Poll: Would you accept immortality?

Recommended Videos

Dr. Crawver

Doesn't know why he has premium
Nov 20, 2009
1,099
0
0
I would say no. I couldn't live with seeing those who I cared about die as I go on.

The ensuing insanity would also wreck it for me

The tempting part of it however would be that I could potentially become some sort of oracle of humanity, or even the emperor of mankind. Then I would make 20 different types of superhumans, each led by a more powerful superhuman that would travel through the galaxy and...wait, has this been thought of before?
 

everythingbeeps

New member
Sep 30, 2011
946
0
0
the spud said:
1. Evolution will turn you into a freak: Over thousands of years something better, stronger, faster, and smarter will likely develop from humans, leaving you left behind as a freak.

2. Nobody can ever find out: If you've got immortality then everybody will want it. Governments, CEO's, the masses, you name it. And they don't care what they have to do to get it.

3. You're still getting older (mentally): You will be forced to remember everything that happens over the course of infinity, which your brain just isn't built to do.

4. Time speeds up till you're insane: As time flies by, your different friends, loves, and lives slowly fade from your memory, making 50 years seem relatively equal to a saturday night.

5. You will eventually get trapped there forever: Eventually, you will get trapped in a pile of rubble, or the rest of the human race gets wiped out, and you till be trapped there forever.
[/spoiler]
I would take it because these items are all pretty easily deflected.

1. I just don't really believe this applies. Yes, it's true that you would bear little resemblance to a human from a million years from now, but thousands? There's no reason to think that humans will evolve so much in thousands of years that you can't keep up, especially considering that most of that "evolution" is going to come from augmentations. It won't happen naturally. It'll be implants and surgeries and technical stuff. All stuff that you can take part in. And as for the whole "millions of years" thing, ideally mankind is going to splinter off and inhabit multiple worlds/systems, and their evolutionary paths will go in different directions. Either that or we'll die out completely and you'll be by your lonesome, which might get boring, but not so boring I wouldn't still take it.

Either that or we'll reach postphysical status and just all live virtually, which might make this whole exercise largely moot.

2. Shouldn't be too hard. Just keep changing your name/appearance. You'll have plenty of time to learn new languages, so travel the world for a while.

3. Technology will take care of this fairly soon. They're already working on it.

4. Meh. This is debatable. A year is still a year, and it's still going to last a year. I'm not buying this one as a serious problem. Sure, I imagine you'll hit a rough spot after a few generations and you have this crisis moment where all your original friends are dead, and that you'll outlive all your new friends and every friend you make after that. But I think it's something a person could adjust to, eventually.

The hard part here is letting yourself continue getting emotionally involved with people. And like I said, there would be a rough patch, maybe 200-300 years from "now", where you'll decide that people aren't worth caring about because they'll be gone and you won't, and you'll live in a shack in the woods for a while, but I think eventually you'll learn to deal with everyone else's miniscule lifespans, especially if you keep reinventing yourself as a person.

5. Trapped where? The death of the universe? Who knows what that even is?
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
My mind is on the fritz already and 'm only 18. Hell no. Eventually when the planet goes away from whatever happens to it in billions of years, you'd be floating in space gasping for breath.
 

Yosato

New member
Apr 5, 2010
494
0
0
Hell yes, I'd nom that gummi bear in a heartbeat. All those things I could contend with, and I reckon you wouldn't be so much a freak as unique, remember that your brain would also evolve over time - you could store knowledge of so many things and learn about twenty language until your status was elevated to something godlike.

And then there's number four. "Time speeds up till you're insane: As time flies by, your different friends, loves, and lives slowly fade from your memory, making 50 years seem relatively equal to a saturday night." I seriously doubt that would ever happen - age doesn't really make things faster; seconds tick by at the exact same speed whether you're five or fifty.

People say that things go slower because you get older but it's a load of crap, it's the not doing anything and same daily repetition that makes your hours blur by. If you keep yourself busy and mix things up then it doesn't happen, and I imagine if you were immortal you could think of plenty of things to do with your time.
 

GotMalkAvian

New member
Feb 4, 2009
380
0
0
I would only accept immortality if there was an escape clause, some way that I could still choose to end my life. There's a great Twilight Zone episode- called "Escape Clause," actually, I believe- where a man sells his soul for immortality, and the devil throws in a clause where he can choose to die whenever he wants.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Well, I don't believe in an after-life so have no reason to not want to avoid death. I also don't buy most of those reasons for not being immortal. You hear them all of the time, but I've never seen any evidence to back up some of the brain related stuff, so I'll take my chances. Plus if I live until the big crunch and a new Big Bang I can merge with the sentience of the universe and become Galactus, so I really don't see a downside to being the last guy standing.
 

OctoH

New member
Feb 14, 2011
502
0
0
I would probably take it. And then eventually find a way to create a suicide gummi once I get tired of everything.
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,149
2
3
Country
UK
While I did vote no but I wonder if I take the immortality, couldn't I put myself into a deep slumber/ eternal sleep or at least a place where I just try to sleep forever? I mean I wouldn't die from starvation and I guess this is the closest thing to suicide well no longer want to live. The only bad thing from trying to sleep forever is dealing with any nightmares.
 

michiehoward

New member
Apr 18, 2010
731
0
0
Who wants to live fooooreverrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?

Maybe if it were a "life extension" gummi bear.
My reasons succinctly listed in that summary.
 

SoranMBane

New member
May 24, 2009
1,175
0
0
Even though I'd probably regret the decision a millennium or so down the line and would much prefer the type of immortality where I simply don't age but could easily end my own life if things get too unbearable, I'd still do it. Immortality is the one thing I want more than anything else, and I'll accept any risks to my future mental stability to get it.
 

Gustavo S. Buschle

New member
Feb 23, 2011
238
0
0
I recommend watching this video at around 3 minutes in it explains how terrible it would be when you are around 9001 years old.
I answered no for living forever as I am now, but if I were to be Dr. Manhattan I might accept it.
 

michiehoward

New member
Apr 18, 2010
731
0
0
And didn't Adam from Mythbusters touch on this last week in that cool medical special, anyone notice how shitty he looked in his "final body"? LMAO
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
Don Savik said:
What kind of hipster douchebag answers no? Seriously? LIVING FOREVER. You could rule the world by default, no questions asked. Could get boring? Did imagination die in the past 5 years and I just haven't noticed it or something? Too much depression on this forum. Lighten ups.
Obviously you never read Cracked's article on why living forever wouldn't be so great. I'm also guessing you haven't seen the movie Death Becomes Her. I vote no, for the reasons those previous things mentioned.
 

pilf

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2008
143
0
21
In the words of Freddie Mercury "Who wants to live forever?". Best to just spend the time I have and get out.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43
Yes I would.

All the downsides I don't see as downsides because eventually humanity will invent time travel and/or interstellar space flight so I can go where I want, when I want, and as far as I want without having to worry about not seeing it all. Because I will eventually see everything.
 

Sandernista

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,302
0
0
archvile93 said:
Don Savik said:
What kind of hipster douchebag answers no? Seriously? LIVING FOREVER. You could rule the world by default, no questions asked. Could get boring? Did imagination die in the past 5 years and I just haven't noticed it or something? Too much depression on this forum. Lighten ups.
Obviously you never read Cracked's article on why living forever wouldn't be so great, nor have you seen the movie Death Becomes Her. I vote no.
Sorry but that cracked article is bs.

And Death Becomes Her was a horrible movie, and a completely different form of 'immortality'.