Poll: What weapons will you use in a zombie apocalypse?

MadMage

New member
Aug 12, 2010
16
0
0
Well I live on base sooooo I'd have armored vehicles and military grade weapons if the army gets desperate. Otherwise I'd go across the street from my school to the liquor store and make some molotove cocktails. Then next door to the liquor store to the gun store for weapons. Then next door to the popeye's for food. Then TWO doors down to the library for a safe shelter and entertainment. Gotta love how poorly they plan out the shopping center across the street from a Middle / High School.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
mrdude2010 said:
The weapons you all will use is none because you will die immediately. You probably have no training in survival, firearms, or any specific melee weapon. Stop pretending like you would do anything other than feed horribly. These threads are so stupid.
What about those of us who have extensive training and experience in all three? We're on these threads too you know.
Kecunk said:
Being a member of the armed forces i do know how to use a firearm properly, and could probably get one much easier than most, there is actually a weapons vault in the barracks i live in (though i have no idea where they keep the keys for the damn thing).

All that being said if it came down to it i would still prefer melee weapons, its just so much more satisfying when you can actually feel you enemy fall before the force of your weapon. its also great for releasing all that pent up aggression the pre-apocalyptic society frowns upon.
You win this thread sir, you just win.
The Heik said:
Suki_ said:
I think its because of the sheer speed and efficiency of guns. Sure the bow is more silent but it requires more skill, has smaller range, and kills stuff a lot slower.
Bows actually don't require that much skill over guns (it really comes down to basic positioning and due practice). I'm experienced with both a .22 rifle and a compound recurve bow, and considering the zombie apocalypse as a weapons setting the bow just makes more sense in the long run. Guns may have more fire speed, but that's very rarely going to see use as just spraying rounds into your undead target will mean that you're just wasting bullets. Aimed shots are the only way to ensure your target goes down efficiently, and seeing as most people aren't accurate with most firearms past 50 feet, range doesn't really come into the equation either (unless of you have a sniper rifle, but that brings a whole other mess of factors into play). And lets face it, when the zombie apocalypse comes around, gun stores are going to be among the first places raided for supplies. Ammo WILL become scarce, and every round you miss with a gun is one you can't put into a zombie to save yourself. The simple fact that you can collect your arrows after combat (or easily build new ones if you can't recover the ones you've fired) means that you'll be able to fight your enemy from range long after a gun's ammo would run out.
I don't know where people get this illusion that guns are hard to use accurate. I can and have taught people how to hit a head sized target at 100 yards 7/10 times in less than 10 minutes. It's easy. Even free hand with iron sights your going to hit that same target just as often at 50 yards. Are you talking about handguns? those are kinda hard to learn to shoot, but it would still take less than an hour to learn how to hit a target reliably at 50 yards, probably half that time.

Also, arrows are harder to make than you think, especially if you're using a common compound bow. A compound bow won't fire a wooden arrow very well, the extra weight leads to a much slower arrow speed. Also, while making the shaft is easy, you still need a head sharp and hard enough to go through skull, which means stone(and very few types of stone make good points) or metal(which requires massive amounts of heat to shape). Also, putting fletching on an arrow is hard, very hard. There's a reason that back in the day, people were payed to make arrows instead of everyone just making their own. They are time consuming and difficult to make.
Vicarious Reality said:
Frankly i do not think i would do very well with my guns, though if i had to leave i would probably take a gun as well as my chinese japanese long sword
My #20 HI Sirupati Khukri is nice but probably too heavy and short
Not sure if i would take my Remington shotgun or my 223 Howa rifle, i could carry more cartridges for the rifle but it is heavier and far more difficult to use at close range... and more difficult to reload
I'd go with the remington shotgun(if it's the common pump action shotgun they make), those things are virtually impossible to jam.
Ian Fan said:
chain with a weapon tied to one end and weighted second end.
awesome answer, but the closest weapon to what you're talking about(the kusarigama) is very hard to use, making me think that you might want to go with something a little easier to handle. Unless of course you are experienced with such a weapon, in which case you are awesome beyond reason.
Shaved Apple said:
I wouldn't want to get up close I'd be afraid of getting their blood on me and catching the disease after beating them with a bat or something. I'd just stay hidden somewhere with a sniper rifle. Probably make a game out of it.
Ever thought about using a mask from paint-balling? They would prevent virtually any amount of blood from getting in/around you eyes, nose, and mouth.
 

Broady Brio

New member
Jun 28, 2009
2,784
0
0
I'd use a katana and chop those zombies. Dur-hur-hur.

In all seriousness, if I'm in the UK, I'd go with melee weapons. If I'm in the US, I'd go with the guns.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
spartan231490 said:
The Heik said:
Suki_ said:
I think its because of the sheer speed and efficiency of guns. Sure the bow is more silent but it requires more skill, has smaller range, and kills stuff a lot slower.
Bows actually don't require that much skill over guns (it really comes down to basic positioning and due practice). I'm experienced with both a .22 rifle and a compound recurve bow, and considering the zombie apocalypse as a weapons setting the bow just makes more sense in the long run. Guns may have more fire speed, but that's very rarely going to see use as just spraying rounds into your undead target will mean that you're just wasting bullets. Aimed shots are the only way to ensure your target goes down efficiently, and seeing as most people aren't accurate with most firearms past 50 feet, range doesn't really come into the equation either (unless of you have a sniper rifle, but that brings a whole other mess of factors into play). And lets face it, when the zombie apocalypse comes around, gun stores are going to be among the first places raided for supplies. Ammo WILL become scarce, and every round you miss with a gun is one you can't put into a zombie to save yourself. The simple fact that you can collect your arrows after combat (or easily build new ones if you can't recover the ones you've fired) means that you'll be able to fight your enemy from range long after a gun's ammo would run out.
I don't know where people get this illusion that guns are hard to use accurate. I can and have taught people how to hit a head sized target at 100 yards 7/10 times in less than 10 minutes. It's easy. Even free hand with iron sights your going to hit that same target just as often at 50 yards. Are you talking about handguns? those are kinda hard to learn to shoot, but it would still take less than an hour to learn how to hit a target reliably at 50 yards, probably half that time.
But here's the thing: How many people of the 6.7 billion on this planet are trained with firearms? A whole lot less than those who aren't. That means being able to find someone who can preperly teach is going to be a slim prospect depending on where you are in the world (so most people are going to half to self teach and we both know that's going to be rife with trial and error)

And while yes practice makes perfect, training with a gun unfortunately provides 2 major problems. 1) however much of the ammo you use for training is going to be ammo that you can't use on a legitimate target (and as I've already established, in the Zombpocalypse ammunition is going to become scarce as the factories that produce them stop functioning due to a high concentration of eaten brains) an 2) every shot expended has the potential to draw zombies towards you, and I'd rather not have the undead attack whilst I'm taking a nap after a long hard practice session.

However with a bow and arrow you can practice all day long with no worry for expending resources or that you'll draw distant zombies towards you. In the long run is just more practical.

spartan231490 said:
Also, arrows are harder to make than you think, especially if you're using a common compound bow. A compound bow won't fire a wooden arrow very well, the extra weight leads to a much slower arrow speed. Also, while making the shaft is easy, you still need a head sharp and hard enough to go through skull, which means stone(and very few types of stone make good points) or metal(which requires massive amounts of heat to shape). Also, putting fletching on an arrow is hard, very hard. There's a reason that back in the day, people were payed to make arrows instead of everyone just making their own. They are time consuming and difficult to make.
Compared to trying to making bullets they are a breeze. Making rounds requires that you know how to smith and at least have a good amount of knowledge in chemistry to be able to make gunpowder (Again asuming you can find the ingredients for it). Besides, I've made arrows before during my scout years, and while they don't hold a candle to modern arrows, they can at least hit the target with some degree of accuracy if you have experience with bows (and a crappy arrow is still better than no bullets). And most of the materials you need for them are pretty easy to find in most countries.

Again it really comes down to the long term. Would you rather have a really good weapon for the first few months, or a decently good weapon for the entire ordeal?


spartan231490 said:
Shaved Apple said:
I wouldn't want to get up close I'd be afraid of getting their blood on me and catching the disease after beating them with a bat or something. I'd just stay hidden somewhere with a sniper rifle. Probably make a game out of it.
Ever thought about using a mask from paint-balling? They would prevent virtually any amount of blood from getting in/around you eyes, nose, and mouth.
By the way, I can tell you right off that won't work. those masks are designed to allow the player to breathe whilst being able to take the primary force of a paintballball. I've taken way too many shots to the face and tasted way too much of the stuff inside to not know that those masks don't stop spray and splatter for shit.

Besides, paintball shops are pretty rare in comparison to more readily available equivalents. In both my hometown and the city I'm currently residing in there is only one paintball shop apiece, and one of them is smack dab downtown (a place no sane Z-survivor would want to go to).

Honestly the best bet for face protection against splatter is ski goggles and some fabric from a wind jacket (worn kinda like a scarf on your face from shoulders up as to prevent lower angle splatter). They don't let liquids seep through and they're light enough to wear for extended periods of time uninterrupted.
 

Lev The Red

New member
Aug 5, 2011
454
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
i'm from Virginia.

it's a rifle round from the Russian Empire. it was made for the Mosin-Nagant, but it's also used in Soviet and Russian sniper rifles and some machine guns. it's EXTREMELY common because the Soviets made millions of Mosins before, during, and after WW2. you can buy them in "spam cans" of about 450 for about $80.
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Winchester .22 lever action rifle with suppressor and subsonic ammo to go with a Ruger Mk III with a suppressor, using the same ammo.

.22 is light and small leading to the ability to carry more, easily, and subsonic ammo will do the classic .22 trick of going through the front of the skull but not being able to go through the back, thus bouncing around and destroying the brain.
With a suppressor and subsonic ammo, both guns are quiet enough you could fire them in a small concrete room without hearing protection and still not hurt. This is essential in a zombie apocalypse because you don't want to alert every zombie in 2km of your position.

I'd have a long bowie knife as a backup/melee weapon.
 

Cpu46

Gloria ex machina
Sep 21, 2009
1,604
0
41
I have a pickaxe in my shed that is my go to weapon for any apocolapse scenario. It has a long handle, a pointed spike on one end of the pick and a flatter blade on the other, also it is designed to impart the most kinetic energy possible when swung. It is versatile and can be used for demolition of stairs if I need to baricade myself on an upper floor. Even if it breaks it should be relatively easy to jury rig a replacement out of what's left. I also have a dustmask and goggles to deal with the organic material spray produced my using it on zombies. Not that I'm preparing or anything, I needed the mask for metal smithing class and the goggles were from chemistry.

I think I would do fairly well with it.
 

TotalerKrieger

New member
Nov 12, 2011
376
0
0
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
i'm from Virginia.

it's a rifle round from the Russian Empire. it was made for the Mosin-Nagant, but it's also used in Soviet and Russian sniper rifles and some machine guns. it's EXTREMELY common because the Soviets made millions of Mosins before, during, and after WW2. you can buy them in "spam cans" of about 450 for about $80.
I would go for my Mosin Nagant too, M44 carbine specifically, sturdy, reliable, accurate and enough ammo available to last a lifetime. Although having a SKS-D (or an AK for you lucky bastards in the US) on hand might be useful if you ever got trapped in a confined space...although on second thought perhaps I am underestimating the usefulness of the mighty spike bayonet.
 

Josufu

New member
Jun 13, 2010
56
0
0
I would have at least one of each. Melee weapons would merely be tools used for accessing supplies and/or fortifying, such as pry bars, hammers, etc. Ranged tools would obviously be more specialized, but would use lighter ammunition and hopefully be fitted with suppressors.
 

StormShaun

The Basement has been unleashed!
Feb 1, 2009
6,948
0
0
I would like to have both, maybe multiple of both.

For me I would like two Katanas and two pistols (Magnums maybe)

The bad part would be that I would have to clean the guns, get ammo for both guns and have enough to last me in that horrible world until I an improve it or give up for another gun.

The bad part for the swords is that indeed they can get stuck, you have to take good care of them and you have to get close.

Still I would like swords for the most pat. :D
 

Deadyawn

New member
Jan 25, 2011
823
0
0
Of the two options presented? Definetly melee. I've never held a gun in my life so I very much doubt that one would be of any use to me. Plus, ammo scaricty is a big turn off there.

If I could choose something else? Just a car. That seems like it would be significantly more useful then like say a baseball bat.

Actually, my zombie plan is to just get out to sea, maybe head down to antartica. That should be relatively safe.
 

karcentric

New member
Dec 28, 2011
1,384
0
0
I like how every "What will you do during the zombie disco" turns into a gun thread...

Be sensible, how many of you would really survive past the first week? You know after several nights of patchy sleep, second rate food and constantly being on the run from are mindless, tireless, emotionless legion?

Still sticking with original answer though, join the horde and get cheap group bookings.
 

BanZeus

New member
May 29, 2010
107
0
0
I would probably eventually use a rope on myself. Before that I'd use whatever is available/practical.
 

Ryotknife

New member
Oct 15, 2011
1,687
0
0
i do not see why people would use melee if it is a virus zombie infection. Getting even a little bit of their blood or spit on you will infect you. I mean, if im immune okay.

If i had to use a melee weapon...something with a bit of reach that requires the least amount of force to neutralize without getting stuck. Baseball bat is a good one, wooden sword would actually be better.

Even a mace (non spikey) would be excellent.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
Screw that, I'd take a goddamned TANK! Even if I run out of ammo I can still squish the zombies under my mighty treads.
What about gas? Those things guzzle metric tons of the stuff.
 

Peter Trueb

New member
Jan 10, 2012
2
0
0
bow or crossbow would be most effective i think you can out range the zombies and retrieve your ammo if your not dealing with a horde plus if in real need you can make your own ammo but because it still needs ammo and has a minimum range as well i would also take with me a pole arm like a spear or large 2 hand ax. the true practical upside to both being relative silence.

that being said the real problem is surviving. living in the northern U.S. i would get my friends and go north to Canada and with any luck Alaska up there i give it 1 maybe 2 winters before the weather just deals with the problem for me and the reason i say Alaska is because it has more guns than people to fire them and a good boating and fishing triad plus boat would become the safest transport to gather more survivors.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
erttheking said:
- Bladed weapons (such as an axe) can get stuck
You do realize that chopping people is not the same as chopping wood right? Waraxes are very hard to get stuck in someone. Add that it is rotting flesh and you won't get stuck. Warpicks would only get stuck in the armor but not the flesh.

For your question, both.
 

Drummie666

New member
Jan 1, 2011
739
0
0
If there is one thing I've learned about zombies, it's that shotguns always do the trick.
Honey, get the M1014.