Wait, they're shipping an empty box?The good news is that Halo: ODST is more of what you love about Halo. That's also the bad news.
Wait, they're shipping an empty box?The good news is that Halo: ODST is more of what you love about Halo. That's also the bad news.
Actually they brought back the health system.BlueInkAlchemist said:If it weren't priced for the most efficient gouging of impressionable Halo fans, I might consider picking this up, if I knew it required more tactical thinking than the usual Master Chief/Arbiter wade-into-enemy-fire-guns-blazing procedure. This being Halo, however, I'm sure even the fragile ODST troopers regenerate their health pretty quickly.
That made me laugh ALOT, yes, must be!KDR_11k said:Wait, they're shipping an empty box?The good news is that Halo: ODST is more of what you love about Halo. That's also the bad news.
one thing i'll say about the enemy's is that the A.I. is far FAR better. firefight feels like a different game with the same visuals.Hardcore_gamer said:Heh.05rutterb said:There aren't new enemies, but there's harder versions of the enemies already in halo.
Well that's not very creative. Harder versions of the same enemy's don't count as new enemy's in my book.
What forces you to type a paragraph just to bash a game that isn't out yet for a well known series? A game being popular, debatably overly so, is no excuse to enter troll mode every time it's mentioned.muffincakes said:"This is what Bungie does, and they do it better than anyone else."
What, make a very floaty shooter for the largest niche of gamers(Halo fanboys) and copy and paste the multiplayer a few times while ignoring the importance of a single-player campaign? I mean, you said it yourself, the single player could be considered more of a "training grounds" for the multiplayer. Sorry, but I'll stick to Unreal if I want a decent floaty multiplayer game that doesn't require you to shell out ten bucks if you want to play more than one type of multiplayer.
Well, first off, the game has been released. Second, I did not bash the game, I merely pointed out certain characteristics about the other games which are true, and that I disagree with(the games are floaty, and the multiplayer is recylcled[although that could be said about any game]). Third, the only reason I stated my opinions in the manner that I did was because of the way Russ said that Bungie was the best at what they do, which is a biased opinion based on high sales figures.hypothetical fact said:What forces you to type a paragraph just to bash a game that isn't out yet for a well known series? A game being popular, debatably overly so, is no excuse to enter troll mode every time it's mentioned.muffincakes said:"This is what Bungie does, and they do it better than anyone else."
What, make a very floaty shooter for the largest niche of gamers(Halo fanboys) and copy and paste the multiplayer a few times while ignoring the importance of a single-player campaign? I mean, you said it yourself, the single player could be considered more of a "training grounds" for the multiplayer. Sorry, but I'll stick to Unreal if I want a decent floaty multiplayer game that doesn't require you to shell out ten bucks if you want to play more than one type of multiplayer.
On topic I'll wait for some gameplay videos to come out for the silenced smg sections to see how important stealth actually is, as that seems to be the biggest difference between this and halo 3.
Or perhaps, and I'm just throwing this out there, his opinion is based on his personal experience playing first person shooters?muffincakes said:... because of the way Russ said that Bungie was the best at what they do, which is a biased opinion based on high sales figures.
Well fine, I'll give you that, and I apologize to Russ for my assumption. However, most reviewers seem to be afraid to criticize Halo because it is so popular, so they make statements like his. Again, my mistake. *Hopes no mods were offended and hides*Susan Arendt said:Or perhaps, and I'm just throwing this out there, his opinion is based on his personal experience playing first person shooters?muffincakes said:... because of the way Russ said that Bungie was the best at what they do, which is a biased opinion based on high sales figures.
Don't bother, it's rather tiresome to convince Halo-haters to think otherwise. They'll always pull that stuff out right back at you. It's best just to avoid them.Susan Arendt said:Or perhaps, and I'm just throwing this out there, his opinion is based on his personal experience playing first person shooters?muffincakes said:... because of the way Russ said that Bungie was the best at what they do, which is a biased opinion based on high sales figures.
We're not most reviewers.muffincakes said:Well fine, I'll give you that, and I apologize to Russ for my assumption. However, most reviewers seem to be afraid to criticize Halo because it is so popular, so they make statements like his. Again, my mistake. *Hopes no mods were offended and hides*Susan Arendt said:Or perhaps, and I'm just throwing this out there, his opinion is based on his personal experience playing first person shooters?muffincakes said:... because of the way Russ said that Bungie was the best at what they do, which is a biased opinion based on high sales figures.
Good one, that made me laugh.KDR_11k said:Wait, they're shipping an empty box?The good news is that Halo: ODST is more of what you love about Halo. That's also the bad news.
and still say this review proves the game isn't any good. Say hello to the internet's biggest demographic which hates a game without playing it, everyone! The Halo hater!Recommendation: If you're a slave to multiplayer, then you need this game. Everyone else will be playing it, plus it comes with the complete set of Halo 3 downloadable maps as a bonus freebie. If multiplayer isn't your thing, then you might give this a rent to see if it hooks you. You'll probably still enjoy it, even if you're not a Halo fanboy, but the price is a bit high for such a short game.
Holy crap that's badass.Susan Arendt said:We're not most reviewers.