I was kind of taking it as which genre has the lowest lows, rather than which genre has no redeeming qualities. At least that's how I gave my answer on here before...tony2077 said:i can't really say anything other then the people who answer this make me sick there is gems good games and crap in all genres
To be fair what I have seen of them is incredibly poorly written and everyone really does look like they dress in the darkest cave in the universe and close their eyes when they shop for new clothes too. They also all seem to have the same combat system I find incredibly dull. Select the most powerful attack I have that works with the asshole of the hour's weakness, and repeat until I run out of Mana, in which case use a potion and start again. And if I really want to get tactical, use one guy exclusively for healing. This works with with all CRPGs I've ever played too, except you just constantly spam all your abilities. Not all of them fall into this obviously, such as Valkyria Chronicles which seems kind of Wormsish minus the humor (not that I'll ever know, I don't have a PS3).Steppin Razor said:Which genre has the worst games? Point-and-click adventure games. Seriously, go to your local store that sells PC games and take a look to see if you can find some of the horrendously bad games. For every Sam & Max there are at least 15 Big Rigs equivalents.
Don't question it, you'll just get confused. Besides, I'm about 90% certain that most of the people saying JRPGs have only ever played one or two FF games and watched some Yahtzee videos.Durxom said:Wait...=S...So we have a thread almost every other day either complaining about there being too many shooters, the lack of good shooters, the fact that everyone is trying to copy and go with the bland "realistic" war shooter that again everyone complains about, and then somehow the most said thing in a worse genre discussion is JRPG?.........what?
Going to assume you missed the 3 and put a 2, because what 2 learned from in 1 and improved on, 3 did away with presumably because Molyneux doesn't really understand why his games sell. If in fact you did mean 2 then I guess I proved that we don't in fact all acknowledge it as crap.IamSofaKingRaw said:I find this an interesting topic. We all can acknowledge that terrible games have come out over the years *coughfable2cough*...excuse me.
NeutralDrow said:You realize this is a pointless question, right?
The answer is "whichever genre I don't like." After all, if that genre had any good games, I would like it, right?
IamSofaKingRaw said:I find this an interesting topic. We all can acknowledge that terrible games have come out over the years *coughfable2cough*...excuse me. But I'd like to hear your opinion on the genre that has the WORST games. For me its definately the Racing genre.
Tons of half ass games come out to try to compte with the big boys (Forza and GT) but many are just flat out shitty
Nope, heck I should of just flat out put it in bold and red text. Fable 1 (The Lost Chapters is the one I played) is head over tails better than Fable 2 (and after 2 I didn't bother getting 3). Fable 1 had more magic, actually had armor, better quests (not kind you use your dog to dig up treasure?), BOSSES, a more interesting story with better characters and a more diverse world.bushwhacker2k said:Going to assume you missed the 3 and put a 2, because what 2 learned from in 1 and improved on, 3 did away with presumably because Molyneux doesn't really understand why his games sell. If in fact you did mean 2 then I guess I proved that we don't in fact all acknowledge it as crap.IamSofaKingRaw said:I find this an interesting topic. We all can acknowledge that terrible games have come out over the years *coughfable2cough*...excuse me.
I don't know that I could rightly say any one genre has more bad games than another. I kind of agree on JRPGs in a way, because it seems like in some games the combat is the same as it's been since Final Fantasy 1 and I just don't get interested. But on the flipside I can't write them all off since I enjoy some of them.
Honestly I do dislike sports, racing and fighting games. I don't necessarily think they're bad, but it seems like a lot of the time they suffer from what many people accuse the FPS genre of suffering from; remaking games with a different tileset and upping the graphics and selling it for 60$ a pop. I can't judge them individually, as I'm sure some games do things interestingly, but it really seems like a lot of them are just remakes.
I know some racing games have a function where the goal is not in fact to reach a certain point before other vehicles but to cause as much damage as possible, which sounds like fun, so as I said before, not writing them all off.
Not my fault. It had everything, even an other option. The Escapist decided to eat it though during the thread making process.BlindMessiah94 said:Missing poll is missing is misleading.
OT: Sports
I'm sorry but they are just glorified roster updates for $60 a year.
Lol, those are legitimate reasons, I admit. I had some trouble with Fable 1 because it always felt a little vague, but at the same time the fact that you never really understand everything was something that made it interesting, whereas in Fable 2 everything is displayed to you almost immediately. I also agree Fable 2 was immensely easy, Fable 1 was harder but I still found it immensely easy if I abused the shield spell, I had maxed all my spells and abilities before I left the Hobbe Cave.IamSofaKingRaw said:Nope, heck I should of just flat out put it in bold and red text. Fable 1 (The Lost Chapters is the one I played) is head over tails better than Fable 2 (and after 2 I didn't bother getting 3). Fable 1 had more magic, actually had armor, better quests (not kind you use your dog to dig up treasure?), BOSSES, a more interesting story with better characters and a more diverse world.bushwhacker2k said:Going to assume you missed the 3 and put a 2, because what 2 learned from in 1 and improved on, 3 did away with presumably because Molyneux doesn't really understand why his games sell. If in fact you did mean 2 then I guess I proved that we don't in fact all acknowledge it as crap.IamSofaKingRaw said:I find this an interesting topic. We all can acknowledge that terrible games have come out over the years *coughfable2cough*...excuse me.
I don't know that I could rightly say any one genre has more bad games than another. I kind of agree on JRPGs in a way, because it seems like in some games the combat is the same as it's been since Final Fantasy 1 and I just don't get interested. But on the flipside I can't write them all off since I enjoy some of them.
Honestly I do dislike sports, racing and fighting games. I don't necessarily think they're bad, but it seems like a lot of the time they suffer from what many people accuse the FPS genre of suffering from; remaking games with a different tileset and upping the graphics and selling it for 60$ a pop. I can't judge them individually, as I'm sure some games do things interestingly, but it really seems like a lot of them are just remakes.
I know some racing games have a function where the goal is not in fact to reach a certain point before other vehicles but to cause as much damage as possible, which sounds like fun, so as I said before, not writing them all off.
Other than FFXIII, Fable 2 was he biggest disappointment to me EVER. I didn't even mention the 5-6 hour story mode or the terrible coop, the nonexistence of a boss, or even the fact that the game is stupidly easy. I beat it in on my first playthrough in 4 hours and did not die. Later on I found out on the internet that you CAN'T die.
*bleep* that *bleep* game