You've just painted a target on your chest and asked us to look the other way. This will not end well. Especially if it's anything in the 333 level. I gotta look up your loot table now.John Funk said:John Funk drops epics when killed. Please don't try to test this.
Unimaginative and strained? Don't knock what you haven't played. Cataclysm is about 100x more imaginative then the original WoW from 6 years ago. 12 million people aren't going to play a game for 6 years if it's bad. No matter how "addicting" it is.Pirate Kitty said:They can reboot it as much as they like. Won't change anything. We will be continuing to play better games with the other, more thirsty gamers. Release all the unimaginative and strained expansions you like, Blizzard. This puddle won't get any deeper.
I would love to hear some of these "better" games you and "thirsty" gamers are playing. Honestly Blizzard knows how to make good games and addictive or not people will quit if a game is bad and apparently WoW isnt. I doubt you've ever even played the game besides a trial, if that.Pirate Kitty said:They can reboot it as much as they like. Won't change anything. We will be continuing to play better games with the other, more thirsty gamers. Release all the unimaginative and strained expansions you like, Blizzard. This puddle won't get any deeper.
or your just a wow fan who can't see past wow?Slenn said:Cataclysm is well worth more than Starcraft 2. Starcraft 2 was almost a near flop of an RTS in terms of its single player campaign. Cataclysm was innovative in almost every way with the addition of archaeology and the new areas while still keeping up the old vanilla WoW interface.
Really? You're going to make that assumption about me *just* because I gave more praise to WoW than SC2? I am not addicted to either game, nor am I a huge Blizzard fan because I have a lot of their games. I tried both games, and when I first played SC2's campaign I enjoyed it quite a lot, but when I got to thinking about it, it felt like I was playing more of a storyline than an actual RTS. In fact most of the new characters (like Tosh and the Doctor) can be completely removed to give room to flesh out the story between Arcturus Mensgk, Alex Mengsk, Jim Raynor, and Kerrigan. Why? Because they contribute almost nothing to the plot line. All they do is act like parts of an expansion pack by introducing more units. This isn't an expansion pack, this is a sequel. The campaign felt like it needed to bring back all the original units (which is cool but it's also waisting a ton of time), and was totally a backlash from what the Beta led me to believe.jackpipsam said:or your just a wow fan who can't see past wow?Slenn said:Cataclysm is well worth more than Starcraft 2. Starcraft 2 was almost a near flop of an RTS in terms of its single player campaign. Cataclysm was innovative in almost every way with the addition of archaeology and the new areas while still keeping up the old vanilla WoW interface.