Indeed, and that would of course have to take place between consenting adults; but so do any and all sexual practises, including the more "ordinary" ones (if such a thing can even be talked about in regard to sexuality; but let's go with adults who view their consenting partner as another human adult). So the "furry" stuff doesn't add any concerns which didn't already exist, and is thus entirely harmless and unproblematic on its own.AnkaraTheFallen said:...
True, though it would also cover people who want to have sex with someone wearing cat ears for example.
Yeah... I was just giving an example of how furry can be in real life though. But anyone is free to enjoy whatever they like as long as no one is hurt and anyone involved is ok with it.Imperator_DK said:Indeed, and that would of course have to take place between consenting adults; but so do any and all sexual practises, including the more "ordinary" ones. So the "furry" stuff doesn't add any concerns which didn't already exist, and is thus entirely harmless and unproblematic on its own.AnkaraTheFallen said:...
True, though it would also cover people who want to have sex with someone wearing cat ears for example.
Contrast with vorarephilia, which certainly add something of its own that would be extremely harmful if ever practised in real life.
But they would be aroused by eating a dead animal, that's not "normal".Corjha said:Y'know if you combine furry, vore and necro you get...a completely normal person. Someone who likes to eat dead animal.
Fair enough, I just thought you were implying that Furry was the stranger of the 2.CM156 said:I look it this way. Vore, to me, is about 5 times weirder. However, I deal with furries at least ten times as often. Thus, furry is twice as bad as vore to me.Dexiro said:Their are a lot of annoying furries but that doesn't mean it's the stranger fetish, just a more annoying one. People being eaten alive is a lot stranger.CM156 said:Furry is far, far worse. This might just be because furries are far more vocal about "fursicution"
This might just be me being an old man, but I want to shout at both groups "KEEP IT TO YERSELVES"
Amen to that.AnkaraTheFallen said:Yeah... I was just giving an example of how furry can be in real life though. But anyone is free to enjoy whatever they like as long as no one is hurt and anyone involved is ok with it.Imperator_DK said:Indeed, and that would of course have to take place between consenting adults; but so do any and all sexual practises, including the more "ordinary" ones. So the "furry" stuff doesn't add any concerns which didn't already exist, and is thus entirely harmless and unproblematic on its own.AnkaraTheFallen said:...
True, though it would also cover people who want to have sex with someone wearing cat ears for example.
Contrast with vorarephilia, which certainly add something of its own that would be extremely harmful if ever practised in real life.
Okay, that is much weirder. Sorry TC.Dimitriov said:Vorarephilia (often shortened to vore) is a sexual fetish and paraphilia where arousal occurs from the idea of being eaten or by the process of eating. The fantasy may involve the victim being swallowed alive, and may or may not include digestion. Since the fetish is hard to achieve in real life, it is more commonly enjoyed through pictures, stories, videos, and video games. It may be seen as a variation on macrophilia.
There ya go.
Combining those 3 would be someone that likes to have sex with their dead animal before they eat it, and they're sexually aroused by each of those acts. Though you'd have to swap furry with zoophilia.Corjha said:Y'know if you combine furry, vore and necro you get...a completely normal person. Someone who likes to eat dead animal.