what webcomics? like ones that involves the women running around in skimpy outfits?thaluikhain said:Not an uncommon problem. I think Yahtzee said much the same about certain types of people who make webcomics, some time back. Something something "because they've heard of female empowerment but don't know what it is".
I think it was the one were the "this loser is you" male characters get humorously bludgeoned by the female characters, cause the female characters are all tough and empowered and stuff.Vault101 said:what webcomics? like ones that involves the women running around in skimpy outfits?thaluikhain said:Not an uncommon problem. I think Yahtzee said much the same about certain types of people who make webcomics, some time back. Something something "because they've heard of female empowerment but don't know what it is".
ah yes..I know that stereotype, the girl with attitude who drags the mild mannered hero around by his jock strap and threatens to hit himthaluikhain said:I think it was the one were the "this loser is you" male characters get humorously bludgeoned by the female characters, cause the female characters are all tough and empowered and stuff.
I don't need to consume the whole product to know it was badly made. The opinions of people I trust have led me to believe that Twilight is poorly written, and has many problems with plot, characterization, and pacing. Maybe it's unfair to condemn it before trying it myself, but when the evidence is so clear that I wouldn't enjoy it one bit, I don't think it's unreasonable of me to decide that it's bad.Fancy Pants said:"I never read them or watched the movies."TheVampwizimp said:Yeah, never read them, never watched more than bits and pieces. A few years ago I was a bit caught up in the negativity toward Twilight. I just get frustrated when an obviously bad piece of fiction gets really popular and makes tons of money. If I can write better stories than Twilight, and I know I can, than why aren't I a millionaire?
"They are obviously bad."
"I can write better stories."
I'm confused. If you didn't read the books, how do you know you can write better? If you didn't watch the films, how do you know they are "obviously bad?"
And I decided to post simply to bump the thread! Muahahahaha! I can't wait to have a LONG and uh... meaningful discussion on Twilight for the next several pag-ppffffft I'm kidding. Fuck that even as a joke.Zhukov said:ARRGGH! The OP isn't ever going to fix that typo are they?
It's going to sit there. Festering. Taunting me. Every time I open the off-topic forum it will be there.
Just waiting.
And then there's 50 Shades of Grey. One of the trashiest, crepeiest, stalkeriest novels ever conceived. The ladies at work swooned over that book for months. It blows my mind that when it's a rich/attractive character doing it borderline rape is romantic. Not a single one seems to know that it was just rewritten Twilight fanfiction.Vault101 said:I remember Nostalga chick (on her book show I think) said that mabye writers like Meyer who are religous have this idea as to what women are suposed to be/do and try to match that up with our "modern" ideas of feminism but it just doesn't workthaluikhain said:Meyer has problems deciding what's romantic and what's abusive or stalkery.
she also said twilgiht isn't as bad as the trash thats out there (namely Tigers Curse)
Oh, I know. I've read plenty accounts of them in action. I've just never actually met anyone like that, and had to go out of my way to find said accounts (twilightsucks.com and such), and all the fans of the series I have met have been perfectly nice people who just so happened to be Twilight fans. The hatedom, on the others hand, was freaking everywhere.GabeZhul said:Oh trust me, "Twihards" existed and still exist. Two of my uni acquaintances were like that. The "They ruined the movies because one side character had a different eye color than in the books!" and "How can you say the series is not the best thing since lukewarm water you HERETIC?!" kind. If you think the hatedom was bad, you should feel lucky that you never truly met the fandom...
All right. You don't have to value my point of view. I just didn't think I needed to explain every aspect of my experience with Twilight in order to offer an opinion on it. I even admitted that I used to hate it just because of knee-jerk responses, but my opinion has been tempered with time and a bit more exposure to it.Fancy Pants said:I'm sensing less an informed opinion and more a knee-jerk reaction. You said you've not read any of it and only seen small portions of the films, not mentioning the "people you trust" until questioned further. You also say that you "don't need to consume the whole product" as if you had actually tried to read the novels, but we know you haven't. This makes it seem like an argument not in good faith.TheVampwizimp said:I don't need to consume the whole product to know it was badly made. The opinions of people I trust have led me to believe that Twilight is poorly written, and has many problems with plot, characterization, and pacing. Maybe it's unfair to condemn it before trying it myself, but when the evidence is so clear that I wouldn't enjoy it one bit, I don't think it's unreasonable of me to decide that it's bad.Fancy Pants said:"I never read them or watched the movies."TheVampwizimp said:Yeah, never read them, never watched more than bits and pieces. A few years ago I was a bit caught up in the negativity toward Twilight. I just get frustrated when an obviously bad piece of fiction gets really popular and makes tons of money. If I can write better stories than Twilight, and I know I can, than why aren't I a millionaire?
"They are obviously bad."
"I can write better stories."
I'm confused. If you didn't read the books, how do you know you can write better? If you didn't watch the films, how do you know they are "obviously bad?"
Given peoples' demonstrated love for both hating on popular things and using untrue language to make a point in forums, especially this one, I'm left leaning towards the safe bet.
Now see, what you did there was had the wrong expectations from the film!tm96 said:It was actually called Lava under New York. The scene that annoyed me was apparently having lava underwater while a boat is above causes the boat to somehow explode. The lava from what was shown wasn't nowhere near the boat and the sea wasn't even boiling.That scene could be a metaphor for my suspension of disbelief after that scene.Vegosiux said:Well, no. No, it's not. There's "The Human Centipede", for example. Now THAT is the worst thing ever.tm96 said:I suggest you have a look at the Nostalgia Critic's editorial video "Is Twilight the Worst Thing Ever?" to get a deeper view of some perspective on it.
That's pretty much every disaster movie ever. However, if I had to hazard a guess...."The Day After Tomorrow"? That one is really obnoxious with liberty-taking.But I did recently I got angry at a disaster movie for taking an artistic liberty with science.