Reasonable Comics For Reasonable People

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Knight Templar said:
RJ 17 said:
PunkRex said:
Knight Templar said:
Yet another toothless inoffensive comic from Critical Miss.

I really wish just once you guys would go out on a limb and say something controversial and entertaining. But no, it's always the same polite, straightforward and reasonable calls to polite conversation from you guys.
You terrible, boring, people you.
Wasn't that the point of this comic, i'm sure they've made other stripes that i'd agree could use more punch but this one was basically saying that that's not what a proper discussion needs.
Considering last Friday's comic and the response to it, I'm pretty sure Templar's comment is dripping with sarcasm.
I prefer the term, atrociously sarcastic.
I see... i'll just go back to my corner then...
 

Lono Shrugged

New member
May 7, 2009
1,467
0
0
I enjoyed the artwork and execution of the joke, but I found the characters to be 1 dimensional and lacking depth. They also seemed to be condescending satirical stereotypes with the comic poking fun at the audience. I would expect more from a short form webcomic that has a history of making exactly these kind of jokes.

3.5 out of 5
 

Gorrath

New member
Feb 22, 2013
1,648
0
0
Funny comic, to be sure. I especially liked the "Parody - What is it?" bit. Not so sure I agree with the part where your gamer says that sometimes, through inaction, he let's a vocal minority represent him. It seems to me that very often the vocal minority is ridiculed plenty by reasonable people, but media attention is always wired to talk far more about the side with the inflammatory viewpoint. It's sort of like saying that Muslims, through inaction, let Al Qaeda say awful things in the name of Islam. Muslims as a whole aren't responsible for what Al Qaeda says and neither are gamers as a whole responsible for what some ignorant jerks say. That said, the tone of the comic is a fantastic contrast to your other one, funny and poignant. Good show!
 

hentropy

New member
Feb 25, 2012
737
0
0
Why are there only two white males in the comic? Are you saying that white males are the only ones with a business in playing or developing video games? Oh I get it, females can only be in it if they are mentally disturbed, lesbian, or redheads with dark skin. You'd probably all give them huge balloon chests in skimpy outfits, because that's what video games have brainwashed men into thinking is normal. And of course the only black guy has to take the bus because he's poor (making less than his white counterparts) and gets shot because he's violent. Not to mention I don't see any fair representation of our transgendered brothers and sisters. Who's to say the stawman actually wants to identify as a male?

I'm not saying you're that bad, I enjoy you comics, I'm just saying you would be Nazi if you lived in those times.
 

Drummodino

Can't Stop the Bop
Jan 2, 2011
2,862
0
0
magicmonkeybars said:
Wow, making fun of emotionally detached people, now I'm even more offended.
I guess if you're disability isn't obvious or part of an established social justice movement you're a guilt free target for ridicule.
I really hope you were being sarcastic, or are ignorant of what happened in the previous comic's comments.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
M0tty said:
Terrible. Not even funny.
8/10
This may be a little too on-the-nose.

OT: Objectively, this comic's beige color was beige and the people were people who reacted in ways that one could imagine people reacting. The strawman's unemployment was evident.

10/10 (could not find objective reasons to remove marks, congratulations on having a fully functional webcomic)
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
drummodino said:
magicmonkeybars said:
Wow, making fun of emotionally detached people, now I'm even more offended.
I guess if you're disability isn't obvious or part of an established social justice movement you're a guilt free target for ridicule.
I really hope you were being sarcastic, or are ignorant of what happened in the previous comic's comments.
I think all posts can be assumed to be soaked in sarcastic sauce (until Boudica 2.0 shows up, anyways).
 

Silent Protagonist

New member
Aug 29, 2012
270
0
0
I like to pretend this comic is a call for people to be more level-headed and reasonable when discussing issues, especially in the relatively trivial sphere of gaming. I know it's really a passive aggressive and snarky response to all the people who dared to be insulted and upset by their previous comic and the massive flaming thread that resulted from it, but I like to pretend it could be something more.

Part of what was frustrating about the "White Guy Defense force" comic is that such aggressive, dismissive, and insulting caricatures of different viewpoints or opinions like the ones found in that comic are already far too common in these discussions. They are a major part of why so many discussions devolve into pointless flame wars like the thread on last weeks comic. We need far more encouragement of the attitude of mutual respect that can bring forth actual discussion and growth found and subsequently mocked in this weeks comic.

This comic would have been brilliant if it wasn't for the subtext of "Oh well, people got insulted so I guess we won't try to do anything funny ever again." It's a shame.
 

MiskWisk

New member
Mar 17, 2012
857
0
0
Haha brilliant. Glad I came out of the fallout shelter for this.

I really hope this will calm people down but I think the previous thread will infect this one too. I feel I should do what Madagascar does in this situation.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Abomination said:
I suppose if being aggressive upsets people it's always an option to be passive aggressive?
Hell just look at these very forums. People here have made passive agressiveness an artform.

A terrible terrible artform.
 

ColaWarVeteran

New member
Jul 27, 2010
110
0
0
Silent Protagonist said:
I like to pretend this comic is a call for people to be more level-headed and reasonable when discussing issues, especially in the relatively trivial sphere of gaming. I know it's really a passive aggressive and snarky response to all the people who dared to be insulted and upset by their previous comic and the massive flaming thread that resulted from it, but I like to pretend it could be something more.

Part of what was frustrating about the "White Guy Defense force" comic is that such aggressive, dismissive, and insulting caricatures of different viewpoints or opinions like the ones found in that comic are already far too common in these discussions. They are a major part of why so many discussions devolve into pointless flame wars like the thread on last weeks comic. We need far more encouragement of the attitude of mutual respect that can bring forth actual discussion and growth found and subsequently mocked in this weeks comic.

This comic would have been brilliant if it wasn't for the subtext of "Oh well, people got insulted so I guess we won't try to do anything funny ever again." It's a shame.
I can't help but feel this is only going to keep getting worse and it isn't helped by posters that are trying to fan the flames. Hell, even the mods are getting in on this. And now in this thread we have the "3.5/5 stars" crap being brought over from Greg Tito's GTA V review that's been generating heat since it was posted.
 

Zombie_Moogle

New member
Dec 25, 2008
666
0
0
RJ 17 said:
PunkRex said:
Knight Templar said:
Yet another toothless inoffensive comic from Critical Miss.

I really wish just once you guys would go out on a limb and say something controversial and entertaining. But no, it's always the same polite, straightforward and reasonable calls to polite conversation from you guys.
You terrible, boring, people you.
Wasn't that the point of this comic, i'm sure they've made other stripes that i'd agree could use more punch but this one was basically saying that that's not what a proper discussion needs.
Considering last Friday's comic and the response to it, I'm pretty sure Templar's comment is dripping with sarcasm.
anthony87 said:
Teoes said:
JonB said:
3.5/5 stars. honestly this comic has gone so far downhill it is ridiculous. i am not reading it anymore.

grey carter used to write about serious important topics and now he has turned into a coward who only writes moronic pc things to please everyone. he is worse than the oatmeal.
Err no, look at the review score guidlines. 3.5 is between "Good, but flawed" and "Very good". So either this cartoon is worth 3.5 stars and is better than you're saying ("so far downhill it is ridiculous", really?) or is as bad as you say and only worth 2.5 stars.

Is it really such a hard concept for people to get their head around?

Docking a comic's score just because you don't like oatmeal is just the most petty thing you could've done.
Or maybe his post was soaked in sarcasm? Wait....maybe yours is too.....WHERE DOES IT END????

OT: I quite liked this one. Much better than last weeks comic Oh snap!
Poe's Law is going off the charts on this forum

Which meme would best represent this... hmmm... ugh, hate to do it, but...

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/166147/over-9000-o.gif
 

broca

New member
Apr 30, 2013
118
0
0
I totally agree with the point i assume this comic strip tries to make: it's either total blandness or painting people one does not agree with as racist murderers. And i also wholly agree with the makers of this comic strips that painting people one does not agree with as racist murderers is both a valid and effective strategy in discussions (/sarcasm, if that isn't clear by now).
 

Viredae

New member
Nov 10, 2009
24
0
0
See, while this one I can't help but laugh (I found the last comic to be in ridiculously poor taste), I'd honestly say I'd prefer this sort of comic every week than what Gray and Carter have been frankensteining for the recent while.

basically, I'd rather have over the top PC-ness than over the top mockery and ridicule.
 

Combustion Kevin

New member
Nov 17, 2011
1,206
0
0
"honest and open discourse"?
Aren't some developers forbidden to talk about the design process under contract? as in, you don't know who made what call?
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Silent Protagonist said:
I like to pretend this comic is a call for people to be more level-headed and reasonable when discussing issues, especially in the relatively trivial sphere of gaming. I know it's really a passive aggressive and snarky response to all the people who dared to be insulted and upset by their previous comic and the massive flaming thread that resulted from it, but I like to pretend it could be something more.

Part of what was frustrating about the "White Guy Defense force" comic is that such aggressive, dismissive, and insulting caricatures of different viewpoints or opinions like the ones found in that comic are already far too common in these discussions. They are a major part of why so many discussions devolve into pointless flame wars like the thread on last weeks comic. We need far more encouragement of the attitude of mutual respect that can bring forth actual discussion and growth found and subsequently mocked in this weeks comic.

This comic would have been brilliant if it wasn't for the subtext of "Oh well, people got insulted so I guess we won't try to do anything funny ever again." It's a shame.
Agreed. I just rolled my eyes at the last comic and moved on without responding, because I knew they were just trolling for views. This comic would have been clever if the last one was funny, and not agonizing for anyone other than manginas to read.

Grey, if you are reading this, enough webcomic artists have turned the medium into a joke by pulling this crap. I know you're better than this. The viewership might be down, but please have some integrity. Please don't jump the shark, if you haven't already.

(inb4 the next comic mocking that last statement)

That's all I really have to say.