Azuaron said:
My god! How many novelists have violated the IHL?
And Shindler's List should be banned!
I assume massive irony is present here and not near-terminal retardation?
ph0b0s123 said:
This actually make me angry. With all the war crimes happening in the real world right now and they are taking time away from dealing with that, to think about virtual worlds. As I said, actually makes me angry.
A "Small" group. Not like it was major, at all.
My view is strange but...
Well, Yeah. You know what? If you had to follow the Geneva convention it would make RTS games much more interesting (The supplies and logistics of having to deal with several thousand POW's after a regiment surrenders and all that...) and more educational (Which matters to me) and, almost most importantly for me, more realistic. I do love me some realism.
Look, it aint the biggest issue. But... Making modern war games follow the laws of modern war is not such a bad thing, at all. I mean, a few civilians here and there, consequences for shooting a POW and bam, the Red Cross is made happier, games are made more realistic and perhaps you add a quick reminder that the enemy are people too.
Also civilians add another level of difficulty. And realism. As does being punished for accidentally putting a bullet in them.
But whatever, that is my two cents on the issue.