I think I read that statistically, most people went for rock the most and paper the least.... So of course I always do paper first 
So Im not the only one here that watches them?!twistedshadows said:
I'm not sure, I actually don't watch the show but happened to see a clip of that episode.Lazzi said:So Im not the only one here that watches them?!twistedshadows said:
I must be broken then, because I played a game with a whole room of people circulating and I started with scissors almost everytime, and lost 6 out of 7 times with scissors.Lancer723 said:Because people have perceived success with one of three. So if you win with a scissors, you are much more likely to use scissors again later, in a completely different game. You subconsciously associate winning with one of the three, and thus, use it more/first.piers789 said:For no reason as far as I can make out, I usually go for paper first.
Any budding psychology students want to explain our answers to us?
That would be my guess (as a budding psych student) but I have no physical evidence to back it up, just a theory.
I think we're all avoiding the real unbeatable factor in RPS, though, even if you go up against a nuke.xxhazyshadowsxx said:Ok then, Nuke teamed up with Bug Spray.
If your opponent bitches about it being "Unfair" well.. A nuke just went off.. He's dead..
Unless they're a cockroach themselves, then thats just awkward.
The theory makes sense, you win with one so you'll choose it later. Though what made you choose rock, paper or scissors in the first place? It is just a case of trial and error until you perceive yourself to be winning with one more than the others or is there some other reason?Lancer723 said:Because people have perceived success with one of three. So if you win with a scissors, you are much more likely to use scissors again later, in a completely different game. You subconsciously associate winning with one of the three, and thus, use it more/first.piers789 said:For no reason as far as I can make out, I usually go for paper first.
Any budding psychology students want to explain our answers to us?
That would be my guess (as a budding psych student) but I have no physical evidence to back it up, just a theory.
No, you're right - you're clearly quite the debonair gentleman; refined prosocialite extraordinaire. My bad. Except, of course, for the deliberate attempt to underminine my harmless poll... and then there was the whole violent rape threat. Hmmm.Darth Mobius said:Um, I just worked TWO ten hour days on less than 10 hours of sleep between them. I have ANOTHER ten hour day tomorrow, and I did nothing anti-social, although if you recommend that I wear some Ugg boots ever again I will pull your spine out of your back and then rape you to death with it. I HATE Ugg boots. Furthermore, after ten hours wearing water-proof boots, anything on my feet at all is UNCOOL! I am in bare feet and happy with it.ThatJagoGuy said:Oh. Well... *someone* is getting an unwarranted surprise in the morning. Also, your lack of slippers might explain your initial antisocial approach. I prescribe a healthy dose of slipper-boots; wear two a day for the rest of your life.
Gotta love big bang.Lazzi said:So Im not the only one here that watches them?!twistedshadows said: