So you propose a Brit stance. A sort of bit of both worlds. Like free health care and Education.Mad Maniac with axe-firing chainsaw said:I'm not sure. On one hand, I believe that you need capitalism to drive wealth, motivation and inspiration as well as independence and individuality. On the other hand, socialism is required to catch people who through hard times, personal weakness or just plain bad luck would slip through the cracks of society into total ruin otherwise. However, the system needs to be geared into getting these people back up on their feet as fast as is possible. It should be around to help unfortunate or weak individuals, but it shouldn't encourage reliance on socialist mechanisms.
I suppose I'm a centrist. I support a society geared towards capitalism but with enough well made socialist policies to prevent people from falling destitute when times get desperate.
Well, we Liberal in America hate conservatives and the idea of monarchy, but we like capitalism.Federalist92 said:All i know that in europe its Capitalists on the right, along with conservatives, and monachy style things.Merteg said:How does that make no sense?
I'm a liberal democrat, which is left wing. I live in America, maybe your talking about European political stances?
and on the left theres Socialism, communism and soviet style things
Is the left REALLY dominent.Mansur said:This is the internet, a world
where the left are dominant.
But personally I find a linear
spectrum too basic to fully
describe my political stance.
liberalism means believing in rights and change gun controll and liberals is entirely hyprcitical its like if vladimir lenin pulled a ponzy scheme or whateverXombee said:Economically conservative I guess.
"Treating people" liberally, minus gun control and all that touchy feely shit. Okay, that didn't make much sense, more like I don't care if someone is gay or an illegal immigrant or something.
What has that got to do with left and right wing?Federalist92 said:Is the left REALLY dominent.
Think about it. Even on the escapist where we believe we can all have a nice conversation on equal grounds, theres always moderators who can kick you out.
Think about that.
note: i'm not insulting moderators if there are any moderators here
remember when i said lets have a friendly conversation earlier.seryoga said:the brits are too greedy to have socialist policies we had to fight to get rid of them and the irish still are (up the IRA)
lets just forget that and carry on with the regular topicFulax said:What has that got to do with left and right wing?Federalist92 said:Is the left REALLY dominent.
Think about it. Even on the escapist where we believe we can all have a nice conversation on equal grounds, theres always moderators who can kick you out.
Think about that.
note: i'm not insulting moderators if there are any moderators here
I do favour that kind of thinking, and overall I have some belief in the British system (though the last couple of years has shaken that belief to the core... I now have no faith in any leaders in the world. The word politician has truly become a swear-word around me.) I wish I could say that the British system works as well in practice as it does in theory, but like most systems... well, the best thing I can say about the British system is that nobody starves and you WILL get treated if you are sick. In other words, you can feel reasonably safe in Britain until organ failure, an incurable illness or one of our many criminals takes you. It is far from a perfect system, but as Churchill says, it seems to me to be the least worst system... for all its myriad faults. I should probably look into the various European systems. My knowledge is sadly limited in that area.Federalist92 said:So you propose a Brit stance. A sort of bit of both worlds. Like free health care and Education.Mad Maniac with axe-firing chainsaw said:I'm not sure. On one hand, I believe that you need capitalism to drive wealth, motivation and inspiration as well as independence and individuality. On the other hand, socialism is required to catch people who through hard times, personal weakness or just plain bad luck would slip through the cracks of society into total ruin otherwise. However, the system needs to be geared into getting these people back up on their feet as fast as is possible. It should be around to help unfortunate or weak individuals, but it shouldn't encourage reliance on socialist mechanisms.
I suppose I'm a centrist. I support a society geared towards capitalism but with enough well made socialist policies to prevent people from falling destitute when times get desperate.
Which Obama wants the US to have.
I don't think even he knows what he's talking about. I read it three times and it's still not computing.Xombee said:Does not compute.seryoga said:liberalism means believing in rights and change gun control and liberals is entirely hyprcitical its like if Vladimir lenin pulled a ponzy scheme or whatever
Mind telling me which party is the one by working class people? That's a Labour party that died decades ago, they're all career politicians or champagne socialists now. Just a middle class-chic concept!Federalist92 said:I like the idea of a world run by the people who actually do the hard work. the lowly working class like me.