0p3rati0n said:
Kukul said:
0p3rati0n said:
LimaBravo said:
Kukul said:
There is no supernatural.
Just because you can't find explaination for something, doesn't mean it happens against the laws of physics.
I've experienced some highly improbable coincidences and tricks played by my mind, but I was never dumb enough to call it "paranormal", "supernatural" or "magic".
Sorry for being such a buzz-kill.
Ditto
ok let me ask something before I go into something. Are you both atheist?
I am. And?
ok good so let me go on. Why do you think there is no outer power (aka GOD) I think you put god as a person more or less a power. God is infinity, side eight, etc. That's why "he" has always been there/ here. When I get the question why doesn't god help us with our problems. It's because he helps our inner straight. He can help externally. But that's only if you say it was him and his work.
Look at nature it could never happen on it's own. If it did how. Evolution? Ok then how did that happen? the big bang? Ok then how did that happen? dust particles collecting in space where nothing is there? Ok then how did that happen? That's the dead end. That's the part scientists can't figure out and will never will.
Scientist also are trying to find out what powers the power of an atom. That's another thing they will never find out.
So work off that.
There's a few problems here.
The first: You are labeling one side as the "default." Simply because one side doesn't know something, you immediately switch to the other without analyzing the side you're moving to.
The second: You're not analyzing your own position. Let's apply that same logic you use to your side. Look at nature, it could never happen on its own. Okay then, how did that happen? God made it? Okay then, how did that happen? Er. Dead-end on your own side as well.
You label one side as wrong for not knowing what allowed the big bang to happen, but fail to realize that there is no explanation as to how God came into existence either.
---
And these aren't even me arguing for my side, I'm just showing you that your side isn't very convincing at all.
As for the big bang, there is evidence for it. By looking at the paths of all the galaxies that we can see, we can take the small line they've made that we can see, and turn that into a big line (you only need two points to make an entire line), and we've seen that they all would concur at the same point.
Also, a good way to see if a system of knowledge works or not is to see if, in that knowledge system, you can explain anything you encounter with the same statement. If you are able to explain any and all unknown events with a nearly identical statement, and it would make sense according to that knowledge system, chances are the system is bad.
For example: "God did it."
No matter what one says, if a person asks why Mars is red, one could answer "God did it."
Why are trees made of wood? God did it.
Why is the sun yellow? God did it.
Why is the ocean blue? God did it.
Why is it that monkeys and humans are so genetically similar? God did it.
You see?
And the same explanation could not be attached to any two of these according to modern science. We tend to have a sensible, specific explanation for most of the phenomena we witness, and if we don't, we'll try to understand it based on what we do know, and usually, the conclusions we come to make perfect sense. The only problem is getting people to listen with an objective ear, not one that has already taken a side.