Jumplion said:
BlackWidower said:
I don't remember signing a contract when I bought my laptop computer, or my Magic Bullet, or my Nintendo DS, and I doubt anyone who bought a PS3 will remember signing any contract either.
Erm, EULA [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EULA]? Terms of Service [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_Service]? You know, those things that nobody reads because they're way too long to sift through and just sign/hit "I accept these terms of conditions" or something without a second thought? Yeah,
those things.
Just wanted to clear that up.
I understand that with the PS3, you have to update your system/version if the system detects an update. Now, as far as I'm aware, the ToS doesnt have anything against the modifications of a system.
Think about it this way: I have a Launch PS3, which has a ridiculously small harddrive compared to the PS3 Slim. I want to upgrade my capacity without losing my backwards compatability, so therefore I decide to replace the hard drive with a larger one. This in itself is modding the console, and yet is perfectly legal to do. On an even larger scale, let's say that I want to put a 360 inside my computer. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.230867-Ridiculous-Gaming-PC-Stuffs-Xbox-360-Into-the-Case-as-Well] In this example, I've completely cannibalized and freaking franeknstein'd it into my computer. And yet, in your example, this would prevent me from accessing the features of the system.
Now, while there is the definite "Those are simple, this is a piracy mod" argument to be made here, there is very little difference in modifying your console in such a way that you would be infringing upon some sort of EULA or ToS that will prevent you from playing games. That's one of the big things about the games industry: if we buy something, we are somehow not owners of that property. Even though we have the system, have paid full retail value for it, and have installed it in our own home, it's still the property of someone else.
Does anyone else see the issue in this? I recognize the need for a way to curb piracy, but outright banning the modification of a console is something that I would find to be a little bit nerve wracking.