Poll: What weapons will you use in a zombie apocalypse?

Recommended Videos

NiceC

New member
Jan 8, 2012
6
0
0
I have 3 short term plans for both fast and clever zombies as well as slow and stupid.
Really for me it would be transport would be my weapon but my carry wepaon would be a bow and arrow as I know where to get them and I'm a ok shot (yea right). But really umilmted ammo and the ammo can be collect agian and used a melee.
I would always have a melee though because it is * never going to let you down (never going to give you up)
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
spartan231490 said:
In any case, the weapon's job is simply to open an avenue of escape. In the zombie apocalypse, no one wins a fight. You just waste ammo and energy, make noise, and risk injuries you won't have the equipment or knowledge to treat.

Zombies are like water. If it's in your way, you use tools and tricks to get over, around, or through it. You don't try to fight water.
My problem with this strategy is that it's naive to think you will be able to scavenge food forever(with the number of people I'm planning to have with me, and it goes double for my area), and with the number of people I'll have with me, I can't find enough food in the wilderness which means I have to grow it which means I have to stay in one place and grow it. The up-shot is that I have quite a bit of medical knowledge as well as how to find many medicinal plants in my area, even one that functions as a weak anti-biotic.

So my strategy involves going to a place that takes at least two full days to reach and that gives most people(and therefore zombies) absolutely no reason to go there. Then use armed patrols to eliminate any enemies that come too close[/quote]

Doesn't sound any different from my strategy. The entire point of my strategy is that your weapons should be geared toward escape. What you do once you escape is up to you, but the plan should be to find somewhere with minimal traffic and some means of sustainable food and water.

Even once you have that farm of yours, you still want to deal with zombies up close. After all, if they're not close, they're not a threat. Using a powerful enough weapon to shoot a zombie that's far away is guaranteed to create enough noise that you risk drawing more. Keep that up, and your farm will get overrun -- and the harder you fight to defend it, the more you'll attract -- meaning you'll either have to abandon it or die with it.
 

Konaerix

New member
May 19, 2010
289
0
0
Umm...I collect wooden swords, so I guess it's melee for me.
I'd go all High School of the Dead on those zombies!
 

Shock and Awe

Winter is Coming
Sep 6, 2008
4,645
0
0
If I could only have one I'd take the gun. I could use a .22 or maybe .223 because I have a crap ton of ammo for both and have a good deal of rifle experience. If there are enough zombies to run though my ammo then there is no chance I could survive with a melee weapon because I'd be swarmed. That being said, my ideal with prep would be an AK-47(or any variant) because of it's reliability and ammo availability, I'd also have a crowbar because it has many uses and it's an epic blunt weapon.
 

Shaved Apple

New member
May 17, 2012
235
0
0
I wouldn't want to get up close I'd be afraid of getting their blood on me and catching the disease after beating them with a bat or something. I'd just stay hidden somewhere with a sniper rifle. Probably make a game out of it.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Dastardly said:
spartan231490 said:
My problem with this strategy is that it's naive to think you will be able to scavenge food forever(with the number of people I'm planning to have with me, and it goes double for my area), and with the number of people I'll have with me, I can't find enough food in the wilderness which means I have to grow it which means I have to stay in one place and grow it. The up-shot is that I have quite a bit of medical knowledge as well as how to find many medicinal plants in my area, even one that functions as a weak anti-biotic.

So my strategy involves going to a place that takes at least two full days to reach and that gives most people(and therefore zombies) absolutely no reason to go there. Then use armed patrols to eliminate any enemies that come too close
Doesn't sound any different from my strategy. The entire point of my strategy is that your weapons should be geared toward escape. What you do once you escape is up to you, but the plan should be to find somewhere with minimal traffic and some means of sustainable food and water.

Even once you have that farm of yours, you still want to deal with zombies up close. After all, if they're not close, they're not a threat. Using a powerful enough weapon to shoot a zombie that's far away is guaranteed to create enough noise that you risk drawing more. Keep that up, and your farm will get overrun -- and the harder you fight to defend it, the more you'll attract -- meaning you'll either have to abandon it or die with it.
Except that I can't run away from my farm, I need it. And it's not guaranteed to do anything. My spot is over 10 miles of heavy forest from even so much as a road, I could fire off .50 cals for fun and it wouldn't be heard anywhere near civilization, which means there will be very few zombies or humans that would be attracted by gunfire. Of those that would be, I want them to be drawn in, it means they will approach the location of the shooting, a location prepared to be easily defended, as opposed to showing up in the fields or the shelter areas.
 

Smeggs

New member
Oct 21, 2008
1,251
0
0
Melee.

To quote an animation I once saw, "Swords don't run out of bullets."

And neither do aluminum bats.
 

Ardure

New member
Nov 23, 2009
44
0
0
Weapons... yes weapons are important... but what is also important is defense... So I suggest full chain mail because you can't bite through that. Also weight wise its fairly reasonable... well compared to plate lol. Then with good protection you can really use whatever weapon you want. Just keep that flesh cover and unbitable and you're fine.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Ardure said:
Weapons... yes weapons are important... but what is also important is defense... So I suggest full chain mail because you can't bite through that. Also weight wise its fairly reasonable... well compared to plate lol. Then with good protection you can really use whatever weapon you want. Just keep that flesh cover and unbitable and you're fine.
Full chain mail is over 40 pounds. Have you ever carried 40 pounds for any distance? It's hell. True hell. It'll also slow you down like hell and increase your chances of being swarmed. And that's usually not much more than a short sleeved shirt, leaving lots of places to bite. Also, you ignore the likelyhood of other people being dangerous, bullets go through chain mail like butter. Against fast zombies it would probably be worth it, but against slow zombies the weight is just too much of a disadvantage. The best defense is keeping a good distance away from them
 

MadMage

New member
Aug 12, 2010
16
0
0
Well I live on base sooooo I'd have armored vehicles and military grade weapons if the army gets desperate. Otherwise I'd go across the street from my school to the liquor store and make some molotove cocktails. Then next door to the liquor store to the gun store for weapons. Then next door to the popeye's for food. Then TWO doors down to the library for a safe shelter and entertainment. Gotta love how poorly they plan out the shopping center across the street from a Middle / High School.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
mrdude2010 said:
The weapons you all will use is none because you will die immediately. You probably have no training in survival, firearms, or any specific melee weapon. Stop pretending like you would do anything other than feed horribly. These threads are so stupid.
What about those of us who have extensive training and experience in all three? We're on these threads too you know.
Kecunk said:
Being a member of the armed forces i do know how to use a firearm properly, and could probably get one much easier than most, there is actually a weapons vault in the barracks i live in (though i have no idea where they keep the keys for the damn thing).

All that being said if it came down to it i would still prefer melee weapons, its just so much more satisfying when you can actually feel you enemy fall before the force of your weapon. its also great for releasing all that pent up aggression the pre-apocalyptic society frowns upon.
You win this thread sir, you just win.
The Heik said:
Suki_ said:
I think its because of the sheer speed and efficiency of guns. Sure the bow is more silent but it requires more skill, has smaller range, and kills stuff a lot slower.
Bows actually don't require that much skill over guns (it really comes down to basic positioning and due practice). I'm experienced with both a .22 rifle and a compound recurve bow, and considering the zombie apocalypse as a weapons setting the bow just makes more sense in the long run. Guns may have more fire speed, but that's very rarely going to see use as just spraying rounds into your undead target will mean that you're just wasting bullets. Aimed shots are the only way to ensure your target goes down efficiently, and seeing as most people aren't accurate with most firearms past 50 feet, range doesn't really come into the equation either (unless of you have a sniper rifle, but that brings a whole other mess of factors into play). And lets face it, when the zombie apocalypse comes around, gun stores are going to be among the first places raided for supplies. Ammo WILL become scarce, and every round you miss with a gun is one you can't put into a zombie to save yourself. The simple fact that you can collect your arrows after combat (or easily build new ones if you can't recover the ones you've fired) means that you'll be able to fight your enemy from range long after a gun's ammo would run out.
I don't know where people get this illusion that guns are hard to use accurate. I can and have taught people how to hit a head sized target at 100 yards 7/10 times in less than 10 minutes. It's easy. Even free hand with iron sights your going to hit that same target just as often at 50 yards. Are you talking about handguns? those are kinda hard to learn to shoot, but it would still take less than an hour to learn how to hit a target reliably at 50 yards, probably half that time.

Also, arrows are harder to make than you think, especially if you're using a common compound bow. A compound bow won't fire a wooden arrow very well, the extra weight leads to a much slower arrow speed. Also, while making the shaft is easy, you still need a head sharp and hard enough to go through skull, which means stone(and very few types of stone make good points) or metal(which requires massive amounts of heat to shape). Also, putting fletching on an arrow is hard, very hard. There's a reason that back in the day, people were payed to make arrows instead of everyone just making their own. They are time consuming and difficult to make.
Vicarious Reality said:
Frankly i do not think i would do very well with my guns, though if i had to leave i would probably take a gun as well as my chinese japanese long sword
My #20 HI Sirupati Khukri is nice but probably too heavy and short
Not sure if i would take my Remington shotgun or my 223 Howa rifle, i could carry more cartridges for the rifle but it is heavier and far more difficult to use at close range... and more difficult to reload
I'd go with the remington shotgun(if it's the common pump action shotgun they make), those things are virtually impossible to jam.
Ian Fan said:
chain with a weapon tied to one end and weighted second end.
awesome answer, but the closest weapon to what you're talking about(the kusarigama) is very hard to use, making me think that you might want to go with something a little easier to handle. Unless of course you are experienced with such a weapon, in which case you are awesome beyond reason.
Shaved Apple said:
I wouldn't want to get up close I'd be afraid of getting their blood on me and catching the disease after beating them with a bat or something. I'd just stay hidden somewhere with a sniper rifle. Probably make a game out of it.
Ever thought about using a mask from paint-balling? They would prevent virtually any amount of blood from getting in/around you eyes, nose, and mouth.
 

Broady Brio

New member
Jun 28, 2009
2,783
0
0
I'd use a katana and chop those zombies. Dur-hur-hur.

In all seriousness, if I'm in the UK, I'd go with melee weapons. If I'm in the US, I'd go with the guns.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
spartan231490 said:
The Heik said:
Suki_ said:
I think its because of the sheer speed and efficiency of guns. Sure the bow is more silent but it requires more skill, has smaller range, and kills stuff a lot slower.
Bows actually don't require that much skill over guns (it really comes down to basic positioning and due practice). I'm experienced with both a .22 rifle and a compound recurve bow, and considering the zombie apocalypse as a weapons setting the bow just makes more sense in the long run. Guns may have more fire speed, but that's very rarely going to see use as just spraying rounds into your undead target will mean that you're just wasting bullets. Aimed shots are the only way to ensure your target goes down efficiently, and seeing as most people aren't accurate with most firearms past 50 feet, range doesn't really come into the equation either (unless of you have a sniper rifle, but that brings a whole other mess of factors into play). And lets face it, when the zombie apocalypse comes around, gun stores are going to be among the first places raided for supplies. Ammo WILL become scarce, and every round you miss with a gun is one you can't put into a zombie to save yourself. The simple fact that you can collect your arrows after combat (or easily build new ones if you can't recover the ones you've fired) means that you'll be able to fight your enemy from range long after a gun's ammo would run out.
I don't know where people get this illusion that guns are hard to use accurate. I can and have taught people how to hit a head sized target at 100 yards 7/10 times in less than 10 minutes. It's easy. Even free hand with iron sights your going to hit that same target just as often at 50 yards. Are you talking about handguns? those are kinda hard to learn to shoot, but it would still take less than an hour to learn how to hit a target reliably at 50 yards, probably half that time.
But here's the thing: How many people of the 6.7 billion on this planet are trained with firearms? A whole lot less than those who aren't. That means being able to find someone who can preperly teach is going to be a slim prospect depending on where you are in the world (so most people are going to half to self teach and we both know that's going to be rife with trial and error)

And while yes practice makes perfect, training with a gun unfortunately provides 2 major problems. 1) however much of the ammo you use for training is going to be ammo that you can't use on a legitimate target (and as I've already established, in the Zombpocalypse ammunition is going to become scarce as the factories that produce them stop functioning due to a high concentration of eaten brains) an 2) every shot expended has the potential to draw zombies towards you, and I'd rather not have the undead attack whilst I'm taking a nap after a long hard practice session.

However with a bow and arrow you can practice all day long with no worry for expending resources or that you'll draw distant zombies towards you. In the long run is just more practical.

spartan231490 said:
Also, arrows are harder to make than you think, especially if you're using a common compound bow. A compound bow won't fire a wooden arrow very well, the extra weight leads to a much slower arrow speed. Also, while making the shaft is easy, you still need a head sharp and hard enough to go through skull, which means stone(and very few types of stone make good points) or metal(which requires massive amounts of heat to shape). Also, putting fletching on an arrow is hard, very hard. There's a reason that back in the day, people were payed to make arrows instead of everyone just making their own. They are time consuming and difficult to make.
Compared to trying to making bullets they are a breeze. Making rounds requires that you know how to smith and at least have a good amount of knowledge in chemistry to be able to make gunpowder (Again asuming you can find the ingredients for it). Besides, I've made arrows before during my scout years, and while they don't hold a candle to modern arrows, they can at least hit the target with some degree of accuracy if you have experience with bows (and a crappy arrow is still better than no bullets). And most of the materials you need for them are pretty easy to find in most countries.

Again it really comes down to the long term. Would you rather have a really good weapon for the first few months, or a decently good weapon for the entire ordeal?


spartan231490 said:
Shaved Apple said:
I wouldn't want to get up close I'd be afraid of getting their blood on me and catching the disease after beating them with a bat or something. I'd just stay hidden somewhere with a sniper rifle. Probably make a game out of it.
Ever thought about using a mask from paint-balling? They would prevent virtually any amount of blood from getting in/around you eyes, nose, and mouth.
By the way, I can tell you right off that won't work. those masks are designed to allow the player to breathe whilst being able to take the primary force of a paintballball. I've taken way too many shots to the face and tasted way too much of the stuff inside to not know that those masks don't stop spray and splatter for shit.

Besides, paintball shops are pretty rare in comparison to more readily available equivalents. In both my hometown and the city I'm currently residing in there is only one paintball shop apiece, and one of them is smack dab downtown (a place no sane Z-survivor would want to go to).

Honestly the best bet for face protection against splatter is ski goggles and some fabric from a wind jacket (worn kinda like a scarf on your face from shoulders up as to prevent lower angle splatter). They don't let liquids seep through and they're light enough to wear for extended periods of time uninterrupted.
 

Lev The Red

New member
Aug 5, 2011
454
0
0
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
i'm from Virginia.

it's a rifle round from the Russian Empire. it was made for the Mosin-Nagant, but it's also used in Soviet and Russian sniper rifles and some machine guns. it's EXTREMELY common because the Soviets made millions of Mosins before, during, and after WW2. you can buy them in "spam cans" of about 450 for about $80.
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Winchester .22 lever action rifle with suppressor and subsonic ammo to go with a Ruger Mk III with a suppressor, using the same ammo.

.22 is light and small leading to the ability to carry more, easily, and subsonic ammo will do the classic .22 trick of going through the front of the skull but not being able to go through the back, thus bouncing around and destroying the brain.
With a suppressor and subsonic ammo, both guns are quiet enough you could fire them in a small concrete room without hearing protection and still not hurt. This is essential in a zombie apocalypse because you don't want to alert every zombie in 2km of your position.

I'd have a long bowie knife as a backup/melee weapon.
 

Cpu46

Gloria ex machina
Sep 21, 2009
1,604
0
41
I have a pickaxe in my shed that is my go to weapon for any apocolapse scenario. It has a long handle, a pointed spike on one end of the pick and a flatter blade on the other, also it is designed to impart the most kinetic energy possible when swung. It is versatile and can be used for demolition of stairs if I need to baricade myself on an upper floor. Even if it breaks it should be relatively easy to jury rig a replacement out of what's left. I also have a dustmask and goggles to deal with the organic material spray produced my using it on zombies. Not that I'm preparing or anything, I needed the mask for metal smithing class and the goggles were from chemistry.

I think I would do fairly well with it.
 

TotalerKrieger

New member
Nov 12, 2011
376
0
0
Lev The Red said:
spartan231490 said:
Lev The Red said:
my Mosin and it's bayonet. i have about 400 rounds, plus about 400 empty cases and the materials needed to reload about 800 cases. that, combined with just how common 7.62x54r is, makes me think i'll be ok.
Dude, where do you live? I'm a gun nut and I'd never even heard of this round, you don't see it much in rural America.
i'm from Virginia.

it's a rifle round from the Russian Empire. it was made for the Mosin-Nagant, but it's also used in Soviet and Russian sniper rifles and some machine guns. it's EXTREMELY common because the Soviets made millions of Mosins before, during, and after WW2. you can buy them in "spam cans" of about 450 for about $80.
I would go for my Mosin Nagant too, M44 carbine specifically, sturdy, reliable, accurate and enough ammo available to last a lifetime. Although having a SKS-D (or an AK for you lucky bastards in the US) on hand might be useful if you ever got trapped in a confined space...although on second thought perhaps I am underestimating the usefulness of the mighty spike bayonet.