Geese are also monogamous.Glademaster said:First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are. If people don't want to practise monogamy that is up to them but it is a bit of a piss poor excuse saying it goes against human instincts given that loads have done it successfully for years.
I have goats. Monogamous they are not.Glademaster said:First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are.
Why One man and one woman?Lady Nilstria said:I have goats. Monogamous they are not.Glademaster said:First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are.
Monogamy is what God ordained to be. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'll just go ahead and just use marriage as an example, because it'll be easier to explain. One man and one woman. That is "traditional" for a reason. The loving and trusting bond created between a single man and a single woman is the perfect environment to excell, for a marriage should bring out the best of both, (I'm not saying all do, but they should!), and to raise a family. People are more then animals. Our bodies may be pretty darn similar to monkeys and pigs, but that is not all we are. Contrary to popular belief, we are perfectly capable of overcoming our bodies. If not, we'd all be having raging orgies every month.
In fact, someone saying a person can't control himself or herself is an insult to all humanity.
Lastly, no, I would not practice pologamy, even if it was legal.
Yes. It was easy. I had no problem with it whatsoever.TheLiham said:Ever had to share a girl you love?
Didn't think so.
Again, sir. Do you know if it's true for the 100% of those--even males--that have yet to be, those that are, and those that were? What makes you think everyone is concerned about the survival of the species--let alone its progress? It's a disturbing trend that I've seen amongst humans: the trend to state their observations as the "truth."dathwampeer said:It's human nature to be at the very least curious about having sex with other people. Even if someone doesn't cheat, there is a 100% chance that at some point during any relationship they've had. That they have looked at another prospective mate in sexual way. whether or not they act upon it is another matter.Giest4life said:Monogamy is the last vestiges of a dying human race--the race of the "last men," as Nietzsche called them. There is nothing good, noble, and praiseworthy about monogamy. Just as there is nothing special with polygamy.
Be careful with that, sir. When you say "we" how sure are you that you speak for 100% of the human populace, the dead, the living, and those that are not yet conceived? I'd be careful with generalizations like that....dathwampeer said:If we were meant to be monogamous we wouldn't have any desire to cheat.
Simple as.
Penguins don't cheat, in-fact most of the time when one's partner dies. It will simply never mate again. Some die soon after, thoughts are from grief. Wanna know why? Because they were born to be monogamous.
What I am sure of is that monogamy, especially as far as males are concerned, is counter intuitive as far as survival of the species goes. Atleast in a primitive situation. Spreading your genes to as many mates as possible gives you a greater chance of special survival.
That's not so important now. But old habits are hard to kick. Especially ones that are ingrained on you at a genetic level.
I generalise because it's true.