I like Chrome for the elegant and shiny design it sports. :3 Thankfully, that particular theme is also available for Firefox so my FF looks like Chrome and works like FF.UrKnightErrant said:I dunno. My firefox has been getting kind of hinky lately. I still use it for work because I'm something of a plugin junky, but in my spare time I find myself looking more and more to Google Chrome.
This is exactly what I'm thinking. I'm using FF6 Beta and Aurora right now anyways.... Also chrome has the same add ons as firefox.Aeshi said:Does this study take moddability into account? I mean Firefox alone has several dozen security add-ons, I'm pretty sure NoScript alone would close the gap quite a bit.
Can't really speak for the others as I've never used them.
Not only did it have its settings toggled with, they turned on all the security settings making it probably 100% unuseable for casual browsing. When you block 99% of internet traffic no shit you're going to have 99% of things blocked. We can ignore this "study". Nice try microsoft.It became obvious from this worldwide test and our recent European and Asia-Pacific tests, in comparison to our earlier global tests, that Microsoft continues to improve their IE malware protection in Internet Explorer 9 through its SmartScreen® Filter technology and with the addition of SmartScreen Application Reputation technology. With SmartScreen enabled and Application Reputation disabled, IE9 achieved a unique URL blocking score of 89.5% and over-time protection rating of 96%. Enabling Application Reputation on top of SmartScreen increased the unique URL block rate of Internet Explorer 9 by 10.4% (to 99.9%) as well as the over-time protection by 3.2% (to99.2%). Internet Explorer 9 was by far the best at protecting against socially-engineered malware, even before App Rep?s protection is layered on top of SmartScreen.
The significance of Microsoft?s new application reputation technology
I like IE too, personally I think a lot of the hate is just people trying to be "cool" by being alternative and not using the mainstream browser. I have IE, Firefox and Chrome installed on my computer and there's no noticeable difference in speed between them, and IE has the best layout for me so I use that.Deshara said:I've never understood why people hate IE. I like IE. Especially 8. 8 was very conventient, and I kinda miss it
Nevermind, ignore what I said. Gonna continue bugging my friend to switch, like usual.crepesack said:This is exactly what I'm thinking. I'm using FF6 Beta and Aurora right now anyways.... Also chrome has the same add ons as firefox.Aeshi said:Does this study take moddability into account? I mean Firefox alone has several dozen security add-ons, I'm pretty sure NoScript alone would close the gap quite a bit.
Can't really speak for the others as I've never used them.
EDIT: Read through the case study a bit. This is the most bullshit test I've ever seen. Looking at it, it seems each of the other browsers were used as they were downloaded: no changes in anything including no "no script" and no "ad block plus". While on the other hand IE9 received:
Not only did it have its settings toggled with, they turned on all the security settings making it probably 100% unuseable for casual browsing. When you block 99% of internet traffic no shit you're going to have 99% of things blocked. We can ignore this "study". Nice try microsoft.It became obvious from this worldwide test and our recent European and Asia-Pacific tests, in comparison to our earlier global tests, that Microsoft continues to improve their IE malware protection in Internet Explorer 9 through its SmartScreen® Filter technology and with the addition of SmartScreen Application Reputation technology. With SmartScreen enabled and Application Reputation disabled, IE9 achieved a unique URL blocking score of 89.5% and over-time protection rating of 96%. Enabling Application Reputation on top of SmartScreen increased the unique URL block rate of Internet Explorer 9 by 10.4% (to 99.9%) as well as the over-time protection by 3.2% (to99.2%). Internet Explorer 9 was by far the best at protecting against socially-engineered malware, even before App Rep?s protection is layered on top of SmartScreen.
The significance of Microsoft?s new application reputation technology
Figured as much. Extra settings enabled for IE9 plus old versions of other browsers with no extra settings enabled = of course IE9 blocks more stuff.crepesack said:EDIT: Read through the case study a bit. This is the most bullshit test I've ever seen. Looking at it, it seems each of the other browsers were used as they were downloaded: no changes in anything including no "no script" and no "ad block plus". While on the other hand IE9 received:
Not only did it have its settings toggled with, they turned on all the security settings making it probably 100% unuseable for casual browsing. When you block 99% of internet traffic no shit you're going to have 99% of things blocked. We can ignore this "study". Nice try microsoft.It became obvious from this worldwide test and our recent European and Asia-Pacific tests, in comparison to our earlier global tests, that Microsoft continues to improve their IE malware protection in Internet Explorer 9 through its SmartScreen® Filter technology and with the addition of SmartScreen Application Reputation technology. With SmartScreen enabled and Application Reputation disabled, IE9 achieved a unique URL blocking score of 89.5% and over-time protection rating of 96%. Enabling Application Reputation on top of SmartScreen increased the unique URL block rate of Internet Explorer 9 by 10.4% (to 99.9%) as well as the over-time protection by 3.2% (to99.2%). Internet Explorer 9 was by far the best at protecting against socially-engineered malware, even before App Rep?s protection is layered on top of SmartScreen.
The significance of Microsoft?s new application reputation technology
But then you'd just be getting even more virusses. Real ones.Woodsey said:They'd need to send me a whore-a-day to get me to start using Internet Explorer.
At least the means through which I receive them will be more pleasurable.smeghead25 said:But then you'd just be getting even more virusses. Real ones.Woodsey said:They'd need to send me a whore-a-day to get me to start using Internet Explorer.