Pony Science

Recommended Videos

CrimsonRegret

New member
Aug 27, 2009
126
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
1. Ponies move the clouds, ecosystem doesn't work.
2. Animals don't seem to hunt each other, no evolution.
3. Machinery with no electricity, and no one seems to industrialize.
4. Science with magic? Its one or the other, but not both.
5. Pinkie sense is suddenly scrutinized by science from twilight, but everything else wrong with MLP isn't? Oh yeah we totally know ponies can fly and perform magic. That's science right there.
6. a non genetic birth mark appears when they realize who they are? ridiculous.
7. the problems of pony physics.

In MLP, science no longer applies.
I forgot who said this, but basically, in another universe it's not that it functions outside the laws of physics, it's physics are just different then our own. (Not an exact quote, i kind of butchered it.)
 

Nerdstar

New member
Apr 29, 2011
316
0
0
Melon Hunter said:
Nerdstar said:
great chart! although i must question why pinkie pie has recaceive unicorn genes? Faust herself has stated as much that pinkie is part pegesi as shown in her original sketch, and iv seen no evidence to suggest unicorn decent (here quantum reality warping powers fall out of the bounds of currently explainable equestrian science much like derpy hooves)
Yeah...that might be my fault. I suggested that Pinkie has recessive unicorn genes to explain her 'teleportation' abilities.
that's quite alright, that's what good science is all about,stating a hypothesis and adding and revising as we go,and on that note i too am looking forward to said revised chart

Quaxar said:
Well, that clears that up. But then again it provokes new questions like who's the link between the Alicorn sisters and the ordinary prince.
Also, line of succession. As nephew 26 times removed he is clearly not a real member of the royal bloodline anymore, not to mention if the Princess is actually immortal like it is suggested there is no need for an heir anyway. At best he could be a <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince#Non-dynastic_princes>non-dynastic prince but I guess that's rather a topic for another thread.
don't quote me on the number all i know is that price blueblood is removed enough times to that he has no DIRECT decent from either Luna or Celestia, and your Non-dynastic prince theory is a viable one but other than faust's word that he related somehow we don't know if there's enough royal blood for him to be a "blood prince" (ohh think of the shame prince BLUEBLOOD isn't a genuine price at all, how scandalise)
 

^=ash=^

New member
Sep 23, 2009
588
0
0
Interesting work I must say.

My only issue is that you have the same genes (pegasus & unicorn) as both recessive and dominant to each other which doesn't really work.

Otherwise very good work.

xxx
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,947
0
0
Nerdstar said:
Quaxar said:
Well, that clears that up. But then again it provokes new questions like who's the link between the Alicorn sisters and the ordinary prince.
Also, line of succession. As nephew 26 times removed he is clearly not a real member of the royal bloodline anymore, not to mention if the Princess is actually immortal like it is suggested there is no need for an heir anyway. At best he could be a <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince#Non-dynastic_princes>non-dynastic prince but I guess that's rather a topic for another thread.
don't quote me on the number all i know is that price blueblood is removed enough times to that he has no DIRECT decent from either Luna or Celestia, and your Non-dynastic prince theory is a viable one but other than faust's word that he related somehow we don't know if there's enough royal blood for him to be a "blood prince" (ohh think of the shame prince BLUEBLOOD isn't a genuine price at all, how scandalise)
You make me want to start my own science thread. "Royal relations in Equestria" or something.
I'd add heraldry there too but unfortunately I have never seen any kind of coat of arm or flag in the show. A shame, really, because I find heraldry actually quite interesting.
 

rancher of monsters

New member
Oct 31, 2010
873
0
0
Alicorns are cosmic deities who control heavenly bodies, they might be above genetics. Otherwise, great work, earth pony genes would explain Derpy's flight problems.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,221
0
0
o.0
I've nothing really to add, since even trying to start wrapping my head around this would probably result in a bottle of Tylenol getting killed just to keep the head ache to a dull roar.

but i am rather impressed, though while 'alicorns are divine, thus above genetics' works for Luna and Celestia, what about them as an odd mutation, it happens some times right? sides :p it would let me explain the pony i made up XD

(EI:: they are pretty much no more magical then the average Unicorn, just with the added traits of the Pegasus side)
 

DocMcCray

New member
Oct 14, 2010
179
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
4. Science with magic? Its one or the other, but not both.

In MLP, science no longer applies.
Somebody hasn't seen the new Thor movie yet...

When Thor was talking to Natalie Portman's character about his world, he came up with an explanation.

This may not be exact, but it should be close.

"In the ancient times, they called it magic. In your time, they call it science. In our world, it is a mixture of both."

It's not that magic and science can't coexist. We just haven't found the link yet.
 

AdamRBi

New member
Feb 7, 2010
528
0
0
Wait... wait...

I love this breakdown, but (I'm about to post an irrelevant notation about your chart) wouldn't Pinkie Pie be Earth Dominant and Pegasus Recessive seeing how she was originally designed as a Pegasus Pony during the Character Development of the show?

Anyway, I love this chart, but as someone else commented I'm sure Alicorn's are rare breeds conceived from royal seed. Simply mixing a Pure Unicorn and a Pure Pegasus I gather wouldn't produce a practical deity.

The royal structure of Equestria surly works in where the royal gene that allows for Alicorns is a genetic mutation that forms in Unicorn/Pegasus hybrids. It's recessive, so that's why it's rare to find any even in the royal family. I'm not aware of the breeding rates of Equines, but seeing as Celestia and Luna are sisters it probably means anywhere between a 1-in-3 or 1-in-5 ratio of Alicorn births in the royal family.

Unless a royal breeds with a earth pony, in which case it'd come out a Powerful Pegasus or a Powerful Unicorn seeing as only one half of the Alicorn is present.

Or, you know what? Spores and Magic Moonlight reflected from tears, or in this case probably Rainbows of Light (As opposed to the Rainbow of Darkness, which just kinda shape-shifts things. Ooo, maybe that's what possessed Little Luna and transformed the jealousy in the young one's heart into the wicked Nightmare Moon... what is a Rainbow of Darkness anyway?).
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,804
0
0
^=ash=^ said:
Interesting work I must say.

My only issue is that you have the same genes (pegasus & unicorn) as both recessive and dominant to each other which doesn't really work.

Otherwise very good work.

xxx
That's when there's an equal part of both, and we had the male dominance decide.

Melon Hunter said:
GeorgW said:
But that would make the dominations too loosely defined and make them more case specific, which isn't really scientific. I realise there are some holes, which is why we're working on a pedigree chart where all three are equally dominant and you have 3 alleles in stead of 2. Wait for it.
Fair enough. Sorry to be so picky, I'm kinda throwing out anything I can think of to support Fluttershy being Pegasus/Earth Pony! I'm looking forward to the revised chart.

Nerdstar said:
great chart! although i must question why pinkie pie has recaceive unicorn genes? Faust herself has stated as much that pinkie is part pegesi as shown in her original sketch, and iv seen no evidence to suggest unicorn decent (here quantum reality warping powers fall out of the bounds of currently explainable equestrian science much like derpy hooves)
Yeah...that might be my fault. I suggested that Pinkie has recessive unicorn genes to explain her 'teleportation' abilities.
Nerdstar said:
Melon Hunter said:
Nerdstar said:
great chart! although i must question why pinkie pie has recaceive unicorn genes? Faust herself has stated as much that pinkie is part pegesi as shown in her original sketch, and iv seen no evidence to suggest unicorn decent (here quantum reality warping powers fall out of the bounds of currently explainable equestrian science much like derpy hooves)
Yeah...that might be my fault. I suggested that Pinkie has recessive unicorn genes to explain her 'teleportation' abilities.
that's quite alright, that's what good science is all about,stating a hypothesis and adding and revising as we go,and on that note i too am looking forward to said revised chart

Quaxar said:
Well, that clears that up. But then again it provokes new questions like who's the link between the Alicorn sisters and the ordinary prince.
Also, line of succession. As nephew 26 times removed he is clearly not a real member of the royal bloodline anymore, not to mention if the Princess is actually immortal like it is suggested there is no need for an heir anyway. At best he could be a <url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince#Non-dynastic_princes>non-dynastic prince but I guess that's rather a topic for another thread.
don't quote me on the number all i know is that price blueblood is removed enough times to that he has no DIRECT decent from either Luna or Celestia, and your Non-dynastic prince theory is a viable one but other than faust's word that he related somehow we don't know if there's enough royal blood for him to be a "blood prince" (ohh think of the shame prince BLUEBLOOD isn't a genuine price at all, how scandalise)
We're gonna change Pinkie back to Ep as she originally was.
And Prince Blueblood was supposed to be a duke, so that might help?
We're having some trouble with the new, more complex, chart. First, E3 is proving a lot more exciting, secondly the hybrids are way too common, and thirdly we just like the original more. We'll see how it goes.
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
*sigh* This can only end badly...
WARNING: Some strong language and Bad MS paint bloodspray! *heeheehee, i 've always wanted to say that!*
When will it end!?
 

Liggliluff

New member
Feb 28, 2009
5
0
0
60 comments later, I'm back!
I've read trough your fantastic comments that would help develop the chart even more.
Well currenty, I have slept and now in school (well, I'm in GMT+2), will read trough your comments even more when I get home.

Also, if you think Pinkie Pie has recessive Pegasus-gene (Ep), I can change back, which was what I had at first.
Seeing Celestia and Luna as mutations and have strong powers.

I'll talk whith GeorgW abouth this and a new table may be featured 16:00-18:00 (GMT+2).
But now: Work...

EDIT: Continue posting! Will happily to read more
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,408
0
0
Oh my god the pony lore has begun to get even more serious than the warhammer lore.

what the hell?
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Aidinthel said:
As long as we're overanalyzing FiM I may as well link this:
http://www.overthinkingit.com/2011/02/24/my-little-pony-political-economy/
I love this type of analysis. That article makes me want to write a fanfic about a Ponyville French Revolution. Applejack decapitates Celestia. And then the cows rise up and form their own nation state.

And while the hypothesis about Alicorns presented by the OP seems plausible, I'm not sure observation bears it out. Luna and Celestia are the only examples of their kind, for one thing, and they are markedly different from the other species. Most notably, they're either immortal or live incredibly long lives. They're bigger and more slender than other ponies as well, not to mention the insane level of magical prowess they posses. They're something else entirely.

I think the most rational thing to conclude, given the universe, is that the reproductive process in Equestria is entirely alien from the processes we observe in real life. After all, several natural processes, most notably weather, that are ostensibly similar to real phenomena are controlled by pony ingenuity and magic. After all, ponies don't apparently have genitalia, though it may be assumed that Faust is just being polite not drawing it. We've already seen how emotional connectivity and social cohesion can be a catalyst for magic well beyond the scope of any individual. Perhaps the power of love in this universe is directly responsible for reproduction, as opposed to our world, where it is merely related, if that.

Of course, this makes the explanation for the pervasiveness of dual genders throughout Equestrian fauna a little more complicated at best, and might have some homophobic implications at worst.

God this is embarrassingly fun to consider.
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
right, because lifting an entire orchard of apples using a magical horn is scientifically possible despite every experiment of telekenisis done saying otherwise.
Different universe, different physical laws. Science is a method, not the collective knowledge we've gained over the years. As long as the fictional universe follows a consistent enough internal logic, science still applies. And that's a good thing since Twilight (my favorite character) is a scientist.
 

Liggliluff

New member
Feb 28, 2009
5
0
0
Aww... too bad, I'm currently at a friend and will not get to my computer until tomorrow. Sorry to all...
 

DocMcCray

New member
Oct 14, 2010
179
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
DocMcCray said:
Ultratwinkie said:
4. Science with magic? Its one or the other, but not both.

In MLP, science no longer applies.
Somebody hasn't seen the new Thor movie yet...

When Thor was talking to Natalie Portman's character about his world, he came up with an explanation.

This may not be exact, but it should be close.

"In the ancient times, they called it magic. In your time, they call it science. In our world, it is a mixture of both."

It's not that magic and science can't coexist. We just haven't found the link yet.
right, because lifting an entire orchard of apples using a magical horn is scientifically possible despite every experiment of telekenisis done saying otherwise.
Less than 5 years ago, they weren't even sure anti-matter even existed. Recently they not only proved it, they were able to hold onto it for a short period of time.

Just because they haven't had a successful experiment doesn't mean they never will.
 

Zolem

New member
Jul 28, 2008
77
0
0
*sigh* OK then, let me give you the purpose of science in rather layman's terms. "Science is the belief that I live in a universe that follows a set of logical rules and that if I study and experiment enough I can understand those rules and apply them. There is no penalty for being wrong in science. Science is the constant search for the truth."

As to the 'physically impossible' argument, I'll just say this. "Welcome to another universe. Your laws of physics don't apply here. Please check the brochure to see how our laws are different than yours, and have a nice day." Or if you want a different quote, "That light there is our own universe. And that one is the next universe over. I don't like it at all, the physics are so counter intuitive." You are suffering from the Equivalence Fallacy, the belief that two similar things must be equal.

As to the 'no magic and science' argument, let me put it this way. The SUN rising used to be considered magic. Many things we have thought were supernatural have proven to be natural. Twilight herself rejects the idea of the supernatural, meaning that this universes magic follows a logical pattern. It can be studied and learned via specific formulas. Magic in the MLP setting could best be described as the manipulation of energy via inborn abilities to cause a desired effect. It is knowledge that can be studied and utilized. Much as chemistry used to be thought of as the supernatural 'alchemy', so to could the spellcasting of Equestria be an improperly explained science.
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
This also brings another flaw, lack of evolution and ecosystem. Clouds? Needing to be manipulated to make weather? That would mean the fauna and the ecosystem itself would die without rainfall. Animals needing to be woken up from hibernation? That means the animals starve to death which would make evolution impossible not to mention the lack of food chain. If nothing is automated, then no life would spring up. Having a skeptical mind when there are more holes in her universe than swiss cheese? Right, that's totally reasonable.
There doesn't need to be any evolution if the universe was created as is. The creation of the pony universe could have been instantaneous and complete, a la Genesis chapter 1. Besides, even if it did exist, coevolution could explain other animals needing ponies. At one time they may have been independent, but they eventually developed a cooperative relationship with the ponies. AS their traits which favored independence became obsolete, they drifted out.

Ultratwinkie said:
Twilight has machinery that uses electricity
I'm assuming that you're talking about the episode where Twilight tries to explain Pinkie's twitches and she straps her in to a bunch of machines with blinking lights. This is simply a set up played for laughs [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PlayedForLaughs] and no such technology shows up anywhere else. There are some other instances of ostensibly electrical devices, such as lights and fans and electric guitar music, but it's entirely plausible that they've mastered electricity. They just don't really need it. Perhaps it's comparatively difficult and costly for them to produce. I get what you're saying about the steam engine, but steam power doesn't have to come before electricity. Of course, that just leaves one to wonder why there was a smokestack on the front of that train. (I consider that a mistake, myself.) It's still consistent (and plausible) enough.

Ultratwinkie said:
Magic =/= science.
I reject your definition of magic on the grounds that it is too narrow. Magic has rules in this universe. It can be analyzed, reproduced, and understood. Defining the origin as supernatural is begging the question. If a phenomena is governed by coherent laws, it can be analyzed. And sufficiently analyzed magic [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SufficientlyAnalyzedMagic] is indistinguishable from what?
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
1. instant creation? If a great pony created the pony world, who created the great pony?

2. Right, because who needs electric lights, fans, machinery, and all the other things electricity made possible? Hell, the fridge alone is a worthwhile invention.

3. Your switching magic for science.
1. Different world. Different rules. There can be a prime mover in this universe if there needs to be. Hell, there could even be an infinite regress if that's what the creator felt like. If the world was created in its current state, then the lack of automation isn't a problem. As long as the ponies and other creatures were always there to perform their duties (or something else was there before them), it would work. And I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I do know that through co-evolution, species can become entirely dependent on one another. But that's neither here nor there, since it's not necessary for evolution to be a natural process in this universe anyway.

2. As ponies, they have different problems from us. They don't eat meat, so refrigeration becomes less important. And as I said earlier, they actually have most of those other things you mentioned. Anything they seem to be "missing," despite their apparent ability to create it can probably be explained by the notion that they simply have a better alternative, or never needed it in the first place. Magic handles most of that work.

3. I'm not switching magic for science. I'm saying that what they call "magic" in that universe is perfectly explicable by scientific method. That's the whole point of Twilight's apprenticeship to Celestia. You're the one who's equivocating.