I saw you playing this and thought about sending you a message saying something along the line of i look forward to the review, but a thought occured to me, what if this is an important part thats going into the review. So is it a good idea to send you a message when your playing a game i know your going to be reviewed.John Funk said:Review: Halo: Reach
Bungie's farewell Halo title is also arguably its finest.
Read Full Article
While the first three installments of Halo were undoubtedly fairly epic, think about it--were the characters in them really that engaging? The only one who got more than 5 minutes of screentime at a time was Master Chief, and he's the proverbial blank slate--no personality whatsoever. Furthermore, if you look into the games and the canon behind Halos 1, 2, and 3, you will find that there are several major plot holes which Bungie has attempted to fix with (and I kid you not here) time travel.Lim3 said:I finished the campaign today; the story was not engaging, the characters boring and the action and battles don't live up to their predecessors. Also there were plot holes; lots of plot holes, which i'm pretty sure there will be attempts to cover up.
When compared to the EPICNESS of Halo 3 (and 1 & 2) in terms of story line and battles Reach falls far short. You drive PAST scarabs in the last level, rather then engaging them. You DON'T take on hordes of enemies, the enemies themselves seemed smaller, less fearsome and more boring then in Halo 3.
BloodSquirrel said:It's a Halo thread. The game is a lightning rod for trolls.Seaf The Troll said:that maybe a lot harsh?Jezzascmezza said:Isn't that maybe a little harsh?Lim3 said:I give it a 5/10
I'm pretty sure that you could increase that average IQ for any gaming forum by 50 points by just insta-banning anybody whobashedlikes Halo.
Technically they moved it from the Mac to the Xbox. PC was an added bonus. Just so everyone knows it was originally supposed to be Mac exclusive to show what you could do with its graphics. Buuuut microsoft bought them over. And the guy in charge of Bungie actually ended up leaving the company, but hey lets stay positive.JIst00 said:BloodSquirrel said:It's a Halo thread. The game is a lightning rod for trolls.Seaf The Troll said:that maybe a lot harsh?Jezzascmezza said:Isn't that maybe a little harsh?Lim3 said:I give it a 5/10
I'm pretty sure that you could increase that average IQ for any gaming forum by 50 points by just insta-banning anybody whobashedlikes Halo.
Fixed that for you. =P
In all seriousness, I have no doubt it's a good game, I'm just still bitter that they moved the first Halo from the PC to the Xbox originally. I was so pissed off at the time, I was really looking forward to it, then they did the unthinkable, they put an FPS on a console. Mouse and Keyboard ladies and gentlemen, thebestonly was to play an FPS.
That's a touch harsh do you not think?BloodSquirrel said:I'm pretty sure that you could increase that average IQ for any gaming forum by 50 points by just insta-banning anybody who bashed Halo.
Evidence for my theory accumulates quickly.Woodsey said:So they're stupid because they don't agree with you? Nice.
He wasn't trolling anyway - he just gave a score. To him 5/10 might mean average,thereby perfectly describing Halowhich is fair enough if that's what he thinks.
Evidence for mine just dropped down in one fell swoop.BloodSquirrel said:Evidence for my theory accumulates quickly.Woodsey said:So they're stupid because they don't agree with you? Nice.
He wasn't trolling anyway - he just gave a score. To him 5/10 might mean average,thereby perfectly describing Halowhich is fair enough if that's what he thinks.