Do you even know what you linked?Pyro Paul said:Incorrect.
Cherry picking a single word out of a sentence to define the rest of the statement is now how the english language works.
see, if you understood basic english
'...standardized in relation to...'
is a statement and should be considered as a whole.
As to its meaning... well that means that the individual would not be able to reach the 'standard' in alotted time required for it to be accomplished.
as for ' no such thing as standardized music ' statement...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A440_(pitch_standard)
yes... yes it can be. and it has.
Codified by the International Organization for Standardization title 16 'Acoustics -- standard tuning frequency (standard musical pitch)'
It is funny because you say you're following the rules of Semantics (although semantics don't define words, they help you understand the meaning beind words and statements) and do so by completely disregarding Grammar (the rules of which language is built on).
yes, you've given your definition of professional.
and i've stated it is wrong and provided another conflicting definition which is supported by the United States Code of Law.
I then went on to argue against the point of the definition to disprove it:
Professional Grade, Professional Criminal, Professional Resume... all of which don't get paid.
Dismantling the word to its base meaning, professional>Person of Profession>Person of a vocation that requires skill/training.
Professional Certification (photography, computer repair, automotive maintance).
base definition Profession paid for Skill > Occupation paid for Time (supported that the artist has to pay for the time to use a stage, concert hall, or even recording studio)
and yet, you disregard all of these and argue semantics over individual words in each statement.
i'm sure again, you'll argue the fininte meaning of 'certification' or something.
"it has served as the audio frequency reference for the calibration of acoustic equipment and the tuning of pianos, violins, and other musical instruments."
It's a note for tuning musical instruments.
It's not a standard for human voices. There is no standard for song or music.
A musical instrument can be standardized, the music played on it can not.
Next time read the page you link first please.
As for your examples:
- Professional criminals are criminals who earn enough money through their crime to support their livelihoods.
- Grades and Resumes aren't people. The definition of professional we're arguing about is the one that relates to people. As in professional artist. You even quoted the US law of the definition relating to people, so why are you bringing grades and resumes into this?
Seriously, you're grasping at straws here. It's not working. Is it really so hard to admit that you were mistaken?