If you feel ambitious you could pay cash for an amazon or visa gift card and use that online. Pretty sure Amazons got a bundle for $20 which includes an expansion and a strat guide.marter said:No credit card means no online purchases for me I'm afraid. I also tend to prefer having a physical copy of a game as well, so the digital download copy would be something I'd buy as a last resort, so to speak.Rauten said:Also:
Don't know if you'd consider it a good price or not, but Blizzard sells both the original game and it's expansion, "Brood Wars" in a bundle for 15$, at their digital store.marter said:I've never played it. I didn't have any interest in it when it first came out, and now that I have marginal interest, I can't find anywhere to buy it for a good price.
http://us.blizzard.com/store/details.xml?id=110000124
Maybe I'll just wait for StarCraft II...
company of heroes? defenitly company of heroes, though dawn of war and C&C follow closely indeed.Yokai said:I bought Starcraft. I played it through. Call me a fool, but in all honesty, I think everything Starcraft did, Warcraft III did better. Granted, they had four years to absorb the feedback from Starcraft and make a better RTS. However, I can't help but notice that Starcraft is known the world over as a truly spectacular RTS whereas WC3 is only mentioned occasionally.
Don't get me wrong: I don't think Starcraft is a bad game, or even a mediocre one, I just think it's certainly not the best RTS the world, or even Blizzard, has produced. IMHO: The best proper RTS games ever created are Command and Conquer 3 and Dawn of War.
agreed company of heroes is fantastic. good graphics but requires not that much power (hell even i an play it), great gameplay especiialy with friends and its reasonably well modable.thahat said:company of heroes? defenitly company of heroes, though dawn of war and C&C follow closely indeed.Yokai said:I bought Starcraft. I played it through. Call me a fool, but in all honesty, I think everything Starcraft did, Warcraft III did better. Granted, they had four years to absorb the feedback from Starcraft and make a better RTS. However, I can't help but notice that Starcraft is known the world over as a truly spectacular RTS whereas WC3 is only mentioned occasionally.
Don't get me wrong: I don't think Starcraft is a bad game, or even a mediocre one, I just think it's certainly not the best RTS the world, or even Blizzard, has produced. IMHO: The best proper RTS games ever created are Command and Conquer 3 and Dawn of War.
Company of Heroes is spectacular. However, I think the balance between combat and base building is a little skewed for it to truly be a "traditional" RTS. DoW and CnC3 are just the most Starcraft-like out of my favorites, and I will concede that Starcraft was one of the first games to be recognizable as the RTS games we know today.thahat said:company of heroes? defenitly company of heroes, though dawn of war and C&C follow closely indeed.Yokai said:I bought Starcraft. I played it through. Call me a fool, but in all honesty, I think everything Starcraft did, Warcraft III did better. Granted, they had four years to absorb the feedback from Starcraft and make a better RTS. However, I can't help but notice that Starcraft is known the world over as a truly spectacular RTS whereas WC3 is only mentioned occasionally.
Don't get me wrong: I don't think Starcraft is a bad game, or even a mediocre one, I just think it's certainly not the best RTS the world, or even Blizzard, has produced. IMHO: The best proper RTS games ever created are Command and Conquer 3 and Dawn of War.