European mercantilist/imperialist/industrialist exploitation involved more than just slavery. Its brand of slavery diverged significantly from most other forms of historic slavery. The nature of European expansion set the tone for how they treated the cultures they encountered. European military supremacy made it possible to conquer and practically dismantle entire nations. Since Europeans were traveling so far afield in their search for new resources, the people they encountered were largely cultures previously unknown to them; the lack of any pre-existing understanding made it easier for them to treat others without empathy of conscience -- racialist beliefs (common to almost all pre-modern cultures) exploded into the most dehumanizing and rigidly institutionalized form of racism the world has ever seen.Sovvolf said:I could probably bet you that at just about every country and ever ethnicity has been used as slaves before.
And it just got worse and worse over time. The Industrial Revolution brought massive increases in production thanks to new machinery, but demanded lots of hazardous and mechanistic human labor to fill the gaps in the production pipeline. For example, American slavery achieved its worst excesses in the 19th century, after independence, when there was a need for massive industrialized farm labor to provide the raw materials for gin factories.
To put it mildly:
Rome had a fucked-up social system, but the Belgian Congo was an atrocity.
You understand who made Rwanda so bad in the first place, right?Sovvolf said:... even though a lot of your ancestors had to go through hell but now your at least free in America rather then in Rwanda getting shut and killed just for the sake of it, ...
-- Alex