Poll: Your stance on monogamy?

Recommended Videos

mike1921

New member
Oct 17, 2008
1,292
0
0
Other, do whatever you want as long as everyone who needs to know does know what you're doing.
 

4173

New member
Oct 30, 2010
1,019
0
0
I guess I go with other.

It's right for the people it's right for, and wrong for the people it's not.
 

bubba145

New member
Jan 4, 2010
448
0
0
Part one it just feels right and one person is so much easier to understand then two.
Part two i would probably only have two wives easier.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,635
0
0
I don't really feel one way or another towards monogamy or polygamy. If someone wants to follow either I have no problem with it so far as its consensual. I mean polygamy can sound nice, but I can see how it can cause a lot o problems between the numerous spouses (be them male or female). So I say do whatever you want to. I would be willing for either.
 

3AM

New member
Oct 21, 2010
227
0
0
Glademaster said:
First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are. If people don't want to practise monogamy that is up to them but it is a bit of a piss poor excuse saying it goes against human instincts given that loads have done it successfully for years.
Geese are also monogamous.

I don't think polygamy is morally wrong, but I've yet to see it done successfully, where all involved are truly happy.

I'm too lazy for polygamy.
 

sumanoskae

New member
Dec 7, 2007
1,526
0
0
I'm indifferent. People should do what they feel will make them happy(Which they do anyways, virtually no exceptions), who am I or anyone else to tell someone what's right or wrong to do with what's theirs?.

Personally, If i was in a romantic relationship I would feel compelled by the programing of society to practice monogamy. But if the relationship was just about sex, I'd rather just keep at that and do whatever the hell I want.

I'm really not the best person to answer this question, I have no objective opinions about what's right or wrong anyways. I have feelings on the subject(See above), but no conceptions of them being anything more then just personal compulsions. How could I logically argue right from wrong anyway?(See: Existential Nihilism)
 

Father of Worlds

New member
Mar 25, 2010
24
0
0
When everyone involved is aware of what's happening, accepts what's happening, and isn't emotionally injured by the fact that it's happening, then whatever.

When that's not the case, very much not whatever.

My wife and I have already had a talk about this - if we meet someone who we both feel we could have a relationship with, and that third person was also up for it, we'd go for it. But that's pretty much the extent of either of us having someone beyond each other.

Really, it depends on who's involved. There's no "Monogamy is right" any more than there is a "Monogamy is wrong" - it's case-by-case. A polyamorous relationship can work, if everyone in it behaves. So can monogamous relationships. And both can also fail, sometimes spectacularly, for any number of reasons.
 

Lady Nilstria

New member
Aug 11, 2009
161
0
0
Glademaster said:
First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are.
I have goats. Monogamous they are not.

Monogamy is what God ordained to be. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'll just go ahead and just use marriage as an example, because it'll be easier to explain. One man and one woman. That is "traditional" for a reason. The loving and trusting bond created between a single man and a single woman is the perfect environment to excell, for a marriage should bring out the best of both, (I'm not saying all do, but they should!), and to raise a family. People are more then animals. Our bodies may be pretty darn similar to monkeys and pigs, but that is not all we are. Contrary to popular belief, we are perfectly capable of overcoming our bodies. If not, we'd all be having raging orgies every month.

In fact, someone saying a person can't control himself or herself is an insult to all humanity.

Lastly, no, I would not practice pologamy, even if it was legal.
 

Tipsy Giant

New member
May 10, 2010
1,133
0
0
I personally choose Monogamy as I enjoy it and feel a deep bond with a partner knowing that we care for each other and only each other, but I don't judge those who disagree.

Whatever makes you happy (as long as it is consensual)

^ the words I live by
 

Tipsy Giant

New member
May 10, 2010
1,133
0
0
Lady Nilstria said:
Glademaster said:
First off swans and goats are monogamous as far as I remember I know swans definitely are.
I have goats. Monogamous they are not.

Monogamy is what God ordained to be. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'll just go ahead and just use marriage as an example, because it'll be easier to explain. One man and one woman. That is "traditional" for a reason. The loving and trusting bond created between a single man and a single woman is the perfect environment to excell, for a marriage should bring out the best of both, (I'm not saying all do, but they should!), and to raise a family. People are more then animals. Our bodies may be pretty darn similar to monkeys and pigs, but that is not all we are. Contrary to popular belief, we are perfectly capable of overcoming our bodies. If not, we'd all be having raging orgies every month.

In fact, someone saying a person can't control himself or herself is an insult to all humanity.

Lastly, no, I would not practice pologamy, even if it was legal.
Why One man and one woman?
 

Serenegoose

Faerie girl in hiding
Mar 17, 2009
2,014
0
0
I'm non-monogamous. I think it's a false dichotomy, this either/or decision of monogamy or polyamory. I think everyone has a comfortable amount of people they would like to share their life with and be in love with - for some people that might be zero and they just want friends and fuck buddies, which is fine. For some people that's 1 - they just want one person to have as their partner and to love and that's fine too. For some the number is higher. Two or three or more, and that's fine too, as long as everybody involved is cool with it, because as adults, we have this amazing ability to look at things and make our own decisions about what's good or bad for us. I don't see how having none, one, two, or more partners could be intrinsically wrong - to me that's as sensible as saying the letter Y is inherently immoral.
 

Koroviev

New member
Oct 3, 2010
1,599
0
0
I couldn't care less if multiple people want to be involved in a relationship, but I don't see it working from a legal standpoint. If they were all to get married, who would get to make end-of-life decisions? Do they form a council? How does taxation work? I'm no expert, but I think it would be more trouble than it's worth. As a matter of fact, marriage in general seems like more trouble than it's worth. As it stands, you're probably just going to get divorced anyway.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
I think monogamy is great and all, but I also feel it's tempting to want to be a polygamist. It's definitely a base instinct, but I think it's also an imporant part of being human that we resist base insticts for logical and practical and emotional reasons... basically, we have a higher instict.
 

tautologico

e^(i * pi) + 1 = 0
Apr 5, 2010
725
0
0
Monogamy is simpler for society as a whole; inheritance rights, family relationships, a lot of very pragmatic stuff is simpler when everyone has only one (at leas one "official") partner.

Things are quite more complex than thinking monogamy "feels right" because you were taught this way. No matter how much you love someone, you will eventually feel attracted to other people. I do think it's quite possible to deal with this and continue to be monogamous, but simply trying to deny and repress the urges won't do much good.

Yes, many times the "we're not biologically made to be monogamous" may be just a lame excuse for people who want to cheat. But I don't think monogamy is right because it's right either. It's more complex than that (even though I am monogamous myself).

And as many people before have said, if it is consensual polygamy and no one is being hurt, I don't see why anyone would have problems with this.
 

lettucethesallad

New member
Nov 18, 2009
803
0
0
I think polygamy is fine if others want to do it, whatever floats your boat. But I'm a one-man kind of girl and would probably not date anyone who was intending on hooking up with other girls, at least not if the relationship was serious.
 

Cavouku

New member
Mar 14, 2008
1,122
0
0
Polygamy to me just feels animal in mindset, and that's exactly why I don't like it. I don't look at myself and think I'm a homo sapiens sapiens, I think I'm a person. But that's not my reason for monogamy, just my reason against polygamy. Not everyone feels the way I do, but it's hard for me to get along with polygamist-minded people, they just seem hedonistic and aloof.

I believe in love is all. I doubt I need to justify that if someone's felt it.

Oh, I guess that answers the "if polygamy was legal/accepted" thing. I just... couldn't go up to two girls and tell them I have a crush on both of them.
 

PayneTrayne

Filled with ReLRRgious fervor.
Dec 17, 2009
892
0
0
I personally find it odd to leave one person sexually frustrated, let alone several. Me being polygamous would be a plague upon the world, the likes of which have never been seen.

But for you guys, hey man, whatever floats your boat. Just please don't pick up my girl.
 

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
dathwampeer said:
Giest4life said:
Monogamy is the last vestiges of a dying human race--the race of the "last men," as Nietzsche called them. There is nothing good, noble, and praiseworthy about monogamy. Just as there is nothing special with polygamy.

dathwampeer said:
If we were meant to be monogamous we wouldn't have any desire to cheat.

Simple as.

Penguins don't cheat, in-fact most of the time when one's partner dies. It will simply never mate again. Some die soon after, thoughts are from grief. Wanna know why? Because they were born to be monogamous.
Be careful with that, sir. When you say "we" how sure are you that you speak for 100% of the human populace, the dead, the living, and those that are not yet conceived? I'd be careful with generalizations like that....
It's human nature to be at the very least curious about having sex with other people. Even if someone doesn't cheat, there is a 100% chance that at some point during any relationship they've had. That they have looked at another prospective mate in sexual way. whether or not they act upon it is another matter.

What I am sure of is that monogamy, especially as far as males are concerned, is counter intuitive as far as survival of the species goes. Atleast in a primitive situation. Spreading your genes to as many mates as possible gives you a greater chance of special survival.

That's not so important now. But old habits are hard to kick. Especially ones that are ingrained on you at a genetic level.

I generalise because it's true.
Again, sir. Do you know if it's true for the 100% of those--even males--that have yet to be, those that are, and those that were? What makes you think everyone is concerned about the survival of the species--let alone its progress? It's a disturbing trend that I've seen amongst humans: the trend to state their observations as the "truth."