Of course, the project would be doomed in one way or another. Poor Terry can't catch a break.Furburt said:Also, Terry Gilliam would not go amiss either.
Oh, I did read the question, just clone the man.Deofuta said:Rainboq said:Peter Jackson, end of f*ckin' story.joshuaayt said:You kinda left out Peter Jackson. Him.Gotta read the question guysnotsosavagemessiah said:peter jackson? it only makes sense.
Ill go with Cameron. Spielberg has way of....changing things that I don't approve of. (Not that I don't like his films, I do.)
I would like you, sir, to bump my fist as a sign of agreement and respect for this statement. Thank you.pignoli said:Jesus Christ, whoever writes answers to these polls lamenting the lack of an option clearly already discounted in the poll text forgets the most obvious step of reading the text all the fucking time.
Darren Aronofsky, of course.
And hasty-I-won't-read-the-text-that's-in-front-of-me poll-replyer(s), think your stuff through before you post it.
BRILLIANT! We shalt get to work on it at once!Oh, I did read the question, just clone the man.
I agree, as long as he stays away from the screenplay and only directs. "The Fountian" would have been spectacular if a talented writer would have handed it off to Aronofsky.pignoli said:Jesus Christ, whoever writes answers to these polls lamenting the lack of an option clearly already discounted in the poll text forgets the most obvious step of reading the text all the fucking time.
Darren Aronofsky, of course.
And hasty-I-won't-read-the-text-that's-in-front-of-me poll-replyer(s), think your stuff through before you post it.