Poll: Who really wants a new console?

[Anthony Wells]

well ocne they are released..hopefully i will have the money for it by then 2014 or so seems decent for release dates 2013 more likely. if i cant afford them im gonna avoid the escapist and other gaimng sites like the plague until i get a ps4. why? because lord knows i dont need to have it flaunted in my face about the "current gen gaming" again took me 3 years into the ps3's life before i got my hands on one and i wont be doing that again while being forced to look at them.


i said i dont wnat new consoles yet. but that doesnt mean they shouldnt be brought. I personally dont want them but my personal opinion should not stop tech advancement.

 

[longboardfan]

This generation, the major advances were in graphics at the expense of game play mechanics. I'd rather a few more years of graphical stagnation to force developers to use some other means of making their games stand out. Like actually making a good game?

 

[Frybird]

My opinion depends on execution, if we have a method of play that innovates and actually offers something fundamentally different and engaging than to what we currently have, I'm all for it. If the idea is to clone the entire current generation just to add some suitably large sounding jargon-filled number to the whatever-drive. Then I'll pass on the spending large amounts of money on nothing but a glorified glorified glorified PlayStation One.

Well that sums it up well for me too.

The jump from...let's say Playstation 1 to Playstation 2 was rather significant because suddenly we could get games that just weren't possible before, not only in terms of graphics but often in just about every technical sense.

The jump from Xbox (given that it was slightly more advanced than the PS2 and already had a hard drive and online services) to Xbox 360 was significant too, without a doubt, but already much less than in the generation before. The most important change that is attributable to better hardware was the shift to HD graphics, and MAYBE the use of more advanced physics models, but i felt there were much less games that wouldn't be, at least in THEORY, possible on a Xbox or Gamecube.

I'm still happy that we got this console generation, don't get me wrong, BUT:
I look at current high end PC graphical benchmarks and although there is of course a difference to what consoles can do, it's not really a giant, mindblowing step as was the switch to HD graphics. It just isn't THAT impressive.

As such, new consoles would need an Evolution not only in what games look like. It would need to evolve in ways that suit games that aren't possible yet.
Wich not only is tricky challenge to wrap my head around, there's also the problem that i don't see very many publishers and developers being willing to step up to the challenge, not for lack of crativity, but because it will cost more, and the games market is currently risky enough when it comes to the big productions.

(The Wii U might be a step in this direction, but i honestly think it's a very unfocused one that rather goes for an "jack of all trades" approach by trying to mash together previous successes that could possibly backfire into having a system that no one really knows what to do with, developers and gamers alike.)

So yeah:
New console: Great, but only when everyone is on the same boat when it comes to "new"

 

[DoomyMcDoom]

Because new consoles are fucking expensive, and the worlds still sort of in that recession.
Also current gen games can go for another solid 2 years, 2014 seems like a reasonable amount of time to introduce a new generation of consoles.
Also it seems the only people who want new consoles are PC gamers, and their only justification is usually just "better graphics" We've reached that point where we dont necessarily need better graphics because most games already look amazing.

Actually, the reason I want new ones is more to do with processing power and I play games on my PC when I have the choice to. When current games make the consoles chug, despite all the tricks used to render less like narrow FoV and large portions of a screen being covered up by weapons consoles still slow down to near unplayable levels when graphical rendering is pushed.

This is not a "better graphics" argument as much as it is a "consoles need more processing power" argument

Notice how I used the word usually. I know that theres a good reason for PC gamers to want a new console but in most cases it usually amounts to them wanting better graphics.
Also as a console gamer its hard to feel sympathy for PC gamers, I dont want you guys to the short end of the stick, but I really dont have the cash to buy a new console anytime soon

Then suck it up, so what if YOU don't have the cash right now, just don't buy it till you do. Just because you personally cannot get something RIGHT NOW shouldn't be a reason to make those who can get one right away and those who have even a basic gaming computer, who've had to keep playing a majority of games made for hardware from 2004, be unable to enjoy the emergence a new generation in console technology.

Yes god forbid Id rather come out with the better deal, what a stupid way of thinking that no one else shares obviously. Its not just me, a lot of console gamers dont want a new system because they dont have the money and theyre fine with the games we have now.

Besides a new console generation wouldnt really change anything Im betting, it would be good for a year or so then PC gamers would be back to crying about how much console gaming is holding them back, not just that but its also a bad business decision for companies like Sony and Microsoft, can they really risk selling a new console, knowing fully well theres a good chance of it completely bombing? May I remind you that for the majority of its life the PS3 has actually been making a loss? The only thing that would definitely change things for PC gamers is if more developers started making PC exclusive games, and if C ports were made with a PC in mind.

Note that the Ps3 contains processing technology of a make made SPECIFICALLY for the product, due to it not being widespread technology it costs more to produce, that and they also had to recall it for certain reasons due to a rushed release, so those issuaes can't have helped their overal proffit margin, the 360 is cheaper to make, but also has flaws in it's construction that cause a large number of them to experience critical hardware failures, maybe if the developers actually made a completely functional product in the first place it would be less costly for them in the long run eh?

you may not think 6 years is a long time for technological advancement, but when it comes to system power overall, well yeah it would make a pretty huge difference to everything, we've gone from the 1800 series ATi cards to the 7900 series, yes, that is 6 entire generations of video cards, not to mention Nvidia's huge leaps in technology, and the number of enhanced physics processors and whatnot being added into our hardware.

And yes it would help if more developers made pc exlusive titles, but with such a market split, it's not likely to happen, after all consoles make up a huge part of the gaming industry, so like it or not, consoles hafta get stronger for pc gamers to get any games that take advantage of the technology available now, or even a year ago.

I mean to a certain extent I don't mind the lack of change either, since it means that for the forseeable future I can play everything on the market on high or near enough, on my $500 rig, that I frankenbuilt and upgraded a couple times way back... but I would definately like to see the industry pick up the pace hardware wise, after all the computer components that are in consoles are out of production for the most part, so it may make them even more expensive to manufacture than they were a few years back.

Consoles are essencially a pc with a chopped down OS streamlined for only gaming, since they use pretty much all the same parts now, once a part becomes completely obsolete and thus drops out of mainstream production, then companies like sony and microsoft are essencially subsidizing the production of something a company has left in the dust, and isn't even selling to other customers at this point, therefor taking up space and materials that could be going towards better parts, which would make them more money per volume.

So in other words it may actually be more economically viable for console manufacturers to upgrade their hardware to a new generation sooner than later.

 

[Angry Camel]

I'd like to see an update, although it shouldn't be rushed. What they are pulling off with current consoles is quite good, but there's quite a leap they can make now in regards to hardware. I can understand your concern, though, OP. Also, I hope Microsoft learned not to skimp on the quality of the joint soldering and cooling systems (I think there was a soldering issue, let me know if it was something else) or people might not take very kindly to them.

 

[Frybird]

I want new gen you know why..

Maybe if given more raw power and given dare i ask "easier dev tools" *cough*sony..
people might to be able to risk trying games OTHER than FPS (mainly the COD clones)

I want new games new Ips fresh ideas and bigger adventures... what i get right now is 5 hour bullet fests.

Thats less an technical issue (although it plays a part) as it is more a financial one.

Games cost a lot of money these days, and it's kinda hard to predict how much a game will sell before making it. As such, devs prefer what sells well.

That said, it's not THAT hard to find games with a good amount of playing time that aren't FPS

 

[Cyrus Hanley]

I got my PlayStation 3 in 2008, so I'm hoping to get at least another two years out of it before the next big thing comes out and makes it obsolete.

 

[Conza]

With the announcement of a new Xbox (and possibly Playstation, though I've heard rumors of Sony not debuting a new console), I have to ask; why? Why do we need another console? I've become accustomed to the way my Xbox360 works and do not look forward to having to upgrade to the new Xbox(720?). Maybe I'm just the odd man out on this issue, but I feel like so much more could be done with the current technology.

By the way, a lot of this comes from my hatred of Kinect, and for some reason I feel that the new Xbox will use a lot of the motion feature, which would be a deal breaker for me.

So, what do you want? The current generation, or the next?

OMG, I'm in the minority on this?

PEOPLE WAKE UP!

2006 was SIX YEARS AGO. Fark, I mean, its way way WAAAAY overdue.

Look, I won't buy it, because I bought my PS3 in 2009, but it should be here for christmas this year, and its late, it'd be late if it came for christmas last year, but crickey.

There are so many things it could do, a dedicated 4GB VRAM card with DX11, 12GB of system ram, 500 and 750GB HDDs, maybe 128SSDs.

But above all, a faster blu-ray player, so we can load games without having to install most of it, or making a cup of coffee between scenes.

The consoles were old 18-24 months after they came out, both of them, one isn't even Full HD, and its still pretending its a 'current' console? Please. They're both jokes now, and its dispicable that they haven't already replaced them, its way overdue, just get it out here already.

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

I always enjoyed new gen consoles, but for me this current gen has been the same as last gen except with better graphics. Apart from the sandbox games like Fallout, GT and Elder Scrolls games - everything else is more of the same but prettier. I just cant see the point in a new 720/PS4 if we are just going to be playing he same games. Compare Doom to COD - everything has become smaller and maps are corridor based but atleast the graphics look nice.

I for one dont want to spend £300/£400 on a new console just to play a prettier version of COD.....but a prettier but more open world COD game set in WW2 would be a day one purchase. When they release the 720 or PS4 i want new experiences as well as the old familiar ones.

I want a WOW factor, like when i played my PS1 for the first time and watched that Manta Ray swimming around.....just amazed me.

 

[samuraiweasel]

Couldn't care less tbh, but it might improve your graphics a mite...

 

[ph0b0s123]

I do so that my PC games will not be things designed to only run on 5 year old hardware rather than taking advantage of the advancements since then. I mean for crying out loud mobile phones will have DirectX 11.1 support this year.

 

[silasbufu]

I don't think I'm gonna get a new console.

Besides, I just got a pretty good gaming PC and got into using Steam and I must say I'm liking it a bit more (not trying to start a flame-war, if you're into that, quote someone else).

 

[Glademaster_v1legacy]

I just want the next console gen whenever it comes out to have enough power so I don't have lag in my single player games. Hopefully they will cop on and give it enough power as well to have a constant 60FPS rather than 30FPS well at least when needed.

 

[Auron225]

Im generally a bit behind everything when it comes to this. I only got a PS3 last year and still only have 2 games for it. Ive barely played any games of this generation at all. I dont really have the money for a new console either so I vote no - I'd really love a few more years to not worry about buying any consoles and trying to catch up with games.

Sadly it looks like I'll be needing to get a 3DS at some point soon... some awfully good-looking games seem to be coming out for it.

EDIT: In addition, what will a new console gen actually give if I may ask? Aside from prettier graphics and more processing power? Honestly, Im happy with the capabilities of the current gen in both those regards. The last couple of gens had more perks - playing online, an update in graphics when it was sorely needed, motion controls (not saying its always good but at least its different), etc. What'll be special about the PS4/Xbox720?

 

[Arakasi]

I want a new console to come out so I can wait for 5 years to get it when it's cheap... Again.

 

[Hollywood koal]

This cycle has been so long. I for one cannot wait for the new consoles. With each new console comes greater functionality and greater graphics. Who really buys a PS2 game if it is offered for $10more on the PS3? no one!
Expenses for gaming has always been and always will be a con, so for me it really has no bearing on needing newer consoles.
While playing games i can feel them hitting the ceiling of the consoles. You can feel it when all the games start getting a similar look and feel. I call it a console bump, and the only way out and over it is newer consoles with new ways of making games. Besides, I would rather feel wistful and have new games than longing.

 

[theskadudeguy]

As long as we don't all go to Cloud based stuff I'll be fine. I'm a collector at heart and would hate to only own things that don't physically exist...

 

[Custard_Angel]

I'm not keen on another $500 price tag.

As far as I'm concerned, no contender of the current generation has earned its keep.

There's good games across the board, but no console has proven itself as being a worthwhile purchase.

 

[BreakingHax]

i would love new gen console or even removing consoles bcus of the multiplatform games is just getting worse on the ports with FPS cap and shorting on the rendering the consoles have to do.

 

[CoL0sS]

Not opposed, thought I question the necessity of it. If their aim is to create something more than just a graphics powerhouse, I'm all for the immediate generation switch. But, it's more likely to be another graphics update with motion control/3D/touchscreen capabilities with false promises of backwards compatibility P). Besides, have we really seen many gameplay innovations with this generation(and no, I don't count motion control)? There's also a question whether game developers are prepared for that change. It would be nice to shorten that painfully awkward period of them adjusting to new hardware. Developers have just gotten comfortable with this generation, pushing it's hardware capabilities to the max. However that also revealed all those restrictions that 6 year old components have. Price is also a huge factor. Hardware is cheap, but making new consoles is expensive and a lot of people wouldn't be able to afford them with world economy being what it is. Perhaps now is not the right time, but they haven't even announced them yet. In 18 months or so when that change becomes a (possible) reality, or we at least have more information, we can argue the purpose of it all. Waiting makes it all the more sweeter. In the meantime I'll get some more use out of my PS3.