Oooo, I don't quite remember that. Remind me in a spoiler tag, will you?corroded said:I thought parts of Saw were actually quite sneaky. I've also laughed at parts of it, quite heavily. I mean, if you've seen Saw 3, towards the end they obviously realise they've actually forgotten to kill off one of the characters and she then goes about doing the stupidest thing possible. Twice.
Yep.-Orgasmatron- said:They're made for people who can only get it up after seeing a bloody neck stump.
It's gore horror, in the best traditions of Hammer horror, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Grindhouse, American Psycho et al. If it's not an appealing niche for you that's understandable but it's a fairly legitimate branch of the horror genre...curlycrouton said:I'm sure many of you have watched films like Saw or Hostel. I myself have watched about a half hour of both. But only a half hour, it's really all I could take.
I can't understand how these films are entertaining. Perhaps I'm being a wimp, but it seems to me to be disgusting torture scene after disgusting torture scene, backed up by a thinly veiled attempt at a plot, created for the sole purpose of warranting all the torture. Every time I attempt to watch one of these films, endeavouring to find out what the appeal behind them is, I end up feeling slightly sickened and horrified that such scenes can ever be branded entertaining.
Don't get me wrong, gore and blood is often necessary to add a sense of realism, or to outline the horrors of war in various films, but when it's just violence for it's own sake, well that seems to me as mindless blood lust, almost animalistic.
So the question I ask you is this. Do you enjoy these films? If so, can you explain the appeal?
There's a large difference between Hostel and Saw. Hostel pretty much is just a bunch of torture scenes. The original Saw - the sequels were all terrible - was fairly philosophical and actually had purposes for the tortures. All the following ones were just more elaborate and gross ways to kill peoplecurlycrouton said:I'm sure many of you have watched films like Saw or Hostel. I myself have watched about a half hour of both. But only a half hour, it's really all I could take.
I can't understand how these films are entertaining. Perhaps I'm being a wimp, but it seems to me to be disgusting torture scene after disgusting torture scene, backed up by a thinly veiled attempt at a plot, created for the sole purpose of warranting all the torture. Every time I attempt to watch one of these films, endeavouring to find out what the appeal behind them is, I end up feeling slightly sickened and horrified that such scenes can ever be branded entertaining.
Don't get me wrong, gore and blood is often necessary to add a sense of realism, or to outline the horrors of war in various films, but when it's just violence for it's own sake, well that seems to me as mindless blood lust, almost animalistic.
So the question I ask you is this. Do you enjoy these films? If so, can you explain the appeal?
That's Saw 2corroded said:A girl walks into a room with a perspex box in the middle. It has the antidote in it. She looks at the box, it has two holes in it. She puts one hand in to grab the syringe and gets her arm locked in by four razor blades. She then puts her free hand into the other hole, which has the same effect. She bleeds to death.
I don't know why they are called "porn" either. It seems to be a misnomer. Personally I like them because I like to see how messed up someone can write a plot and how much of it I can watch before I flinch. I don't think there is anything wrong with watching these types of movies because they are not real. Someone who watches them is as likely to go and torture someone as is someome who plays GTA going to steal a car and shoot people. Highly unlikely in my opinion.bad rider said:I think they are awesome. Never thought they were "porn" though. It's just films that explore a darker side of human nature, that phrase dosen't really do justice anymore since books *cough* twighlight *cough* but it's more like why I like hannibal lecter. Sure the films aren't quite as good as red dragon or silence of the lambs, but they follow along the same lines which make them an intriguing watch.