Ridiculously unfair stuff in multiplayer
- Thread starter The Wykydtron
- Start date
Recommended Videos
distortedreality said:
Dont get me wrong i hate them as much as the next person (fuck. the. tactical. nuke. fuck that thing up the ass.....with razorblades...) but most people ignore the fact they most can be countered fairly easily. Of course it doesnt defend them ebing there but it makes them being there kinda pointless.
Agreed with Dark souls. I pretty much just don't even play it anymore because of how crap the PvP was. I wanted to try fighting some guy's but everybody and I mean everybody had some kind of stupid end game level lightning weapon that they could use to 2 shot me to death even if I block.
I just got so bored of it that I haven't bothered going back yet.
I just got so bored of it that I haven't bothered going back yet.
and then you go on a server that has votes on random critsDaystar Clarion said:
and almost every round the votes to allow them passes
Capache edit: Apparently, a way to describe "Cat chow" in one word is 'penis'
Every class had a familiar downed spell to thatBlights said:
Thieves also have low health and only do large amounts of damage through backstabs
Also, invisibility lasts a few seconds max, none of this endless cloak like in similar rpgs
In no way were the thieves overpowered.
The PVP in dark souls is certainly annoying. I only play as a hollow for exactly that reason, even though I certainly have the humanity to spare to be human.
But the game is awsome as soon as you get the hang of it (until you've completed it once it's unfair, then you know the game well enough to have fun, which isn't really the best way to do thing,. I liked demon souls better solely for this reason) and jolly cooperation is fun.
But the game is awsome as soon as you get the hang of it (until you've completed it once it's unfair, then you know the game well enough to have fun, which isn't really the best way to do thing,. I liked demon souls better solely for this reason) and jolly cooperation is fun.
I actually like playing with four friends while we all try to screen-cheat. It makes the games so fast paced and forces you to keep your eye on everyone else's screen at the same time. Plus the kill-cams can be hilarious if someone just shoots them through cover or a blind grenade kill.Calcium said:
Didn't exactly said that it was exp.99 who said that, what I'm saying is that the buy unlock system for BF3 isn't a big deal since no weapon is locked to pay users only. Everyone can get those guns. For other games it's different but for BF3 its not since most people who played from the start have most likely unlocked all the weapons and most people just stick to a single weapon forever. Also most of the starting weapon are better than the later ones, there are few selected ones that actually is a little bit better but not by a grand mile.Ix Rebound said:
Anti mage can just be so horribly annoying throughout the entire game when you're playing as a caster. I know it's in the name, but he has shedloads of health, speed, damage, he has blink, and just devastates you at all levels, it's so annoying.somonels said:
It's mostly unfair with vehicles. It's hard to get kills with jet machineguns until you're good at flying, so the first few kills until you get heat seekers (and flares!) are a lot of work. Buying that gives you a massive advantage. When BF3 came out I spent maybe 6 hours getting the hang of flying a jet, slowly gathering points through assissts and disables until I finally unlocked heatseekers (they were still useful back then, especially since few people had flares) Same thing with every other vehicle, best stuff comes lastZukabazuka said:
Which brings me to an unfair thing: Vehicle and weapon unlocks. I get that you have to unlock stuff, but would it really kill the leveling if all vehicles started out with smokes/flares/methods to lose locks?
I really hated it in BF: BC2, where everyone and their mother ran around with magnum ammo, which you didn't get until level 18, meaning you were outgunned until you reached that level.
I hate perks which increase damage anyway, since they're usually the least useful perks but you'll get killed fast if you don't have it. IN BF:BC2 when I got magnum ammo I continued running around with the medkit upgrades instead of that. I got lots of heals and points, but I got gunned down in nearly every straight firefight. Not fun.
crap i didn't read the name of who quoted meZukabazuka said:
my bad
But back on topic,it takes a hell of a lot of games just to finish one class in bf3(if your an OK player like me)
and if the starter weapons were better than most of the ones you unlock, what the point of having an unlock system?
and its not just the guns im talking about, there are some equipment and abilities you have to level up in order to get ass well, like mortars and and those faster sprint or more ammo things
This, couldn't there be something that prevents engies all building too close together? Or would this just unbalance the game? I don't know.totally heterosexual said:
The problem with the KV which is being fixed is that it is a tier 5 tank stats wise and no engine is shit on it and highly prone to fire but has 2 OP guns for its tier and thus also gets ridiculous places in MM. I've gotten games where everyone was a higher tier but arty. After the next patch it will be a fine and balanced tank. Even now I'd take my PZIV or SU85B over the KV any day.Mad Sun said:
So after 7.3 all should be right with the BDR having the best gun and the KV only having better over all armour.
You forgot pre-nerf Evelyn and Twitch, especially Eve, who had one of the fastest jungles in the game, unmatched ganks due to her invisibility, a speed steroid and an on hit stun.NameIsRobertPaulson said:
APB isn't meant to be balanced in any sense of the word. Its a greifer's paradise xD.JLML said:
Some guys are dicks, man, but some others arent.The Wykydtron said:
I once was invaded by a guy in the forest section (dont remember the name now) and I was playing with a friend so we waited for the guy, when he appeared he was still far away so he waved at us and we waved back, he got near us and pointed to the left (I was the host) so I told my friend to not fight and just espectate. It was a 1 on 1, we bought did the "Proper bow" and started the fight like two gentlemen.
Another time I was invaded by another guy that attacked me while I was doing the bow and then he was always with the shield up waiting for me to make the first move without ever running in my direction, what a coward.
Generally refrained from ganking whenever I was levelling. It spirals out of hand much too easily, and that means one can forget about efficient questing for the next hour or so.Guardian of Nekops said:
There were some exceptions though - mainly people I thought would be a good fight - and I still have quite a few fond memories of those.
For example: I met a mage while levelling my rogue through Zangarmarsh. We fought some 10 rounds (he won most of them, but not by a wide margin), and after that waved whenever we saw one another for the next two years.
