It really wouldn't be a big deal to me, if I find them physically attractive, and emotionally attractive then so what?
(This from a mostly *straight* male)
(This from a mostly *straight* male)
I think that it is a choice to trade in your penis for a vagina. It's not compulsory or anything.Melanie McGreevey said:not a choice...Angry Juju said:I'd prefer my partner to be genuine to be honest.. It's a lifestyle choice but it would just seem fake to me if I were to date someone who was transgender.
(i'm not calling the act of being transgender fake, so please don't read it as if i'm insulting you)
I'm so, so sorry. I actually agree with you, you're doing a fine job here, but IRREGARDLESS is not a word. I'm sorry! I'm really sorry.Melanie McGreevey said:Only very recently it was declassified as a mental illness. So irregardless as to what it "fits into" it's not a mental disorder anymore. BDD could be anyone who has a body life after loosing weight, or a face lift that changed their appearance. or breast augmentation, to me those are all drastic.
the whole dog thing is ridiculous, plus people do that already, and there's apparently nothing wrong with them. Haven't you seen the cat man (facial surgeries, and drastic piercings). Or the lizard man, sub-dermal implants, full body tattoo, and split tongue?
there's a VERY specific set of diagnostics for trans people, and they in fact do NOT fall into the category of BDD.
I honestly doubt that. I recognise that the emotional side of this is not a choice, and I'm not trying to argue otherwise, but the OP is talking about somebody who actually had the operation from M-F or vice versa. That is a choice.Melanie McGreevey said:it's like the choice to breath or not.hazabaza1 said:I think that it is a choice to trade in your penis for a vagina. It's not compulsory or anything.Melanie McGreevey said:not a choice...Angry Juju said:I'd prefer my partner to be genuine to be honest.. It's a lifestyle choice but it would just seem fake to me if I were to date someone who was transgender.
(i'm not calling the act of being transgender fake, so please don't read it as if i'm insulting you)
OT: No, I doubt I would. Bit weird for my tastes.
Fair enough. It just seemed like a rather obvious assumption to me but I guess this is more something you need to experience to understand.Melanie McGreevey said:the thing i don't think you understand is the "choice" to have the GRS is one-like breathing (you may want the surgery, but affording it is another issue, and 2- I don't know a single (although i bet they are out there) trans person who given the opportunity to have the surgery wouldn't jump at it. Most trans people don't begin transition only to get 75% of the way there. Really, they may "choose" not to have GRS because they are older, and only want to live life as complete as possible, or can't afford it.hazabaza1 said:I honestly doubt that. I recognise that the emotional side of this is not a choice, and I'm not trying to argue otherwise, but the OP is talking about somebody who actually had the operation from M-F or vice versa. That is a choice.Melanie McGreevey said:it's like the choice to breath or not.hazabaza1 said:I think that it is a choice to trade in your penis for a vagina. It's not compulsory or anything.Melanie McGreevey said:not a choice...Angry Juju said:I'd prefer my partner to be genuine to be honest.. It's a lifestyle choice but it would just seem fake to me if I were to date someone who was transgender.
(i'm not calling the act of being transgender fake, so please don't read it as if i'm insulting you)
OT: No, I doubt I would. Bit weird for my tastes.
It's realy not easy to explain, but i have never met a trans person who chooses to go through everything they have to go through only to stop short.
I actually knew a couple exactly like that too.aegix drakan said:FYI, though, I know a FTM trans person who's actually pretty damn cool...And they have a fiance (male), that was dating them LONG before they came out as trans. They're still together and doing fantastic. I applaud them for being able to stick together despite the change.
Yes, but if that duck is completely fabulous and into interior design and designer labels, I don't think that duck and I would be right for each other.JoJoDeathunter said:Assuming their parts downstairs are fully functional, I don't see any reason why not. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it's probably a duck. Lack of reproductive ability might be a longer-term issue but I would be okay with adopting if there was no other choice.