Over the last few days I've been noticing little graphical issues like that, and it does add up after a bit. I just may have to edit my first statement. I graphical upgrade would be okay.Furioso said:No way, that is pretty much wrong by fact, the only reason games these days have seemingly better graphics is by them cutting corners (such as the low field of view in CoD MW3, which limits what's on screen at any given time), which they have gotten very good at over the years, but think about it, would you trust the technology in a PC from 2003?RickyRich said:Maybe I'm just the odd man out on this issue, but I feel like so much more could be done with the current technology.
You're not the only one, sadly.Chairman Miaow said:I am amazed and horrified by the number of nos in this thread.
my thoughts exactlyzombieshark6666 said:You're not the only one, sadly.Chairman Miaow said:I am amazed and horrified by the number of nos in this thread.
It's baffling how many think it's worth paying hundreds of dollars for some visual effects, less loading times, longer development cycles, less innovation, etc.
If they're willing to push the AI and physics as much as graphics, it would be nice, but the budgets would skyrocket, so it's not likely to happen.
A new generation of consoles means higher resolution, more RAM and less games/more expensive games for not much more fun or wow factor.
Finances. I'f prefer if there was not a new console generation until I'm finished uni. That being said, I can always do what I did when the 360 launched (PS3 came out like 18 months after the 360 in Australia).TheKasp said:More processing power is always good. There is actually no reason to be opposed to a new console generation.