No, it means this is a self-selecting sample. People who think they will do well are more likely to take this test, and people who actually did well are more likely to post their results. Not to mention anyone is free to make up whatever inflated score they like; there's no honesty requirement here (no offense to the people who did post). Also, I don't know whether IQ tests take age or gender into account when scoring, but I do know that the final result is supposed to be completely independent of those factors. You should have the same IQ now as you did at age 2.williebaz said:Only 7% of the people here scored average or lower, I wonder if that means gamers are smarter than regular people.
zeldakong64 said:Over 9,000!
Correlation doesn't equal causation, especially in the realm of social sciences.williebaz said:Only 7% of the people here scored average or lower, I wonder if that means gamers are smarter than regular people.
Yes, but his sentence was talking about correlation, not causation.Frankster said:Correlation doesn't equal causation, especially in the realm of social sciences.williebaz said:Only 7% of the people here scored average or lower, I wonder if that means gamers are smarter than regular people.
I've taken that into account but stillVeret said:No, it means this is a self-selecting sample. People who think they will do well are more likely to take this test, and people who actually did well are more likely to post their results. Not to mention anyone is free to make up whatever inflated score they like; there's no honesty requirement here (no offense to the people who did post). Also, I don't know whether IQ tests take age or gender into account when scoring, but I do know that the final result is supposed to be completely independent of those factors. You should have the same IQ now as you did at age 2.williebaz said:Only 7% of the people here scored average or lower, I wonder if that means gamers are smarter than regular people.
Oh, and I'm fairly sure there have been a couple IQ test threads before this one. I know because my ego made me click on those too.
EDIT: Check it out, I figured out how to manipulate the banner. Just look at me getting smarter:
Free IQ Test [http://www.free-iqtest.net]
Free IQ Test [http://www.free-iqtest.net]
Free IQ Test [http://www.free-iqtest.net]
Whee!
You should do it again. IQ test also measures intellectual age. So its easier to get a higher score when you are a kid (and harder when you are like 30 or 40). I remember I got 167 when I was 9. 10 years passed and I didn't kill anyone. They totally had to be wrong.Epicurus said:Mine is 163, which I think I mentioned in a previous thread about intelligence. It is from a whole bunch of official testing that was done on me when I was a kid.
Often, those who do badly at IQ tests are the first to say thisRadeonx said:High enough to know that IQ doesn't mean anything.
IQ simply shows how good you are at IQ tests.
[a href="http://www.nagcbritain.org.uk/parents.php?id=71"]Read this[/a]NeedAUserName said:I got 139 in that test... That can't be right, I'm basically failing every subject I'm doing right now...