Poll: Transhumanism: How Far Would You Take It?

Recommended Videos

Daniel Ferguson

New member
Apr 3, 2010
423
0
0
My hearing is shit. My sight, better but I sometimes have trouble focusing on one image. Going into a bank is hell on my eyes, with the clear screens with lots of lines in them. My ability to gain strength is woeful. I would augment or genetically modify these factors, that and my propensity for substance addiction (not necessarily drugs, just everyday substances like sugar and caffeine, alcohol... I'm wired to be a slave to that stuff).
 

Phantom Kat

New member
Sep 26, 2012
121
0
0
3-4 is as far as I'm comfortable with, 5 is as far as I could go beyond that point if there was a strong need for it. Beyond that I wouldn't really consider it "me" as I view both the mind and at least part of the body as a requirement for the "self" though the amount of body I require I am unsure of.

I'm not really scared of death, I just don't want it to happen in the near future.
 

TheUsername0131

New member
Mar 1, 2012
88
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Too far. I want all humans to be like Dr. Manhattan. Maybe even more awesome.
Did your Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice prepare you for a life in a cyberpunk crime thriller?
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
Hmm. Option 5 or 6...

Although I'd rather become something without a permanent physical body.

Then again, I'm also kind of nervous about the nature of conscious thought, so it might never get that far...

Full body replacement at the very least seems about right though.
 

Rowan93

New member
Aug 25, 2011
484
0
0
All the way to the absolute limit. Eventually. I'd take it slow - spend perhaps a million (subjective or sol-standard) years in a human-ish form.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,852
0
0
AS FAR AS I CAN, MAN, AS FAR AS I CAN. NO LIMITS! NO REGRETS!

We've always strived to be all that we can be. Transhumannism allows us the opportunity to become all we WANT to be!
 

TallanKhan

New member
Aug 13, 2009
790
0
0
I would definatley go for 3, and might stretch that to 4 or even 5 later depending on a number of factors, but give me option 3 and I will sign up tomorrow.
 

mateushac

New member
Apr 4, 2010
342
0
0
I'd probably only go as far as number 2, which is actually pretty much what we have today, anyway. I'm impressed with the amount of people who would be willing to go through full body replacement, though.
 

Heronblade

New member
Apr 12, 2011
1,202
0
0
mateushac said:
I'd probably only go as far as number 2, which is actually pretty much what we have today, anyway. I'm impressed with the amount of people who would be willing to go through full body replacement, though.
Nah, the idea of walking around basically as Robocop is quite appealing to many people. Add that to someone that isn't particularly attached to their body parts...

That said, I suspect many would be a little more reluctant to go under the knife if the opportunity actually came. I'd be surprised if anyone here who does not have major medical issues would go past #2 right away. Many would move on as the tech proves itself, but it takes some time to get used to the idea.

What surprises me are the number of people saying they want to go for #6, particularly the way the OP described it. #5 is bad enough in terms of forcing you to question whether or not you are the same person afterwards. With 6, there's no question about it, the being you become has absolutely nothing to do with what you were before. Even if it does end up with your memories, it will have its own motivations, goals, desires and ethics fairly well divorced from yours.
 

mateushac

New member
Apr 4, 2010
342
0
0
Heronblade said:
mateushac said:
I'd probably only go as far as number 2, which is actually pretty much what we have today, anyway. I'm impressed with the amount of people who would be willing to go through full body replacement, though.
Nah, the idea of walking around basically as Robocop is quite appealing to many people. Add that to someone that isn't particularly attached to their body parts...

That said, I suspect many would be a little more reluctant to go under the knife if the opportunity actually came. I'd be surprised if anyone here who does not have major medical issues would go past #2 right away. Many would move on as the tech proves itself, but it takes some time to get used to the idea.

What surprises me are the number of people saying they want to go for #6, particularly the way the OP described it. #5 is bad enough in terms of forcing you to question whether or not you are the same person afterwards. With 6, there's no question about it, the being you become has absolutely nothing to do with what you were before. Even if it does end up with your memories, it will have its own motivations, goals, desires and ethics fairly well divorced from yours.
You have a good point there about people not really willing to go for it should the opportunity come. IMO, though, 6 sounds much more appealing than 5 does. I don't believe the OP meant you would turn into something that's not you (in that case wouldn't you cease to exist anyway?), but rather turn into something "extraphysical", just pure raw information flowing through the universe. If that's what he meant, then I'd be all in for it. If not, then I must agree with you.
 

Heronblade

New member
Apr 12, 2011
1,202
0
0
mateushac said:
Heronblade said:
mateushac said:
I'd probably only go as far as number 2, which is actually pretty much what we have today, anyway. I'm impressed with the amount of people who would be willing to go through full body replacement, though.
Nah, the idea of walking around basically as Robocop is quite appealing to many people. Add that to someone that isn't particularly attached to their body parts...

That said, I suspect many would be a little more reluctant to go under the knife if the opportunity actually came. I'd be surprised if anyone here who does not have major medical issues would go past #2 right away. Many would move on as the tech proves itself, but it takes some time to get used to the idea.

What surprises me are the number of people saying they want to go for #6, particularly the way the OP described it. #5 is bad enough in terms of forcing you to question whether or not you are the same person afterwards. With 6, there's no question about it, the being you become has absolutely nothing to do with what you were before. Even if it does end up with your memories, it will have its own motivations, goals, desires and ethics fairly well divorced from yours.
You have a good point there about people not really willing to go for it should the opportunity come. IMO, though, 6 sounds much more appealing than 5 does. I don't believe the OP meant you would turn into something that's not you (in that case wouldn't you cease to exist anyway?), but rather turn into something "extraphysical", just pure raw information flowing through the universe. If that's what he meant, then I'd be all in for it. If not, then I must agree with you.
A being of raw energy would have the issues I speak of. Right now, your thought patterns are guided by a physical web, your senses are limited to what your nervous system is designed to detect, and your sense of the passage of time is likewise determined. Getting rid of that framework entirely will inevitably lead to massive changes in perspective and personality.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
18,440
11,525
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
Watching the grey hairs sprout up, feeling my damaged knee complain now and then... I have to say that Option 4 looks more and more appealing.

[small](And no, I've never taken an arrow to any part of my anatomy, thanks for asking.)[/small]
 

remnant_phoenix

New member
Apr 4, 2011
1,439
0
0
There is no one I trust to augment my body/mind in any of this regard, and I don't see why so many people are so relaxed at the idea.

Personally, I prefer the Iron Man approach: kick-ass tech that is WEARABLE AND REMOVABLE. And I know someone would try to counter with "But he has tech in his body! The arc-reactor in his chest!" Yes, yes he does. But that doesn't need to be implanted in his body to make the suit work, an external arc-reactor in the suit, rather than in the man, works just fine (see: War Machine).

It's not really represented on the poll, but that's my limit: as long as the tech is easy-on/easy-off and I don't have to trust a doctor to install/repair/maintain something that's in my personal meatbag, I'm in. Otherwise, count me out.

Oh, and screw trans-humanist immortality. This world isn't worth living in for more than 70-90 years.
 

Heronblade

New member
Apr 12, 2011
1,202
0
0
The Rogue Wolf said:
Watching the grey hairs sprout up, feeling my damaged knee complain now and then... I have to say that Option 4 looks more and more appealing.

[small](And no, I've never taken an arrow to any part of my anatomy, thanks for asking.)[/small]
Wouldn't dream of asking. That joke was beaten to death the same day it was invented.

Regardless, I feel somewhat compelled to mention that completely reversing the effects of old age and other sources of tissue damage should be quite possible without moving beyond Option 2. Immortality may or may not be possible that way, but being physically comparable to a extraordinarily healthy twenty five year old at the age of 150? easy
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
is there an option for people who don't think having any native human biomass is no longer important at option 5 if full memory transference is an option, but consider the human form still useful enough that they aren't going to start going full tentacle like 6 implies
 

Char-Nobyl

New member
May 8, 2009
784
0
0
TheUsername0131 said:
I would be able to play chess by myself more effectively. Also I'll require purchasing an additional toothbrush, bus ticket, and I'll be occupying two bus seats, to the annoyance of other commuters. My food intake would be doubled. Also I'll be developing asynchronous developmental disorders relating to hyper-lateralization of brain function. I shall call it Doppelgänger Dissociation.

You'd think the hairdressing costs would double but no. I'll be able to cut my own hair now.
Here's what I asked:
Char-Nobyl said:
"That leads me to the followup question: if you fail to vanish when your clone is created, then is he 'you' only by your death and disappearance?"
Your response as quoted above didn't answer any part of that question.
 

Moloch Sacrifice

New member
Aug 9, 2013
241
0
0
Heronblade said:
A being of raw energy would have the issues I speak of. Right now, your thought patterns are guided by a physical web, your senses are limited to what your nervous system is designed to detect, and your sense of the passage of time is likewise determined. Getting rid of that framework entirely will inevitably lead to massive changes in perspective and personality.
Again, I don't know if I speak for anyone else, but what you describe is exactly what I'm after. Having a physical human form, with all the carry overs and primitive survival instincts, is counterproductive to pure, completely rational and unbiased thought. I don't want my life goals to be manipulated by a desire to procreate; even in a modern society, the instincts that helped our ancestors survive are already becoming more and more burdensome and irrelevant. To find a release from that, and find a greater sense of perspective that is beyond my current, primitive cognitive power, is an offer I simply cannot turn down.
 

TheUsername0131

New member
Mar 1, 2012
88
0
0
Char-Nobyl said:
TheUsername0131 said:
I would be able to play chess by myself more effectively. Also I'll require purchasing an additional toothbrush, bus ticket, and I'll be occupying two bus seats, to the annoyance of other commuters. My food intake would be doubled. Also I'll be developing asynchronous developmental disorders relating to hyper-lateralization of brain function. I shall call it Doppelgänger Dissociation.

You'd think the hairdressing costs would double but no. I'll be able to cut my own hair now.
Here's what I asked:
Char-Nobyl said:
"That leads me to the followup question: if you fail to vanish when your clone is created, then is he 'you' only by your death and disappearance?"
Your response as quoted above didn't answer any part of that question.
If you have read my not very subtle response, you would garner that I am implying they would both be me.

Your response as quoted above doesn?t acknowledge that.
 

sumanoskae

New member
Dec 7, 2007
1,526
0
0
I'd be down for pretty much anything as long as it didn't replace my memories or inhibit my ability to feel, so I'd say 4, just to be safe.

I'd also rather still appear human, if only because social interaction would be made easier.

I'm not against neurological enhancements, so long as they don't change who I am on a fundamental level. If I could just upload Kung Fu or hacking expertise into my brain, I would totally do it.

P.S: I can keep my junk, right?