It's like asking Dragon Age or Mass Effect. If the developer is good enough then you should enjoy both.
Well of course, but I have this feeling that around 90% of these people including you have only read the title, If you did... just read the full thing.MercurySteam said:It's like asking Dragon Age or Mass Effect. If the developer is good enough then you should enjoy both.
standard high fantasy world? or crazy ass Post apcolyptic wonderland with a retro 50's flvour? and LAZERS???? Ill take fallout based on setting aloneJay Parrish said:Okay so, I was playing Oblivion earlier when my friend called me, just to talk about something (I forgot what) but we ended up talking about the games we were playing, turns out he was playing Fallout: New Vegas.
So after some in depth discussion on how freaking spammy the salamanders are we started to get into a little bit of an argument about which game was better, and I must admit he made some good points.
But it depends on what you like of course, and that is my question. Now I don't mean "Which is better, New Vegas or Skyrim" no I mean which one of the mini series do you prefer?
Like if Bethesda announced they we're going to make the ultimate RPG ever. And it was going to be based around either Fallout or The Elder Scrolls... which would you choose?
actually fallout NV does have axes.... fire axes plus theres a actually a unique one called Knock Knock...does alot of damage (especially in the hands of veronica)LebbyLegs said:That argument could be countered with: Oblivion have fuckin AXES, Fallout does not, Oblivion has Fireballs, Fallout does not, Oblivion has horses- bla bla blaTestECull said:Fallout has assault rifles. Oblivion does not. Fallout has nuclear weapons. Oblivion does not. Fallout has jetpacks(Well, on PC, okay they're mods but bear with me). Obli...you guessed it.
Base it around Fallout. It's just better.
Arguing about the individual items and weapons that for one person may seem fantastic and to another person may turn them off the game completely is invalid because it is based on ones play style.
Gameplay, quests, story etc is what defines whatever game as better in my opinion
And I really can't decide between the two, I love them both but i guess Elder Scrolls win becasue it has more of an EPIC world feel![]()
The little oblivion fanboy in me is screaming out, but im shushing him cos thats a very fair point to make and i felt very much the same as i do in alot of open world rpgs, Its too old a game to worry about now but if you get the chance it might be worth trying again and just focusing 100% on the main plot, ignore every little side quest for your first playthrough or atleast until you get comfortable in the world, That way its not overwhelming and considering you picked up KOTOR you clearly have a good taste in rpgs, and TES are really good once you get past the bullshit.Azaraxzealot said:fallout.
i tried oblivion but quit after 3 hours because it's so big it feels like the world and all its options are suffocating me.
i traded that in for Crackdown 2.
oh. and morrowind also had the same problem. i traded that game in for KOTOR.
i'm not immersed, i'm drowning.