Report: Internet Explorer 9 Doesn't Suck
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
But then you'd just be getting even more virusses. Real ones.Woodsey said:
OT: I have always used IE and never had a problem. It's functional for me.
I'm sorry but this isn't evidence that IE is the better way to go...
It's evidence that people are retarded and despite all their better judgement will still believe they are genuinely the luckiest bastard alive in winning the Nigerian lottery without even having entered.
Also, if that discount viagra sounds too good to be true... yeah, you get the picture.
It's evidence that people are retarded and despite all their better judgement will still believe they are genuinely the luckiest bastard alive in winning the Nigerian lottery without even having entered.
Also, if that discount viagra sounds too good to be true... yeah, you get the picture.
Safari's touch gesture capabilities, excellent interface and full-screen mode are what make me use it, though I wouldn't use it if it were slow or if I were always getting viruses. But it isn't, and I'm not, so it's the usability and extra features that tip the balance for me.
Well, DUH.Greg Tito said:
Honestly, the 'big fight' over browsers is as lame as any console war. They work FINE, some parts better than others. Some people.
YAY it protects me from malware, but does a shitty job on everything else. I use firefox, chrome, and ie all the time, and ie crashes the most, has the most things that piss me off, and overall has the least reasons for me to use it.
But that doesn't make any sense... Oh wait yes it does, the results for firefox were done without any type of ad blocker installed (which incidentally also block bad url's)
Besides, I don't NEED my internet browser to block all the viruses. If one gets through somehow, THAT'S WHAT ANTIVIRUS PROGRAMS ARE FOR. Unless you use Norton. Then I feel bad for you.
Besides, I don't NEED my internet browser to block all the viruses. If one gets through somehow, THAT'S WHAT ANTIVIRUS PROGRAMS ARE FOR. Unless you use Norton. Then I feel bad for you.
Not clicking malicious links in the first place will protect you 100% of the time. No browser can do what common sense can.
For everything else, there's decent AV-programs (like Avast)
For everything else, there's decent AV-programs (like Avast)
I'm sorry but if you need IE to block malware then your doing something wrong, your anti virus or anti malware software should be doing this not a browser, or is it just mine thats capable of doing it?
For me IE constantly crashes on the slightest thing yet firefox runs perfectly for me, the only reason i keep IE is incase a website doesn't work with anything other than IE, normally a thing of the past but you'd be surprised at how many websites are still around which ask you to view in IE otherwise something like the buttons won't work.
For me IE constantly crashes on the slightest thing yet firefox runs perfectly for me, the only reason i keep IE is incase a website doesn't work with anything other than IE, normally a thing of the past but you'd be surprised at how many websites are still around which ask you to view in IE otherwise something like the buttons won't work.
99.2 versus 13.2?
There's something that's not just fishy, but entirely piscine about that. There's frankly no way something like that could even be allowed to happen.
And I'd be very interested to see where IE8 scored.
Nope, until there's some proper documentation, I'm counting this as a Microsoft trick. One other browser maybe, but all? Nope. Something's going on.
There's something that's not just fishy, but entirely piscine about that. There's frankly no way something like that could even be allowed to happen.
And I'd be very interested to see where IE8 scored.
Nope, until there's some proper documentation, I'm counting this as a Microsoft trick. One other browser maybe, but all? Nope. Something's going on.
