't, because the truth is that some people are prepared to pay for sex whilst other people are either willing or desperate enough to sell sex.

Morally I dislike the idea of prostitution, I would never pay for sex and I'd be distraught if a relative or friend of mine decided to sell their body. But consider this: if someone I knew decided to 'go on the game' I would rather they worked for a legal brothel than some back-street pimp or become the property of an organised crime syndicate.

If a trade is legal then it is open to government regulation and investigation. Nevada might have its share of problems but I expect it doesn't have to deal with the abhorrent 'human traffic' trade that pervades the cities of Europe, where girls from poor countries are smuggled into places like London to work in underground brothels as sex-slaves with no hope of escape, no basic human rights and no hope of protection from the law.

For me legal prostitution is simply a case of choosing the lesser of two evils.
 

uncle-ellis

New member
Feb 4, 2009
621
0
0
I personly have no problem with the oldest profession in the world.
Also monkeys do it and there awesome.
 

Ajna

Doublethinker
Mar 19, 2009
704
0
0
The infamous SCAMola said:
Ajna said:
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.
By that definition the prostitute herself should be considered a pimp.
I believe that the definition states "any person other than the prostitute". I don't have the paper on me. Also, prostitutes are punished worse than pimps.

To use a deeply flawed analogy, that's like saying that murderers should be charged with larceny for stealing another persons life. At that point, it doesn't matter.
 

uncle-ellis

New member
Feb 4, 2009
621
0
0
T-Blade said:
Do not legalise it, They are too expensive, Come to the UK most of the girls here are free hookers.
He he, yea we do suck.

But our girls suck more *bud dum dum thing*
 
Mar 17, 2009
4,094
0
0
Ajna said:
The infamous SCAMola said:
Ajna said:
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.
By that definition the prostitute herself should be considered a pimp.
I believe that the definition states "any person other than the prostitute". I don't have the paper on me. Also, prostitutes are punished worse than pimps.

To use a deeply flawed analogy, that's like saying that murderers should be charged with larceny for stealing another persons life. At that point, it doesn't matter.
I think it's a flawed definition.
 

ryai458

New member
Oct 20, 2008
1,493
0
0
ya it should be legal but with a lot of restrictions and rules STD testin ect..
 

Ajna

Doublethinker
Mar 19, 2009
704
0
0
The infamous SCAMola said:
Ajna said:
The infamous SCAMola said:
Ajna said:
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.
By that definition the prostitute herself should be considered a pimp.
I believe that the definition states "any person other than the prostitute". I don't have the paper on me. Also, prostitutes are punished worse than pimps.

To use a deeply flawed analogy, that's like saying that murderers should be charged with larceny for stealing another persons life. At that point, it doesn't matter.
I think it's a flawed definition.
Again, I wrote the paper a year or two ago. I don't have it on me, so I don't have the exact definition. All I remember is my source for it said that the legal definition had been used to convict young children and husbands that combined incomes with their wives of "pimping".
 

Ignignoct

New member
Feb 14, 2009
948
0
0
Ajna said:
Maze1125 said:
Most prostitutes are forced into it by circumstance or some bastard.
Punishing people who are already at the lowest point of their life seems rather pointless.

So no, being a prostitute shouldn't be illegal.
On the other hand, visiting a prostitute, or being a pimp, should be.
The legal definition of pimp is anyone who uses the income of a prostitute. This includes more people than you would think. The child of a prostitute is a pimp (legally) if the food they eat was bought using funds from prostitution. If a man's wife is a prostitute, then if they file for taxes together, it is pimping.

I say legalize it, and wrote a 4 page essay on it a year or so ago.

And in response to the many questions I will get: Yes, I would be okay with my daughter being a prostitute, though I would not be happy with it for two reasons, unrelated to the job:

1)It is a low pay job. Hourly, you're making a killing, but considering you don't work a standard 9-to-5 job as a prostitute, you don't really make that much.
AND
2)Considering I'm going into teaching, I would expect any child of mine to go into a job that requires knowledge. Prostitution is a low-qualification job.
Hookers make bank.

Are you're saying your daughter isn't pretty enough to be a prostitute? How cruel.

Your legal definition is jack-sh*t here when we're talking common sense, which blows away your absurd, stringy straw man argument. The old, flawed definition means nothing when we're debating what the law SHOULD BE.

I hope you get swine flu.

...

Go with Christ.
 

Kajin

This Title Will Be Gone Soon
Apr 13, 2008
1,016
0
0
I wouldn't touch one of those disease farms with even the most reliable of rubbers, but a lot can in fact be gained from legalising it. First of all, we're turning it into a profitable, taxable industry that will overall be much safer for everyone because instead of being forced to do business inside the crime riddled slums in order to hide from the cops, they can obtain protection from cops in pre-designated areas thus eliminating a good deal of the problems that prostitution inherently creates.

Granted, there are still all of those nasty health issues, but honestly they're gonna spread it anyway. We might as well do our part to make it a safer experience for everyone involved.
 

Ignignoct

New member
Feb 14, 2009
948
0
0
Kajin said:
I wouldn't touch one of those disease farms with even the most reliable of rubbers, but a lot can in fact be gained from legalising it. First of all, we're turning it into a profitable, taxable industry that will overall be much safer for everyone because instead of being forced to do business inside the crime riddled slums in order to hide from the cops, they can obtain protection from cops in pre-designated areas thus eliminating a good deal of the problems that prostitution inherently creates.

Granted, there are still all of those nasty health issues, but honestly they're gonna spread it anyway. We might as well do our part to make it a safer experience for everyone involved.
Just say you're not into hookers.

It seems foolish to say that you don't trust physicians and blood-tests conducted on a continual, scheduled basis.
 

CoziestPigeon

New member
Oct 6, 2008
926
0
0
If you legalize ANYTHING it takes away most of the danger. It would be government monitored and thus much cleaner and safer.
 

Lord_Ascendant

New member
Jan 14, 2008
2,909
0
0
Its morally wrong. And it is because of greed for money and Sex that this exists. It combines both into one decadent package. Its basically stamping your one-way ticket straight to hell. Sorry to sound preachy but I do not believe that any woman should be forced to sell her body on the streets.