Poll: Would you use Genetic Manipulation as a Body Modification?

Recommended Videos

ReinWeisserRitter

New member
Nov 15, 2011
749
0
0
For something practical (such as correcting a defect), sure. For doing any number of the, in my frank opinion, empty-headed things you've listed, hell no.

But then, I'm what one might describe as "down to earth".
 

DarkRyter

New member
Dec 15, 2008
3,076
0
0
I'd go for the sharingan and maybe a fang or two, but I'm pretty sure being a death note cosplayer isn't a genetic thing.
 

CulixCupric

New member
Oct 20, 2011
847
0
0
DarkRyter said:
I'd go for the sharingan and maybe a fang or two, but I'm pretty sure being a death note cosplayer isn't a genetic thing.
with the deathnote one, i meant changing hair color.
 

Shakomaru

New member
May 18, 2011
834
0
0
This instantly made me think of Bioshock. Hmm... Well, I'll take Aquamarine eyes. Sounds like enough for me.
 

CulixCupric

New member
Oct 20, 2011
847
0
0
Shakomaru said:
This instantly made me think of Bioshock. Hmm... Well, I'll take Aquamarine eyes. Sounds like enough for me.
someone already used the term splicing.

usmarine4160 said:
Now tweaking genetics to fight inherited conditions is possible and yes, I totally support that but you're talking "Splice" here
see? but we're not talking plasmids, cause there are no bees involved. I made this topic because i saw an article on advancements in genetic modification. anyone heard of the "spider goats"? well, this wasn't this article, it was on human-animal splicing/genetic manipulation.

it was this article: http://singularityhub.com/2011/07/26/uk-plans-for-human-animal-genetic-hybrids/
 

Substitute Troll

New member
Aug 29, 2010
374
0
0
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Wait. Wait... Wait. WAIT. WAIT! Wait, wait, wait... Wait.

I can haz Witcher eyes?

Sign me the fuck up.
 

drisky

New member
Mar 16, 2009
1,605
0
0
I'm not against body modification if people want it. I'm not against genetic modification for medical purposes. Beyond that we run it to problems though. If we enhance performance then it will just be for those who can afford it and now the rich are just better form birth and the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Also as mentioned by someone already, you'd be passing on these tampered with traits, which could cause any number of unknown problems a few generations down. There are inherent dangers to gene therapy and we have to be careful with how we use it.

Also most of the stuff you shown can already be done anyways. Contacts for the eyes, plastic surgery for the ears, surgical hair implants for the werewolf, and so on.
 

Sum1else

New member
Feb 16, 2011
11
0
0
1. depending on when and how your genes are modified, it may not transfer, it only will if the gametes are directly affected, which is unlikely to be done because that won't cause any physical changes (unless the intent is to fix/cause sterility).

2. we already are, what chemicals we take in determine which genes we express, (they took identical twin rats and by feeding them slightly different but still fully nutritious diets got them to look and act completely different) and by taking in specific chemicals from birth you can do things like raise IQ or specify certain characteristics within standard human ranges.

3. what this will allow (aside from cosmetic effect) is specialization, if you want to get a specific job from a young enough age you could spend several years getting modified to have 'talents' used in that kind of job (more than can be acquired naturally), (or your parents could buy you some 'talent' at birth and let you pursue it or not).
 

idarkphoenixi

New member
May 2, 2011
1,492
0
0
If its purely just for appearance then no, I'd rather not stand out like that. I'd want it to at least have some kind of practical use first.
 

William Ossiss

New member
Apr 8, 2010
551
0
0
Green/black scales and accentuated eyes? (mine happen to be multi-colored...) with reptile-ish pupils?

Fuck Yes.

I want a tail!
 

Loop Stricken

Covered in bees!
Jun 17, 2009
4,722
0
0
I absolutely would, for both cosmetic and health reasons.

I've got poor eyesight so that shit would get fixed immediately, with a colour customisation to boot! Not sure whether I'd go with red or yellow, though I'm leaning towards the latter. Hell, since it's all theoretical anyway, I'll even include a mental switch that can make my yellow eyes glow in the dark!
Ooh, and make the pupils those horizontal goat-eye things. That's cool.

Otherwise, obligatory anti-ageing treatments notwithstanding; stronger bones, more efficient lungs and digestive tracts, a second heart perhaps.
Basically, the parts of the Adeptus Astartes that don't turn me into a steroid-overdosed walking tank, but DO make me awesome.
 

RQshadowe

New member
May 22, 2010
18
0
0
I think, i would have genetic modification on the one condition that the old genes could be saved, and then my progeny could have those genes remapped onto the ones i had changed, if they so wished.

And all causes of beauty and most of necessity are objective.
 

Snow Fire

Fluffy Neko Kemono
Jan 19, 2009
180
0
21
Cat ears, cat tail, different eye color and hair color, and body hair below my head going away forever, this is all I need. :>
 

Denamic

New member
Aug 19, 2009
3,803
0
0
Absofuckinglutely.
So what if it makes me 'inhuman'.
What is the big deal about being human anyway?
 

CulixCupric

New member
Oct 20, 2011
847
0
0
idarkphoenixi said:
If its purely just for appearance then no, I'd rather not stand out like that. I'd want it to at least have some kind of practical use first.
practical uses:
ears would increase hearing, eyes would have low-light vision, fangs would help eating, fur would keep you warm, you could increase your metabolism, strengthen your bones, tendons, joints, muscles, etc. why not add webbed hands and gills and become an Olympic swimmer? although that might be cheating. can anyone else think of any cosmetics that have practical uses?
 

Eventidal

New member
Nov 11, 2009
283
0
0
@OP: That's a pretty crazy list of nothing. Hair and eye color changes, elf ears, I get it. You posted like 10 completely unnecessary extra examples of the same kinds of manipulation. Red eyes are up there like 5 times. Elves 4. One is more than enough. >_>

But yeah, I'd do it. If possible I'd change myself so much I'm not even human anymore. It's hard to explain why, but if I had the means to do so... sure. Really, I'd make the change because I see my fursona as the greater version of myself, sort of like who I am inside. If I could become that in reality, I would. Unlike many others, I don't see the big point in trying to be natural and not changing anything about ourselves, retaining our humanity. In my eyes, the physical part of humanity isn't what makes us special or in any way a good thing. I kind of like the idea of having a more diverse set of intelligent species on our planet. If some people choose to change themselves so much that they're no longer human... well, it certainly obscures how we look at species and the animal kingdom and life in general, but it could very well broaden our horizons quite a bit.
Imagine if mermaids were a real thing, made possible through genetic engineering. They could really contribute a lot to society and the arts, as living underwater is a concept almost entirely unimaginable to us. We stay on land a lot more than underwater, so they could be pretty useful in helping solve the many mysteries of the deep.
There's a lot of potential bad (if someone decides to get Spiderman web powers with genetic engineering, how do we deal with people suddenly being able to climb the sides of structures and swinging around? What about a guy who goes werewolf? Are claws considered concealed weapons?) but there's good in there.

Well, yeah, that could get pretty bad. Maybe we'd have to have laws against changing people's brains, so there are no crazy werewolf attacks. I still feel like we're going to get to this point in our lifetimes where such things are possible, and even if the law doesn't allow them, who's to say they won't happen anyway? Certainly it's harder to research and extract and change DNA sequences, synthesize the molecules and create viruses that will change a person's DNA to the new version against the watchful eye of the law, but somewhere, somehow, if the technology exists, it will happen. And we'll have to find a way to deal with it.

Really heavy stuff, actually. I think transhumanism is going to end up being a really big topic of debate over the next few decades. (not to say it isn't already)