But we already are time traveling at the rate of one second per second!Womplord said:How about time travel? It would make things interesting. We could get technology from the future and they could get technology from a further future. As long as the universe doesn't collapse from all the paradoxes.
I know it'd be nice to jump all over FTL, but at what cost and in what way?Shock and Awe said:FTL in a heartbeat. For me thats the current holy grail of science. Partially because we will need it one way or another in the future and partially because I want it NOW. It'd be cool to go to mars and come back in a few hours.
Douglas Adams has you covered [http://www.earthstar.co.uk/rest.htm].Vegosiux said:On a more serious note, I'd rather not mess with that, once you break causality, you're screwed, not to mention all the new grammar rules we'll have to adopt.
Replicator tech is on the list, it's essentially the same thing as teleportation, the big problem is it'll need a lot of energy, so without the "future energy tech" it would be pretty much useless... Still gets my vote though.Hazy992 said:Pretty much yeah. No more fighting over resources for one thing.Swyftstar said:Ninja'd.Hazy992 said:INB4 everybody says Replicator and Holodeck.
Seriously, with just one of those two you'd be set.
Seriously, wouldn't replicator tech basically solve most of the worlds problems right now?
Ninja'd just a few posts in. Although I'd take the replicator over the holodeck.Hazy992 said:INB4 everybody says Replicator and Holodeck.
Seriously, with just one of those two you'd be set.