Black Ops is going to be awesome, especially around the multiplayer front.
That's why I'm buying it.
That's why I'm buying it.
I respect that decision because I personally thought World at War was a Catastrophe, but in general the game is going to be much more balanced. They really did their homework in terms of Balance issues, and said there main priority was to tackle in glitches and exploits that first came out in the game.JakeTheSnakeMan said:I'm not buying it. I've never really been into Call of Duty much and MW2 really left a bad taste in my mouth. The campaign was short and the multiplayer fundamentally broken. I know Black Ops is being developed by Treyarch but lets face it. They're not going to be much different.
Sooooo you completely hate the entire series just because enemies come out of invisible walls?Spy_Guy said:Will not get it.
Treyarch has with WaW proven that they're only good for releasing a horrible, broken mess of a game. Yes, WaW was cool, but they forgot rule #1 of immersion.
No invisible walls in open fucking doorways!
Well, yes, you have an enemy spawn in there... but that house surely could provide some much-needed cover from grenades nd bullets and the like.
Shoddy game design like that... no... never. WaW does clearly top my list of "stuff I deeply regret paying for".
As such, why on earth would I entrust them with more of my money?
First, I just have to point out that it's ironic you're getting rid of medal of honour while your avatar is a picture of Danger Close...second...is anybody else scratching their heads about the two men sharing the umbrella?Kukakkau said:I don't fall into any real category there - mainly to play with my friends list, rebalancing and of course zombies.
Plus I was getting rid of medal of honour so had the money back to spend