Poll: What do you think of furries?
- Thread starter Lenoh
- Start date
It's an exceptionally broad group of people. Really now. You can't classify the Furry group as all whackjobs or all normal people. But when the Ratio of loud whackjob to a normal person is 3:1. Well, it gets a little weird, if not a bit funny at times.
I've got a lot of problems with the group, yeah... To me, it's something you grow out of when you no longer need the crutch. But with that said, I know a considerable amount of people who are furries, and some of them are hardcore into it too. I don't mind them. They're good people. But when the ones who are foaming at the mouth come at me, well, come at me bro.
I've got a lot of problems with the group, yeah... To me, it's something you grow out of when you no longer need the crutch. But with that said, I know a considerable amount of people who are furries, and some of them are hardcore into it too. I don't mind them. They're good people. But when the ones who are foaming at the mouth come at me, well, come at me bro.
Well I am one so that sort of answers that. Though I really do have a problem with "fursuits" I don't know why exactly, but they frighten me.
Furry does not bother me at all. I actively engage in at least some of the net culture, roleplay characters online, etc. It doesn't feel like a fetish to me, it's more of a hobby. Like D&D.
Furry as a fetish seems to me to be not much different than the people who like cat ears, or maid outfits, or the rest of the things considered "moe" in otaku culture. It's a mostly superficial difference that taken at face value does not inherently require sexualization. That said, one of those famous rules states something along the lines of: If it exists, it is someone's fetish.
Soyeah...Furry as a fetish is more a function of people being sexual creatures in general than the concept itself.
Furry as a fetish seems to me to be not much different than the people who like cat ears, or maid outfits, or the rest of the things considered "moe" in otaku culture. It's a mostly superficial difference that taken at face value does not inherently require sexualization. That said, one of those famous rules states something along the lines of: If it exists, it is someone's fetish.
Soyeah...Furry as a fetish is more a function of people being sexual creatures in general than the concept itself.
I vote that option! ^_^arragonder said:
My vote: "I am one."
-I don't fursuit (yet...), but I like the community (even though I don't talk at all), have a fursona, and anthropomorphic art is awesome.
Deal with it.
The same way I feel about people into S&M, they're average people with a fetish I don't understand. Not my thing, but I'm not going to judge you for it.
I meant something that grows specifically out of the furry fandom.Tree man said:
Sonic doesn't count; the character didn't specifically emanate from the furry fandom, and Sonic fandom's a whole subculture in and of itself. Even furries will shy away from the really psycho Sonic fans.