Aah, the wonders of facial hair... Stopped counting how many times that has helped me when i was younger...TehIrishSoap said:It's Easier For Us Europeans, IMO
We Have 12, 16, And 18
I'm 14, And Growing A Beard, Which Makes It 10X Easier!!!
Aah, the wonders of facial hair... Stopped counting how many times that has helped me when i was younger...TehIrishSoap said:It's Easier For Us Europeans, IMO
We Have 12, 16, And 18
I'm 14, And Growing A Beard, Which Makes It 10X Easier!!!
no, really parents have a good understanding of the system we have but the opponents of videogames dont care, they will use any method they can to demonize them and until either the game industry rolls over like the comics one did or the national view of games becomes more mature, they will keep yelling about it, fortinatly the national view of games is getting better simply because there are so many "gamers" nowPedroSteckecilo said:I do think that the ESRB needs to implement a Color Coding System similar to the PEGI ratings in Europe. Say what you will about it but Parents are occasionally dense and distracted people and a simple "Green is for Kids, Yellow is For Teens, Orange is for Grown-Ups and Red is Porn (for lack of a better term)" might go a long way in identifying to parents whether or not their kid should be playing this game. PEGI uses it, Canadian Movie ratings use it, and as far as I'm concerned videogames should use it.
Educating Parents in the particulars of game ratings could help kill any future attempts to demonize game devs and sellers for overlooking their "duty" to consumers.
Thank goodness more responsible parents! This is what is needed not the big brother approach by local and state governments. Mad props to your parents Hatchet90, could use more folks like them.Hatchet90 said:Oh look at that, now parents have no one to blame but themselves. Don't worry folks, I'm sure they will latch on to some other non story, like Dungeons and Dragons in the 70's and Pokemon in the 90's.
And if you're wondering, both my parents were incredibly strict when it came to what games I played when I was younger. My father was an avid PC gamer and was very knowledgeable on what games I should and should not be able to play. Hell I wasn't even allowed to play first person shooters or other violent games (T for Teen) until I was 15. In this day and age I feel proud that my parents watched out for what I played, even if I didn't understand it at the time.
And your streets aren't filled with murderous children raping everything? But, but the news said kids playing violent games would turn them into murderous rapists.Mackheath said:Over here I could have got Manhunt and San Andreas at 13 years old, I played my first 18 game at 12 and saw my first 18 film at 14.
Censorship laws are practically non-existant here.
Agreed. Instead of spending all this damn money trying to ban the things, why not use that money to educate the public? Hell I do it all the time, letting parents know what each game contains.TheDist said:Ive spent a good ammount of time in the USA, everytime I bought a mature game there I have been asked for ID and I am good way over 18 years. (it is very funny though to see somone react to a british driving licence, the look of panic on their face makes my day!)
To be honest I think the real issue (at least in the USA/UK) is parents buying mature games for their kids with no real knowlage of what they are buying them.
I think you misunderstood most of this.yundex said:Have any of the people whining about how bad a parent is for buying an M rated game for their child or sibling, played these types of games growing up? Can anyone explain why i'm a bad person for letting a sibling who lives with me play the same games I do? (7 btw) Currently finishing up assassin's creed, and I grew up playing these types of games myself. From doom, heritic, hexen and MK, to resident evil. I was playing those games when I was 8 ffs, and i've been gaming on the nes since I was 3. So, how should this have "harmed" me? And how will this "harm" her?
Maybe the people i'm directing this to, are just complaining about the parents who buy the games and whine about the content, but that isn't the vibe i'm getting.
That's what I was thinking at first, hence my last sentence. But it seems like some people(nubrain for example) are implying something else.Lightslei said:I think you misunderstood most of this.yundex said:Have any of the people whining about how bad a parent is for buying an M rated game for their child or sibling, played these types of games growing up? Can anyone explain why i'm a bad person for letting a sibling who lives with me play the same games I do? (7 btw) Currently finishing up assassin's creed, and I grew up playing these types of games myself. From doom, heritic, hexen and MK, to resident evil. I was playing those games when I was 8 ffs, and i've been gaming on the nes since I was 3. So, how should this have "harmed" me? And how will this "harm" her?
Maybe the people i'm directing this to, are just complaining about the parents who buy the games and whine about the content, but that isn't the vibe i'm getting.
Parents are looking for the next thing to blame all of the world's troubles on, and this time it's video games. If they stopped getting pissed off about their kids playing the games they bought, we wouldn't even have this discussion.
Alright I'm calling major bs on your statement. I played the first GTA and I couldn't have been older than 9. Now, 8 years later, I hate violence. It just disgusts me.dex-dex said:any parents that some idea on how to raise a decent human being would never buy a m rated game for a kid.jbchillin said:Won't affect way to much. A lot of kids have their parents buy games
but then again....
IF it was FOX news it is always wrong, if it was CNN they are ignorant and need to go back to school, if it was The Daily Show or the Colbert Report then it was just for fun and you really shouldn't take it seriously.Irridium said:And your streets aren't filled with murderous children raping everything? But, but the news said kids playing violent games would turn them into murderous rapists.Mackheath said:Over here I could have got Manhunt and San Andreas at 13 years old, I played my first 18 game at 12 and saw my first 18 film at 14.
Censorship laws are practically non-existant here.
Was the news *gasp* wrong?!
Agreed. Instead of spending all this damn money trying to ban the things, why not use that money to educate the public? Hell I do it all the time, letting parents know what each game contains.TheDist said:Ive spent a good ammount of time in the USA, everytime I bought a mature game there I have been asked for ID and I am good way over 18 years. (it is very funny though to see somone react to a british driving licence, the look of panic on their face makes my day!)
To be honest I think the real issue (at least in the USA/UK) is parents buying mature games for their kids with no real knowlage of what they are buying them.
Not really I know there are a LOT of bus drivers and shop workers who will have doubts about people's ages but can't be bothered checking (Still able to use young person's bus card even though it's almost 2 years expired). It is their job to, but I know a lot of occasions where workers will just skip the age check to get the sale/admission done. In fact a lot of bus drivers don't even look at what you pay them so they can get their shift over withAxCx said:Im sorry, but that is just a retarded thing to say. These people get paid to check IDs all day. Im sure bus drivers dont "want" to check tickets all day, and a secretary doesnt "want" to spend all day awnsering calls and typing. But a job is a job.Kukakkau said:While that's true it is understandable since there are kids who look older than then are and working in a game shop you really don't want to have to check every customers age day in and day out.
Although, I can only second you on the doubts about the numbers. Mhhh....
I beg to differ: kids who could handle M-rated games in elementary school aren't exactly rare, and a lot of the dickishness of some of them is probably more bragging about being able to play M-rated games than the games themselves (case in point: several kids I knew back then, some who were and were not dicks about it).dex-dex said:any parents that some idea on how to raise a decent human being would never buy a m rated game for a kid.jbchillin said:Won't affect way to much. A lot of kids have their parents buy games
That would probably never be fixed. As long as people buy cigarettes, alcohol, and firearms for minors the same will happen with videogames and movies.Logan Westbrook said:It's hard to know to know whether these figures will really make all that much difference, as it's a little too easy to talk around them. They certainly show that minors usually can't buy M rated games themselves, but they don't do anything to stop the idea that parents don't understand ESRB ratings and will buy M rated games for their kids.
Ha ha! That's exactly what I was thinking about.Jack and Calumon said:I wonder what game could have changed this and kept it this way?Logan Westbrook said:the number of underage shoppers turned away when they attempted to buy M rated games until it hit 80% in 2007, where it has remained ever since.
OT: All they need is a BIG RED LABEL saying "18+" like they do in England. Then it's all fine!
Calumon: I wonder if they wanted a microphone with that game? :S
This is not about fascism. It is about the governement making itself responsible for kids, and letting parents off the hook. this is how freedoms, guaranteed us in the Bill of Rights, end up getting taken away. Because some harlot who should never have had kids buys her worthless offspring a violent video game, and then blames the industry. as an american, I have had enough of these people, both the irresponsible breeders and the government that thinks it needs to regulate everything so that little timmy tardpants will not see a violent game and have his mind "warped".AxCx said:Ok, a lot of people seem to be getting pissed at my comment. So its kinda unfair to pick out yours and reply to it, but I am sure as hell not gonna go through the work to quote everyone. Anyway, this is to everyone, not just you.magnuslion said:It is not anyone, including the shop employees/owners, job to police peoples brats. either be a parent or do not have kids damnit! the rest of us do not want to have to pick up the slack!!AxCx said:TBH, 80% is WAY to little. 20% can get games they shouldnt be able to? Thats shocking.
It is, however, no argument for the banning of violent games. The violent games arent the problem, its the salesmen. When a shop sells an underage dude beer, its the shop that gets the law on its nuts. Should be the same thing here.
What a lot of you are saying is that salesmen just dont feel like doing there job, and that them not doing there job is perfectly fine. WTH? Am I really such an asshole for expecting a guy to do his job? I mean, apart from the fact that lasy salesmen in game stores is only gonna reflect badly on us, the gamers, and give people another reason to hate video games, all I am saying is these guys are getting payed to do whatever they are told to do - checking IDs is no exception. And sorry to break it too you, but if the hardest and most tiring thing you have to do at your workplace is check IDs, I want your job.
Of course it shouldnt be a shopkeepers/salesmens job to look after parents children. Just like its not a teachers job to raise children. But that just simply isnt an excuse! Does that mean we should sell kids pornographic magazines and drugs too leave the parents to sort them out when they come home stoned? Fuck no! But its the same logic you are using.
A greater part of the escapist community is all to quick to point out when something is against the law. Its just stupid to pretend this is something else.
A lot of the critizism for my statement just adds up too "Its not my/there job to police peoples kids, and do you now how hard it is to read a date?". Sorry, but that just isnt good enough.
...Your point being? Some people arent doing there job right, so why should anyone else?Kukakkau said:Not really I know there are a LOT of bus drivers and shop workers who will have doubts about people's ages but can't be bothered checking (Still able to use young person's bus card even though it's almost 2 years expired). It is their job to, but I know a lot of occasions where workers will just skip the age check to get the sale/admission done. In fact a lot of bus drivers don't even look at what you pay them so they can get their shift over with
I am no supporter of "fascist" policies when it comes to employment. But some of you are acting like complete idiots.