Shepard said:
DuX1112 said:
a VERY long response is no longer here
First, I'm going to stick with the anything can be addictive, mainly because anything can be; try to think of it as an obsession, if you will.
The second paragraph I mostly agree with. I don't fully agree with it, but I can't put into words my disagreement with it; its one of those moments when it makes sense in my head but I can't put it into words...
Obsession and addiction are not the same thing though. With an addiction, your dependent on something, like drugs. Sure they can both be unhealthy but you are never dependent on something with an obsession. Drugs are an addiction. Why? Because you hear stories about people over dosing on drugs, and their are countless rehab facilities to help break your dependency on them. Video games are, at worst, an obsession. Why? Because you hear stories about people who miss school, work, appointments etc., because they are playing games.
Yes, it is absurd. Instead of retyping my third paragraph I'll ask you reread it starting at "Drugs are an addiction." Done? Good. Now let us go through your list: Alcohol and drugs can kill you, Porn and gambling can consume all of your money in a very short period of time. Video games do not have the same negatives that those things do.
No they're not, whether you like it or not.
Now then, to sum up, I respect your
opinions on this topic, but I disagree with them.
Of course, I
respect your opinions too.
But, tell me, what is the difference between "feeling you depend on something" (psychological addiction) and "depending on something" (chemical addiction)? The final effect is the same: the addicted person does what the addiction compels him to do (via feelings, urges, needs), regardless of the initial cause of the addiction.
To simplify: drugs change the way the neural system works, and when in lack of drugs, the system sends messages to the brain, which the person interprets them as "feelings". Longing, yearning, a need to have one more dose. Now, the same case applies to porn, gambling, or videogames, with the sole difference that there are no chemicals
initially involved. BUT - the chemicals ARE being produced in the body, as a result of repeated stimuli.
Repeat the reward/pleasure cycle enough times, and what you get yourself into is a very similar situation to chemical addictions (of course, without the physical period of painful crisis after a period of abstinence): the habit of doing something over and over again, and achieving pleasurable results, can grow to an emotional bonding, a Pavlov-like reflex that compels you to play "one more round" (I need that one more turn!), gamble "one more time" (you never know!), or see "one more f*ck" (feels so good!).
The problem with these types of behavior isn't that playing games, watching porn or gambling is inherently wrong (it isn't) - what's wrong is the partially unconscious decision-making that a psychologically addicted person becomes subordinate to. From a thought, it becomes an unconscious
urge. And acting without thinking, depending on urges alone, isn't a good thing, I would think. The point is in self-control - and losing it. When an urge compels you to
do stuff (repeatedly), that's a good sign you've created an addictive pattern in your behavior and psyche. Which I can't see as being a healthy or a good thing.
If you still have problems believing this is true (or can be true), then either you're in denial, or you've never experienced anything like it yourself - or you've never seen a person getting addict
ive over these things.
Addiction is not obsession (although they are similar because the share certain characteristics). And even if it was, as you probably know, obsession isn't healthy either. I was just trying to help people understand what a psychological addiction is like (since they often deny any kind of addiction if there are not chemicals involved. Heck, some of them even defend chemical addictions). The brain, the mind, the psyche - they are not static. The brain has plasticity - it is modifiable in the way it works, it rearranges itself, and along with it, it rearranges our thoughts and feelings. This can be a good thing, but can also be a bad thing, if one is not appropriately mindful of his own self and actions. Videogames are just a drop in the sea of stuff that affects the experiences that shape us into the persons we eventually become. Gaming should not be singled out, but it shouldn't be left unchecked. I AM a huge defender of gaming - 'cause I'm a gamer. But I don't underestimate its effects (both positive and negative).
Sure, it's fine if we agree to disagree. But my point was not to underestimate the addictiveness of video-games, along with other things, like porn or gambling. You are, of course, also free to claim the harmlessness of videogames.
(Gambling can kill you too, and gaming CAN suck all of your money and ruin your life. Then again, drugs don't have to necessarily kill you if you don't overdo it - to sum it up, people's choices are what matters. And people's choices can be heavily affected by addictive chemicals or addictive behavior. Same sh*t - different package).
To conclude, I think it's dead wrong and naive to deny any harmful effects that gaming can have. Sure, it all depends on the person, but hell, just because I have friends who virtually can't get really drunk no matter how much they drink doesn't mean that alcohol is harmless. The addictiveness stays a fact, and not all are immune of it.
I was just voicing my opinion on why I voted "Yes." It remains a "Yes."
All the best,
Dushan